Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. CNC PCB milling

CNC PCB milling

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
933 Posts 28 Posters 134.2k Views 27 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sundberg84S Offline
    sundberg84S Offline
    sundberg84
    Hardware Contributor
    wrote on last edited by
    #361

    Would this be something good to do? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rVmiRgsI1M
    Cut a complete flat peace of wood with the cnc machine?

    Controller: Proxmox VM - Home Assistant
    MySensors GW: Arduino Uno - W5100 Ethernet, Gw Shield Nrf24l01+ 2,4Ghz
    MySensors GW: Arduino Uno - Gw Shield RFM69, 433mhz
    RFLink GW - Arduino Mega + RFLink Shield, 433mhz

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • rmtuckerR rmtucker

      @neverdie
      I think you should start by altering the acceleration/Max velocity settings etc in grbl.
      Slow them down a little:grinning:

      NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDie
      Hero Member
      wrote on last edited by NeverDie
      #362

      @rmtucker said in CNC PCB milling:

      @neverdie
      I think you should start by altering the acceleration/Max velocity settings etc in grbl.
      Slow them down a little:grinning:

      This was good advice! I arbitrarily reduced both to 50% of their default values, and so far it appears that repositional accuracy has improved.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • rmtuckerR Offline
        rmtuckerR Offline
        rmtucker
        wrote on last edited by
        #363

        Normally i would turn one up at a time until the motors lose steps,then pull them back 20%.

        NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • rmtuckerR rmtucker

          Normally i would turn one up at a time until the motors lose steps,then pull them back 20%.

          NeverDieN Offline
          NeverDieN Offline
          NeverDie
          Hero Member
          wrote on last edited by NeverDie
          #364

          @rmtucker How are you noticing when the motor skips? Is it from noticing a delta in test probe depths?

          Also, what's a reasonable target for repositioning accuracy? i.e. if I set z to zero after doing a test probe, then move it around a bunch, and then return to the same x and y position and drop another test probe, how far off from zero is the second test probe? Presently I only have a few datapoints, but so far it's suggesting maybe a maximum of 0.025mm after having done the 50% reductions, whereas before the reductions (i.e. default values) it was more than 0.05mm (maybe a lot more), which is just too much.

          alt text

          rmtuckerR 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • NeverDieN NeverDie

            @rmtucker How are you noticing when the motor skips? Is it from noticing a delta in test probe depths?

            Also, what's a reasonable target for repositioning accuracy? i.e. if I set z to zero after doing a test probe, then move it around a bunch, and then return to the same x and y position and drop another test probe, how far off from zero is the second test probe? Presently I only have a few datapoints, but so far it's suggesting maybe a maximum of 0.025mm after having done the 50% reductions, whereas before the reductions (i.e. default values) it was more than 0.05mm (maybe a lot more), which is just too much.

            alt text

            rmtuckerR Offline
            rmtuckerR Offline
            rmtucker
            wrote on last edited by
            #365

            @neverdie
            Hmmm how long is a piece of string.:grinning:
            My machine is on a much larger scale but the principal is the same.
            Is this a mechanical inaccuracy or lost steps?
            Make yourself a small program that rapids each axis in turn from one end of the axis to
            the other.
            On my own machine the motors are running pulleys to the leadscrews/ballscrews.
            I place a mark on the pulleys and a pointer (pin and blue tac) when the machine is at 0,0,0.
            I run the program and adjust the accel and velocity returning to 0,0,0 every time and checking the marks always line up.(If they don't lowering the settings 10% and running again).
            Which eventually proves it is not lost steps.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • NeverDieN NeverDie

              @rmtucker How are you noticing when the motor skips? Is it from noticing a delta in test probe depths?

              Also, what's a reasonable target for repositioning accuracy? i.e. if I set z to zero after doing a test probe, then move it around a bunch, and then return to the same x and y position and drop another test probe, how far off from zero is the second test probe? Presently I only have a few datapoints, but so far it's suggesting maybe a maximum of 0.025mm after having done the 50% reductions, whereas before the reductions (i.e. default values) it was more than 0.05mm (maybe a lot more), which is just too much.

              alt text

              rmtuckerR Offline
              rmtuckerR Offline
              rmtucker
              wrote on last edited by
              #366

              @neverdie
              Forget using probe to begin with as this would show lost steps but also any mechanical inaccuracy.
              Just concentrate on the motors to begin with.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • andrewA andrew

                @neverdie once the assembly is done, you should adjust the stepper drivers' current limiting as well.
                it is pololu a4988, you can find the corresponding details here:
                https://www.pololu.com/product/1182

                then, it is always good idea to have the basic settings exported from the board, just in case... you can do it by "$$" command sent from the g code sender gui or directly from the serial terminal.

                currently I use the following settings, the machine might be able to create nice results with higher feed rates, but I did not have enough time to test it and I sticked to the current working config.

                isolation routing with 2001 bits:

                • z cut: -0.05mm
                • feed rate: 200

                you can calculate the V carving bit's tool width for the given milling depth with the following formula:
                tan(bit angle/2) * milling depth * 2 + bit's end width
                for excel formula the bit angle should be provided in radians, so it should look like this
                tan(radians(bit angle/2)) * milling depth * 2 + bit's end width

                edge cut or hole milling with the 0.8mm endmill:

                • feed rate: 170
                • z cut: -1.7mm
                • multi depth, depth/pass: 0.2mm

                drilling:

                • feed rate: 130
                • z cut: -1.8

                the spindle should be 1000 everywhere.

                most probably your board will not have a bootloader, so it will not be possible to update the firmware via usb serial connection (with avrdude), but it is worth to try it. for me it did not work, so I traced back the MCU pins to the pin rows and used ISP to upgrade the firmware to grbl v1.1f (the board will come with 0.9j if I remember correctly). do not forget to export the gerber settings before you upgrade the firmware, as it will loose those, and you have to re-assign the given values again, after the update.

                the ISP pinout (from the pin row's top left corner):
                Reset -> pin 2
                SCK -> pin 3
                MISO -> pin 12
                MOSI -> pin 13

                5v -> pin1
                gnd-> bottom row(!) e.g. pin 1

                0_1513452548391_small_20171021_232839.jpg

                NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDie
                Hero Member
                wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                #367

                @andrew said in CNC PCB milling:

                @neverdie once the assembly is done, you should adjust the stepper drivers' current limiting as well.
                it is pololu a4988, you can find the corresponding details here:
                https://www.pololu.com/product/1182

                Wow, those Pololu directions bear an uncanny resemblance to this:
                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAdvdX88WDs

                Jokes aside, the Jack stepper motors appear to be rated at 1.3A. @andrew Is that what you assumed when calibrating yours? If so, what Vref did you use? Since the motor driver board is a knock-off, it's not obvious what current sense resistor value to use. i.e. 0.050 ohm, 0.068 ohm, or something else?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • NeverDieN NeverDie

                  @andrew Are you planning to provide more detail about how to setup and do double sided PCBs, or is it pretty much RTFM at this point? Just wondering. Your earlier posts were very thorough and helped a lot.

                  andrewA Offline
                  andrewA Offline
                  andrew
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #368

                  @neverdie said in CNC PCB milling:

                  @andrew Are you planning to provide more detail about how to setup and do double sided PCBs, or is it pretty much RTFM at this point? Just wondering. Your earlier posts were very thorough and helped a lot.

                  did you manage to create double sided PCB jobs in the meantime based on my suggestion and on flatcam's documentation? it is not a hardcore process, let me know if you stuck at a given step.

                  regarding to the mentioned upgrades. I agree with @executivul, it doesn't worth to do that with this machine. feedback from steppers, elevation measuring etc are overkill.

                  it's capabilities are more than enough for very precise pcb milling, if you would like to do much more with it, then a different machine could be better instead. if you have issues with the results, then it is configuration / settings / cnc job issue. if you loose steps, then the given stepper driver is not properly adjusted (did you checked the pololu driver configuration from the linked documentation?) or your tool/spindle speed/cutting depth/feed rate is not good for the given job.

                  NeverDieN 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • andrewA andrew

                    @neverdie said in CNC PCB milling:

                    @andrew Are you planning to provide more detail about how to setup and do double sided PCBs, or is it pretty much RTFM at this point? Just wondering. Your earlier posts were very thorough and helped a lot.

                    did you manage to create double sided PCB jobs in the meantime based on my suggestion and on flatcam's documentation? it is not a hardcore process, let me know if you stuck at a given step.

                    regarding to the mentioned upgrades. I agree with @executivul, it doesn't worth to do that with this machine. feedback from steppers, elevation measuring etc are overkill.

                    it's capabilities are more than enough for very precise pcb milling, if you would like to do much more with it, then a different machine could be better instead. if you have issues with the results, then it is configuration / settings / cnc job issue. if you loose steps, then the given stepper driver is not properly adjusted (did you checked the pololu driver configuration from the linked documentation?) or your tool/spindle speed/cutting depth/feed rate is not good for the given job.

                    NeverDieN Offline
                    NeverDieN Offline
                    NeverDie
                    Hero Member
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #369

                    @andrew said in CNC PCB milling:

                    did you checked the pololu driver configuration from the linked documentation?

                    See post immediately above yours.

                    andrewA 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • NeverDieN Offline
                      NeverDieN Offline
                      NeverDie
                      Hero Member
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #370

                      I guess measuring Vref is moot, because jack's stepper motor driver included in the kit (https://www.aliexpress.com/store/product/board/424291_32807192686.html?spm=2114.12010612.0.0.e009a31x1CJ1s) does not have an exposed via hole for measuring Vref.

                      So, that leaves the first Pololu method, which is:

                      The A4988 supports such active current limiting, and the trimmer potentiometer on the board can be used to set the current limit. One way to set the current limit is to put the driver into full-step mode and measure the current running through a single motor coil while adjusting the current limit potentiometer. This should be done with the motor holding a fixed position (i.e. without clocking the STEP input). Note that the current you are measuring is only 70% of the actual current limit setting, since both coils are always on and limited to this value in full-step mode, so if you later enable microstepping modes, the current through the coils will be able to exceed this measured full-step current by 40% (1/0.7) on certain steps; please take this into account when using this method to set the current limit. Also, note that you will need to perform this adjustment again if you ever change the logic voltage, Vdd, since the reference voltage that sets the current limit is a function of Vdd.
                      

                      So, it would appear that in order to put the driver into "single step mode," I must remove the driver board and put it into a test jig (or breadboard) which shorts MS1, MS2, AND MS3 to ground, but otherwise wire up the motor according to this diagram:
                      alt text
                      but connecting the STEP pin to Vcc on the logic power supply (?) so as to allow a fixed, but continuous, current through a single motor coil, which is what will be measured.

                      As to the target current through a single coil that I'll be measuring, I guess it should be (0.7)*1.3=0.91amps?

                      andrewA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • NeverDieN NeverDie

                        @andrew said in CNC PCB milling:

                        did you checked the pololu driver configuration from the linked documentation?

                        See post immediately above yours.

                        andrewA Offline
                        andrewA Offline
                        andrew
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #371

                        @neverdie said in CNC PCB milling:

                        @andrew said in CNC PCB milling:

                        did you checked the pololu driver configuration from the linked documentation?

                        See post immediately above yours.

                        ok, I thought that you already did it, I told it to you long time ago ;)

                        my controller has 0.1ohm Rcs. the steppers are rated to 1.3A, I configured the drivers to 0.9V which limits the stepper's current to 1.125A.

                        NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • NeverDieN NeverDie

                          I guess measuring Vref is moot, because jack's stepper motor driver included in the kit (https://www.aliexpress.com/store/product/board/424291_32807192686.html?spm=2114.12010612.0.0.e009a31x1CJ1s) does not have an exposed via hole for measuring Vref.

                          So, that leaves the first Pololu method, which is:

                          The A4988 supports such active current limiting, and the trimmer potentiometer on the board can be used to set the current limit. One way to set the current limit is to put the driver into full-step mode and measure the current running through a single motor coil while adjusting the current limit potentiometer. This should be done with the motor holding a fixed position (i.e. without clocking the STEP input). Note that the current you are measuring is only 70% of the actual current limit setting, since both coils are always on and limited to this value in full-step mode, so if you later enable microstepping modes, the current through the coils will be able to exceed this measured full-step current by 40% (1/0.7) on certain steps; please take this into account when using this method to set the current limit. Also, note that you will need to perform this adjustment again if you ever change the logic voltage, Vdd, since the reference voltage that sets the current limit is a function of Vdd.
                          

                          So, it would appear that in order to put the driver into "single step mode," I must remove the driver board and put it into a test jig (or breadboard) which shorts MS1, MS2, AND MS3 to ground, but otherwise wire up the motor according to this diagram:
                          alt text
                          but connecting the STEP pin to Vcc on the logic power supply (?) so as to allow a fixed, but continuous, current through a single motor coil, which is what will be measured.

                          As to the target current through a single coil that I'll be measuring, I guess it should be (0.7)*1.3=0.91amps?

                          andrewA Offline
                          andrewA Offline
                          andrew
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #372

                          @neverdie no. you don't have to remove the drivers. you have to measure everything in place.
                          in the mentioned pololu doc/demonstration it is also noted that the given Vref could be measured on the top of the potentiometer (video 3:15)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • andrewA andrew

                            @neverdie said in CNC PCB milling:

                            @andrew said in CNC PCB milling:

                            did you checked the pololu driver configuration from the linked documentation?

                            See post immediately above yours.

                            ok, I thought that you already did it, I told it to you long time ago ;)

                            my controller has 0.1ohm Rcs. the steppers are rated to 1.3A, I configured the drivers to 0.9V which limits the stepper's current to 1.125A.

                            NeverDieN Offline
                            NeverDieN Offline
                            NeverDie
                            Hero Member
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #373

                            @andrew said in CNC PCB milling:

                            ok, I thought that you already did it, I told it to you long time ago

                            It's done now. The default voltages had been about 0.6v. I just now raised them to 0.9v, same as yours. :)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • NeverDieN Offline
                              NeverDieN Offline
                              NeverDie
                              Hero Member
                              wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                              #374

                              How many microsteps are being used, anyway? I'm not sure where that's defined. Apparently these drivers support up 1/16 steps, but it might be that larger steps are actually being used (?). If so, then maybe going to smaller steps would help?

                              I notice one of the Pololu boards has the potential for doing 1/32 steps: https://www.pololu.com/product/2133
                              and might even be drop-in compatible.

                              andrewA 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • NeverDieN NeverDie

                                How many microsteps are being used, anyway? I'm not sure where that's defined. Apparently these drivers support up 1/16 steps, but it might be that larger steps are actually being used (?). If so, then maybe going to smaller steps would help?

                                I notice one of the Pololu boards has the potential for doing 1/32 steps: https://www.pololu.com/product/2133
                                and might even be drop-in compatible.

                                andrewA Offline
                                andrewA Offline
                                andrew
                                wrote on last edited by andrew
                                #375

                                @neverdie said in CNC PCB milling:

                                How many microsteps are being used, anyway? I'm not sure where that's defined. Apparently these drivers support up 1/16 steps, but it might be that fewer are actually being used (?). If so, then maybe going to smaller steps would help?

                                I notice one of the Pololu boards has the potential for doing 1/32 steps: https://www.pololu.com/product/2133
                                and might even be drop-in compatible.

                                this cnc controller board is directly pulls the drivers' MS1,2,3 pins to high, which means that it is "hardcoded" to 1/16 microstep. you really don't need smoother steps than this.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • NeverDieN Offline
                                  NeverDieN Offline
                                  NeverDie
                                  Hero Member
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #376

                                  @andrew Great that you're back. Did you alter your max speed and max acceleration values at all from the defaults? You didn't list them in your earlier list of magic numbers.

                                  andrewA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • NeverDieN NeverDie

                                    @andrew Great that you're back. Did you alter your max speed and max acceleration values at all from the defaults? You didn't list them in your earlier list of magic numbers.

                                    andrewA Offline
                                    andrewA Offline
                                    andrew
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #377

                                    @neverdie I still use my default settings (see below). I re-applied these settings after I flashed the board to grbl 1.1f.
                                    to be honest, after I found the right parameters for the PCB milling jobs I did not went further to fine tune the CNC settings, due to the lack of time. maybe later of the year, but currently I'm more than happy with the results.

                                    $0=10 (step pulse, usec)
                                    $1=25 (step idle delay, msec)
                                    $2=0 (step port invert mask:00000000)
                                    $3=5 (dir port invert mask:00000101)
                                    $4=0 (step enable invert, bool)
                                    $5=0 (limit pins invert, bool)
                                    $6=0 (probe pin invert, bool)
                                    $10=3 (status report mask:00000011)
                                    $11=0.010 (junction deviation, mm)
                                    $12=0.002 (arc tolerance, mm)
                                    $13=0 (report inches, bool)
                                    $20=0 (soft limits, bool)
                                    $21=0 (hard limits, bool)
                                    $22=0 (homing cycle, bool)
                                    $23=0 (homing dir invert mask:00000000)
                                    $24=25.000 (homing feed, mm/min)
                                    $25=500.000 (homing seek, mm/min)
                                    $26=250 (homing debounce, msec)
                                    $27=1.000 (homing pull-off, mm)
                                    $100=800.000 (x, step/mm)
                                    $101=800.000 (y, step/mm)
                                    $102=800.000 (z, step/mm)
                                    $110=800.000 (x max rate, mm/min)
                                    $111=800.000 (y max rate, mm/min)
                                    $112=500.000 (z max rate, mm/min)
                                    $120=10.000 (x accel, mm/sec^2)
                                    $121=10.000 (y accel, mm/sec^2)
                                    $122=10.000 (z accel, mm/sec^2)
                                    $130=200.000 (x max travel, mm)
                                    $131=200.000 (y max travel, mm)
                                    $132=200.000 (z max travel, mm)```
                                    NeverDieN 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • andrewA andrew

                                      @neverdie I still use my default settings (see below). I re-applied these settings after I flashed the board to grbl 1.1f.
                                      to be honest, after I found the right parameters for the PCB milling jobs I did not went further to fine tune the CNC settings, due to the lack of time. maybe later of the year, but currently I'm more than happy with the results.

                                      $0=10 (step pulse, usec)
                                      $1=25 (step idle delay, msec)
                                      $2=0 (step port invert mask:00000000)
                                      $3=5 (dir port invert mask:00000101)
                                      $4=0 (step enable invert, bool)
                                      $5=0 (limit pins invert, bool)
                                      $6=0 (probe pin invert, bool)
                                      $10=3 (status report mask:00000011)
                                      $11=0.010 (junction deviation, mm)
                                      $12=0.002 (arc tolerance, mm)
                                      $13=0 (report inches, bool)
                                      $20=0 (soft limits, bool)
                                      $21=0 (hard limits, bool)
                                      $22=0 (homing cycle, bool)
                                      $23=0 (homing dir invert mask:00000000)
                                      $24=25.000 (homing feed, mm/min)
                                      $25=500.000 (homing seek, mm/min)
                                      $26=250 (homing debounce, msec)
                                      $27=1.000 (homing pull-off, mm)
                                      $100=800.000 (x, step/mm)
                                      $101=800.000 (y, step/mm)
                                      $102=800.000 (z, step/mm)
                                      $110=800.000 (x max rate, mm/min)
                                      $111=800.000 (y max rate, mm/min)
                                      $112=500.000 (z max rate, mm/min)
                                      $120=10.000 (x accel, mm/sec^2)
                                      $121=10.000 (y accel, mm/sec^2)
                                      $122=10.000 (z accel, mm/sec^2)
                                      $130=200.000 (x max travel, mm)
                                      $131=200.000 (y max travel, mm)
                                      $132=200.000 (z max travel, mm)```
                                      NeverDieN Offline
                                      NeverDieN Offline
                                      NeverDie
                                      Hero Member
                                      wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                                      #378

                                      @andrew said in CNC PCB milling:

                                      @neverdie I still use my default settings (see below). I re-applied these settings after I flashed the board to grbl 1.1f.
                                      to be honest, after I found the right parameters for the PCB milling jobs I did not went further to fine tune the CNC settings, due to the lack of time. maybe later of the year, but currently I'm more than happy with the results.

                                      $0=10 (step pulse, usec)
                                      $1=25 (step idle delay, msec)
                                      $2=0 (step port invert mask:00000000)
                                      $3=5 (dir port invert mask:00000101)
                                      $4=0 (step enable invert, bool)
                                      $5=0 (limit pins invert, bool)
                                      $6=0 (probe pin invert, bool)
                                      $10=3 (status report mask:00000011)
                                      $11=0.010 (junction deviation, mm)
                                      $12=0.002 (arc tolerance, mm)
                                      $13=0 (report inches, bool)
                                      $20=0 (soft limits, bool)
                                      $21=0 (hard limits, bool)
                                      $22=0 (homing cycle, bool)
                                      $23=0 (homing dir invert mask:00000000)
                                      $24=25.000 (homing feed, mm/min)
                                      $25=500.000 (homing seek, mm/min)
                                      $26=250 (homing debounce, msec)
                                      $27=1.000 (homing pull-off, mm)
                                      $100=800.000 (x, step/mm)
                                      $101=800.000 (y, step/mm)
                                      $102=800.000 (z, step/mm)
                                      $110=800.000 (x max rate, mm/min)
                                      $111=800.000 (y max rate, mm/min)
                                      $112=500.000 (z max rate, mm/min)
                                      $120=10.000 (x accel, mm/sec^2)
                                      $121=10.000 (y accel, mm/sec^2)
                                      $122=10.000 (z accel, mm/sec^2)
                                      $130=200.000 (x max travel, mm)
                                      $131=200.000 (y max travel, mm)
                                      $132=200.000 (z max travel, mm)```
                                      

                                      Looks like the only difference is that your default max rates for x and y were 800, whereas mine were 5000, and your max rate for z was 500, whereas my default was 800 before I cut it by 50% to 400.

                                      In the interest of minimizing differences, I'll adopt your defaults instead.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • andrewA andrew

                                        @neverdie said in CNC PCB milling:

                                        @andrew Are you planning to provide more detail about how to setup and do double sided PCBs, or is it pretty much RTFM at this point? Just wondering. Your earlier posts were very thorough and helped a lot.

                                        did you manage to create double sided PCB jobs in the meantime based on my suggestion and on flatcam's documentation? it is not a hardcore process, let me know if you stuck at a given step.

                                        regarding to the mentioned upgrades. I agree with @executivul, it doesn't worth to do that with this machine. feedback from steppers, elevation measuring etc are overkill.

                                        it's capabilities are more than enough for very precise pcb milling, if you would like to do much more with it, then a different machine could be better instead. if you have issues with the results, then it is configuration / settings / cnc job issue. if you loose steps, then the given stepper driver is not properly adjusted (did you checked the pololu driver configuration from the linked documentation?) or your tool/spindle speed/cutting depth/feed rate is not good for the given job.

                                        NeverDieN Offline
                                        NeverDieN Offline
                                        NeverDie
                                        Hero Member
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #379

                                        @andrew said in CNC PCB milling:

                                        did you manage to create double sided PCB jobs in the meantime based on my suggestion and on flatcam's documentation? it is not a hardcore process, let me know if you stuck at a given step.

                                        Not sure what kind of pins to use for the alignment.

                                        andrewA 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • NeverDieN Offline
                                          NeverDieN Offline
                                          NeverDie
                                          Hero Member
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #380

                                          Even after all this tweaking, the z-axis was off by 0.048mm after the latest set of probing.

                                          E andrewA 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          12

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular