nRF24Doctor

broomnest

The output of the display could also be sent over serial, but the whole idea is you can walk around with the doctor and improve your results as you go.

ben999

Sorry to necro this old post :(
I have just uploaded @yveaux's version of nRF24 doctor to a Nano.

@Yveaux said in nRF24Doctor:

https://github.com/TechNovation01/nRF24Doctor/blob/master/pcb/nRFDoctor_1.1_sch.pdf

I got all the right libraries installed into IDE (especially LCDMenuLib2.h version 1.2.7, i also tried several other versions close to 1.2.7 just to be sure).
But when compiling i get the following errors :

/tmp/ccMpih6l.ltrans0.ltrans.o: In function `global constructors keyed to 65535_0_nRF24QualityMeter03.ino.cpp.o.3416':
<artificial>:(.text.startup+0x19a): undefined reference to `lcdml_menu_display()'
<artificial>:(.text.startup+0x19c): undefined reference to `lcdml_menu_display()'
<artificial>:(.text.startup+0x1a6): undefined reference to `lcdml_menu_clear()'
<artificial>:(.text.startup+0x1a8): undefined reference to `lcdml_menu_clear()'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
exit status 1
Erreur de compilation pour la carte Arduino Nano

That is a bit above my knowledge. Could someone please point me into the right direction? Could it be just a case of "wrong naming" of variables ?

ben999

I might be able to answer that myself !

Looks like i have forgotten to "combine" a .ino file (CharLcdMenu.ino) with the main one (nRF24DoctorNode.ino), which seems to be a bit like a sub-program.

edit: that's it. Just had to create a second TAB with that sub-program, compile and success.

Please forgive my lack of vocabulary and knowldge, i am a "copy-paste" engineer :D

OldSurferDude

It's great when a project can be brought to life after 8 years!

ben999

@OldSurferDude as long as we’re using nRFs this project is still relevant :D

I am now facing some more troubles:

The nRFNode cannot connect to GW.

Looks like a software issue. The exact same setup connects to GW when loaded with a very basic sketch (relay in my case). I am using @yveaux 's sketch from his Github.
Could this sketch not be compatible with today's API ?

OldSurferDude

@ben999

@ben999 said:

very basic sketch

My guess is that because you're not using the LCD in the basic sketch that talking to the LCD is causing radio interference.

To test this theory and assuming you have the LED connected, the LCD code could be replaced with flash-code code.

My technique for doing this replacement is to use compiler directives to remove the LCD code and add flash-code code.

To remove the LCD code, create a new compiler flag
#define LCD_ENABLE
Surround all LCD code with

#ifdef LCD_ENABLE
...
#endif

Then comment out the definition line which disables the LCD.

Create another new compiler flag
#define FC_PIN 4
and comment out both the compiler directives that create TRIGGER_PIN and LED_PIN

At the point in the existing code where the LCD is to display the quality, put a call to your new routine, This call will pass the quality number to the code that generates a flash code. So this new code can be easily disabled, surround your code with:

#ifndef FC_PIN
...
#endif

Yes, I make a huge assumption that you understand this (compiler directives, flash-code, etc.). If you don't, I, or others, can help out, but you'd learn more if you did it on your own.

ben999

@OldSurferDude thank you very much for taking time to explain.

I didn't make it clear enough from my side though.

My "test" setup here is not the whole "nRF Doctor", as i got fed up with it !!

Last night i just grabbed a Nano and a red nRF (eByte).

Then loaded a random basic sketch and it got connected to GW straight away.

After that i loaded @yveaux 's sketch and it never reached the GW (although changes were made to sketch, such as default channel (76), power level and transmission speed. These changes were made to files located in the "share" directory, that are called via "#include").
Yveaux's sketch is based on API ver 2.2.0... latest stable is 2.3.2. So i tried different versions other than 2.3.2 but they all ended up with errors when compiling.

I'll keep on digging tonight anyway (and report errors).

ben999

Quick update:
-compiling with MySensors librairy ver 2.3.2 gives no error but my simple setup cannot reach GW with the following debug on serial monitor:

0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNNNA---,FQ=16,REL=255,VER=2.3.2
4 MCO:BGN:BFR
35 TSM:INIT
36 TSF:WUR:MS=100
43 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
45 TSM:INIT:STATID=250
47 TSF:SID:OK,ID=250
49 TSM:FPAR
72 ?TSF:MSG:SEND,250-250-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
137 MCO:BGN:STP
151 TSF:WUR:MS=2000
2080 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
2082 TSM:FPAR
2105 ?TSF:MSG:SEND,250-250-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
2166 MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=0
4113 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
4115 TSM:FPAR
4139 ?TSF:MSG:SEND,250-250-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
6147 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
6149 TSM:FPAR
6172 ?TSF:MSG:SEND,250-250-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
8180 !TSM:FPAR:FAIL
8181 TSM:FAIL:CNT=1
8183 TSM:FAIL:DIS
8185 TSF:TDI:TSL
18187 TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
18189 TSM:INIT
18195 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
18197 TSM:INIT:STATID=250
18200 TSF:SID:OK,ID=250
18202 TSM:FPAR
18225 ?TSF:MSG:SEND,250-250-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
20233 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
20235 TSM:FPAR
20258 ?TSF:MSG:SEND,250-250-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
22266 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
22268 TSM:FPAR
22291 ?TSF:MSG:SEND,250-250-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
24299 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
24301 TSM:FPAR
24324 ?TSF:MSG:SEND,250-250-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
26332 !TSM:FPAR:FAIL
26333 TSM:FAIL:CNT=2
26335 TSM:FAIL:DIS
26337 TSF:TDI:TSL
36340 TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
36342 TSM:INIT
36348 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
36350 TSM:INIT:STATID=250
36354 TSF:SID:OK,ID=250
36356 TSM:FPAR
36379 ?TSF:MSG:SEND,250-250-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:

and so on

compiling with MySensors librairy ver 2.2.0 (as mentionned in the sketch) gives me the following error:

Compilation error: 'RF24_PA_LOW' was not declared in this scope

same error with MySensors librairy ver 2.3.0

OldSurferDude

I vaguely remember that the RF24_PA_[power level] was given a different name. to something different. Basically the power level is 0,1,2, or 3 (MIN, LOW, HIGH, or MAX). see docs

To get it to compile, put this (a hack) line in
#define RF24_PA_LOW 1
before line 47
#include "shared/RadioConfig.h"
or before
radio.setPALevel(RF24_PA_LOW);

I had forgotten about this. Maybe the problem is that that power level is set to low. I see in RadioConfig.h it's set to LOW. This is done because the two radios could be close to one another and they would overdrive the other if they're set to MAX

Another thought (my little gray cells are not firing on all cylinders) It seems to me that line 47
#include "shared/RadioConfig.h"
should be after line 59
#include <MySensors.h>
because the MySensors library is where the PA variables are set.

I hope my rambling here hasn't further complicated the issue.

ben999

@OldSurferDude thanks once again for taking time to understand my problem !

Moving

#include "shared/RadioConfig.h"

after

#include <MySensors.h>

got me the following compile error

In file included from /home/ben/Documents/Arduino/nRF24QualityMeter03/nRF24QualityMeter03.ino:58:0:
/home/ben/Arduino/libraries/MySensors/MySensors.h:426:2: error: #error No forward link or gateway feature activated. This means nowhere to send messages! Pretty pointless.
 #error No forward link or gateway feature activated. This means nowhere to send messages! Pretty pointless.
  ^~~~~
exit status 1

Compilation error: exit status 1

nRF24Doctor

8

12.0k

11.2k

113.4k