Skip to content
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Announcements
  3. 💬 Relay
  • Getting Started
  • Controller
  • Build
  • Hardware
  • Download/API
  • Forum
  • Store

💬 Relay

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
139 Posts 47 Posters 33.7k Views 45 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gohanG Offline
    gohanG Offline
    gohan
    Mod
    wrote on last edited by
    #87

    There was a user some time ago that was trying to make a web GUI

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • skywatchS Offline
      skywatchS Offline
      skywatch
      wrote on last edited by
      #88

      I would agree that more advanced sketches 'should' be included on the same page. Keep all the info in one resource place. Provided it is clearly marked as an advanced project it might help people looking for similar functionality or just interested in learning more about programming....

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • hekH Online
        hekH Online
        hek
        Admin
        wrote on last edited by
        #89

        @fhenryco
        https://rakeshpai.github.io/mysensors-network-manager/networks/

        https://github.com/rakeshpai/mysensors-network-manager

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • fhenrycoF Offline
          fhenrycoF Offline
          fhenryco
          wrote on last edited by
          #90

          wow! fantastic! ... the github link readme warns that it's not yet fully ready but the interface is already impressive!
          I still have the same question i had for nodemanager though : for measuring another battery than the one that feeds Vcc obviously another pin is needed, however why not propose as well the option of measuring such pin voltage but with Vcc as the reference rather than the internal 1.1V which most of the time makes necessary a voltage divider ? Actually i did the modification in nodemanager.cpp to use DEFAULT (~3.3V) rather than INTERNAL (1.1V) reference for a 3.3 pro mini and i can get the expected battery level without any voltage divider.

          Another unrelated question i have is : could there be any way to adapt the idea of the readVcc method (which is to measure the internal 1.1V against the Vcc reference to get Vcc) but using any voltage applied to a pin as the reference to again measure the internal 1.1 against it ? This would allow the masurement of any voltage greater than 1.1 without voltage divider while the usual method would be applied for measuring any voltage lower than 1.1 ... what did i miss that makes this impossible ?

          fhenrycoF 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gohanG Offline
            gohanG Offline
            gohan
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by
            #91

            We need to use the internal reference since it is the only stable voltage source and you need the voltage divider to lower the measured voltage between 0 and 1.1v. There are not many options to choose from

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • fhenrycoF fhenryco

              wow! fantastic! ... the github link readme warns that it's not yet fully ready but the interface is already impressive!
              I still have the same question i had for nodemanager though : for measuring another battery than the one that feeds Vcc obviously another pin is needed, however why not propose as well the option of measuring such pin voltage but with Vcc as the reference rather than the internal 1.1V which most of the time makes necessary a voltage divider ? Actually i did the modification in nodemanager.cpp to use DEFAULT (~3.3V) rather than INTERNAL (1.1V) reference for a 3.3 pro mini and i can get the expected battery level without any voltage divider.

              Another unrelated question i have is : could there be any way to adapt the idea of the readVcc method (which is to measure the internal 1.1V against the Vcc reference to get Vcc) but using any voltage applied to a pin as the reference to again measure the internal 1.1 against it ? This would allow the masurement of any voltage greater than 1.1 without voltage divider while the usual method would be applied for measuring any voltage lower than 1.1 ... what did i miss that makes this impossible ?

              fhenrycoF Offline
              fhenrycoF Offline
              fhenryco
              wrote on last edited by fhenryco
              #92

              i also just realized that there is a special AREF pin intended for what i was thinking about ... but it's not available on the mini pro.

              My measurements using Vcc as Ref have been indeed very fluctuating, however what i get was highly sufficient to monitor the battery feeding a 3.3v step up regulator to the arduino and help anticipate failure

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • skywatchS Offline
                skywatchS Offline
                skywatch
                wrote on last edited by
                #93

                I just noticed another thing that should be changed in the 'relay with button' sketch....

                S_LIGHT should be S_BINARY
                V_LIGHT shoud be V_STATUS

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Offline
                  A Offline
                  APL2017
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #94

                  I would like to clarify operation of the sketch, where more than 1 sensors input are used along with more than 1 relay actuator. in one node

                  1. Does node need unique child ID for each sensor input AND relay output?
                  2. If that is the case how child ID is assigned to relay actuators in the above examples?
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jopebeJ Offline
                    jopebeJ Offline
                    jopebe
                    wrote on last edited by jopebe
                    #95

                    This is a nice sketch and it is very universal for relays. Now m looking for a similar sketch for digital inputs such as buttons i.e.. I would like to join both. The problem: I want to use a mega for reading status of a lot of digital outputs (min.20) of another ISP. It is only High or Low. Only when the level changes, I want the mega send a message to the gateway. I tried this "for" loop, but it didnt help. There are too many informations sent to the gateway. I imagine a solution, where only a change at the pin will create an information, that is sent to the gateway.
                    Here my test, which didnt run:
                    void loop()
                    {

                    for (int sensor=16, pin=BIN_1; sensor<=NUMBER_OF_BIN; sensor++, pin++)
                    {
                    int BUTT;
                    int BUTTOLD;
                    BUTT =digitalRead(pin);
                    if (BUTT != BUTTOLD && BUTT !=0){
                    MyMessage msg(sensor, V_TRIPPED);
                    send(msg.set(BUTT ? "1" : "0"));
                    }
                    BUTTOLD = BUTT;
                    wait (900);
                    }
                    }
                    Has anybody an idea or a hint for me?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • gohanG Offline
                      gohanG Offline
                      gohan
                      Mod
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #96

                      I believe there is a logic error in the sketch as you would need to declare global variables BUTTOLD_XX unique for each button, otherwise how can you keep track of the variable between each loop and FOR iteraction?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jopebeJ Offline
                        jopebeJ Offline
                        jopebe
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #97

                        Thank You for Your quick answer.
                        Do I understand You correctly: I must index the BUTTOLD?
                        As BUTTOLD[pin) for example or how? Where?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • gohanG Offline
                          gohanG Offline
                          gohan
                          Mod
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #98

                          You need to create the single variables one by one, unless somebody else has a better way to do it

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Mitja BlazinsekM Offline
                            Mitja BlazinsekM Offline
                            Mitja Blazinsek
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #99

                            why i can't compile for arduino pro mini on other boards i can upload

                            mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Mitja BlazinsekM Mitja Blazinsek

                              why i can't compile for arduino pro mini on other boards i can upload

                              mfalkviddM Offline
                              mfalkviddM Offline
                              mfalkvidd
                              Mod
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #100

                              @mitja-blazinsek the error messages are usually essential to figuring out. Did you get any?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Mitja BlazinsekM Offline
                                Mitja BlazinsekM Offline
                                Mitja Blazinsek
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #101

                                Arduino: 1.8.1 (Windows 7), Board: "Arduino Pro or Pro Mini, ATmega168 (5V, 16 MHz)"

                                In file included from c:\users\mitja\appdata\local\arduino15\packages\arduino\tools\avr-gcc\4.9.2-atmel3.5.4-arduino2\avr\include\avr\io.h:99:0,

                                             from c:\users\mitja\appdata\local\arduino15\packages\arduino\tools\avr-gcc\4.9.2-atmel3.5.4-arduino2\avr\include\avr\pgmspace.h:90,
                                
                                             from C:\Users\mitja\AppData\Local\Arduino15\packages\arduino\hardware\avr\1.6.20\cores\arduino/Arduino.h:28,
                                
                                             from sketch\button_relay.ino.cpp:1:
                                

                                C:\Users\mitja\Documents\Arduino\libraries\MySensors/hal/architecture/AVR/MyHwAVR.cpp: In function 'bool hwUniqueID(uint8_t (*)[16])':

                                C:\Users\mitja\Documents\Arduino\libraries\MySensors/hal/architecture/AVR/MyHwAVR.cpp:246:26: error: 'SIGRD' was not declared in this scope

                                ((uint8_t)uniqueID) = boot_signature_byte_get(0x00);

                                                      ^
                                

                                C:\Users\mitja\Documents\Arduino\libraries\MySensors/hal/architecture/AVR/MyHwAVR.cpp:247:30: error: 'SIGRD' was not declared in this scope

                                ((uint8_t)uniqueID + 1) = boot_signature_byte_get(0x02);

                                                          ^
                                

                                C:\Users\mitja\Documents\Arduino\libraries\MySensors/hal/architecture/AVR/MyHwAVR.cpp:248:30: error: 'SIGRD' was not declared in this scope

                                ((uint8_t)uniqueID + 2) = boot_signature_byte_get(0x04);

                                                          ^
                                

                                C:\Users\mitja\Documents\Arduino\libraries\MySensors/hal/architecture/AVR/MyHwAVR.cpp:249:30: error: 'SIGRD' was not declared in this scope

                                ((uint8_t)uniqueID + 3) = boot_signature_byte_get(0x01); //OSCCAL

                                                          ^
                                

                                Multiple libraries were found for "Bounce2.h"
                                Used: C:\Users\mitja\Documents\Arduino\libraries\Bounce2
                                Not used: C:\Users\mitja\Documents\Arduino\libraries\Bounce2-master
                                exit status 1
                                Error compiling for board Arduino Pro or Pro Mini.

                                This report would have more information with
                                "Show verbose output during compilation"
                                option enabled in File -> Preferences.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Mitja BlazinsekM Offline
                                  Mitja BlazinsekM Offline
                                  Mitja Blazinsek
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #102

                                  OK it's probaly because ia have mini with 168 chip i have to buys 328 :( again wait 1month to arive from china

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    lekeb
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #103

                                    hello.
                                    I am building a node with several kind of sensors and two relays.
                                    My sensors use CHILD ID from 0 to 3. I would like to start child ID of relay from 4.
                                    How I can't do that with this sketch?
                                    I guess I have to change this part of sketch :
                                    "for (int sensor=1, pin=RELAY_PIN; sensor<=NUMBER_OF_RELAYS; sensor++, pin++) {
                                    // Register all sensors to gw (they will be created as child devices)
                                    present(sensor, S_BINARY);"

                                    correct?

                                    thanks

                                    rejoe2R 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L lekeb

                                      hello.
                                      I am building a node with several kind of sensors and two relays.
                                      My sensors use CHILD ID from 0 to 3. I would like to start child ID of relay from 4.
                                      How I can't do that with this sketch?
                                      I guess I have to change this part of sketch :
                                      "for (int sensor=1, pin=RELAY_PIN; sensor<=NUMBER_OF_RELAYS; sensor++, pin++) {
                                      // Register all sensors to gw (they will be created as child devices)
                                      present(sensor, S_BINARY);"

                                      correct?

                                      thanks

                                      rejoe2R Offline
                                      rejoe2R Offline
                                      rejoe2
                                      wrote on last edited by rejoe2
                                      #104

                                      @lekeb
                                      You may do something like this:
                                      In Header:

                                      uint8_t DS_First_Child_ID = 7; //First Child-ID to be used by Dallas Bus
                                      

                                      an then in presentation():

                                      for (int i = 0; i < numSensors && i < MAX_ATTACHED_DS18B20; i++) {
                                          present(i + DS_First_Child_ID, S_TEMP);
                                      }
                                      

                                      But afaik, it's not recommended to shift the ChildID's for relays but always start with 1. Imo it's better to change the ChildID's of the other attached sensors. You may also take care (in case of shifting ID's) about a consistent mapping from ID to the PINs where the relays are attached.

                                      Controller: FHEM; MySensors: 2.3.1, RS485,nRF24,RFM69, serial Gateways

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • gohanG Offline
                                        gohanG Offline
                                        gohan
                                        Mod
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #105

                                        Agreed, set you sensors to higher ID numbers like 20 or 30 and you are good to go .

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          lekeb
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #106

                                          ok thanks a lot I will try this night

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          16

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular