!TSM:FPAR:FAIL node and gateway communication problems?

[agtig]

@Fabien I am not using a controller. Can it run alone, or can I set up the Arduino Mega gateway as a controller as well?

[agtig]

I have hooked up the Arduino Pro mini with the sensor to a laboratory power supply, which should be very precise. No change in the log...

0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNNNA--,VER=2.1.0
4 TSM:INIT
4 TSF:WUR:MS=0
12 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
14 TSF:SID:OK,ID=3
16 TSM:FPAR
114 TSF:MSG:SEND,3-3-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
2123 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
2125 TSM:FPAR
2226 TSF:MSG:SEND,3-3-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
4235 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
4237 TSM:FPAR
4337 TSF:MSG:SEND,3-3-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
6346 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
6348 TSM:FPAR
6449 TSF:MSG:SEND,3-3-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
8458 !TSM:FPAR:FAIL
8460 TSM:FAIL:CNT=1
8462 TSM:FAIL:PDT
18466 TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT

Will try with a larger capacitor, even though I don't think it will do much difference, when I use this power supply...

[agtig]

Tried with a ceramic 47 micro farad condenser to no avail...

[mfalkvidd]

@agtig could you post the debug log from your gateway?
Edit: sorry, I see that you already did.

[agtig]

@mfalkvidd Kind of... Here is the log of the gateway in full length ;-)

0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:INIT GW,CP=RNNGA--,VER=2.1.0
0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT
0;255;3;0;9;TSF:WUR:MS=0
0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT:TSP OK
0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT:GW MODE
0;255;3;0;9;TSM:READY:ID=0,PAR=0,DIS=0
0;255;3;0;9;MCO:REG:NOT NEEDED
0;255;3;0;14;Gateway startup complete.
0;255;0;0;18;2.1.0
0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:STP
0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1

If this helps... I will try using the older version of the sketch for both the sensor and the gateway...

[agtig]

Now I downgraded to version 2.0, but the same problem remains.
It seems that the problem resides with the sensor?
At least it is the sensor that complains...
Or is my problem that I am trying to run this without a controller?

TSM:PDT
TSM:INIT
TSM:RADIO:OK
TSP:ASSIGNID:OK (ID=254)
TSM:FPAR
TSP:MSG:SEND 254-254-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=bc:
TSM:FPAR
TSP:MSG:SEND 254-254-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=bc:
TSM:FPAR
TSP:MSG:SEND 254-254-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=bc:
TSM:FPAR
TSP:MSG:SEND 254-254-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=bc:
!TSM:FPAR:FAIL
!TSM:FAILURE

[Fabien]

did you try https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/666/debug-faq-and-how-ask-for-help
According with this flowchart, you can try to change radio on node.

[agtig]

I have now rewired all the cables, and made it neat, plus changed the radio, but nothing helps...
I still get a:

!TSM:FFPAR:FAIL
!TSM:FAILURE

[gohan]

I am joining discussione as I have same problem. Here is the sensor node running on a Mega2560 with sketch MotionSensor from Mysensors examples

0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNNNA--,VER=2.1.0
3 TSM:INIT
4 TSF:WUR:MS=0
11 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
13 TSM:INIT:STATID=2
14 TSF:SID:OK,ID=2
16 TSM:FPAR
1615 TSF:MSG:SEND,2-2-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
3623 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
3625 TSM:FPAR
5225 TSF:MSG:SEND,2-2-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
7232 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
7234 TSM:FPAR
8834 TSF:MSG:SEND,2-2-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
10841 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
10843 TSM:FPAR
12442 TSF:MSG:SEND,2-2-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
14449 !TSM:FPAR:FAIL
14450 TSM:FAIL:CNT=1
14452 TSM:FAIL:PDT
24455 TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT

This is gateway running on a UNO with sketch Serial Gateway from MySensors examples

0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:INIT GW,CP=RNNGA--,VER=2.1.0
0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT
0;255;3;0;9;TSF:WUR:MS=0
0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT:TSP OK
0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT:GW MODE
0;255;3;0;9;TSM:READY:ID=0,PAR=0,DIS=0
0;255;3;0;9;MCO:REG:NOT NEEDED
0;255;3;0;14;Gateway startup complete.
0;255;0;0;18;2.1.0
0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:STP
0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
0;255;3;0;9;TSF:SAN:OK

I tried with both a power regulator for NRF24 and with a 10uF on both sides.

[David]

Hi all,
are you with Arduino IDE 1.8.0 ?
If yes did you try to downgrade the AVR version of Arduino 1.8.0 ?
Check the last two posts in this thread: https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/4801/building-an-ethernet-gateway/15

I'm not sure it will solve the problem but not bad to try.

[agtig]

@David Well, I just saw an update to the boards had been released, so first I tried updating that, but resulting in the same error.
Then I downgraded the boards to version 1.6.11 as recommended in the thread you linked to, but still resulting in the same error.

But thanks for the tip... Well, am really scratching my head on this problem.

<>
Can anyone verify that a controller is not needed for the communication between the sensor and the gateway to work?
<>

[agtig]

It seems to me that the sensor is trying to find a parent, but fails?

[mfalkvidd]

Can anyone verify that a controller is not needed for the communication between the sensor and the gateway to work?

A controller is needed for dynamic id assignment. Since you are using static id a controller is not requored. The node should find its parent (= the gateway unless you have repeater(s)) anyway.

[agtig]

@mfalkvidd Should both the gateway and the sensor have static id's? (different of course)

[mfalkvidd]

@agtig a gateway always has the static id 0. So yes they will both have static id to work without a controller.

[agtig]

I just found this other forum post, which might be the answer to my issues: https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/5671/loosing-my-mind-sensor-not-talking-to-esp-gw-latest-2-2-0-beta/2

I too have bought the radios with a blob instead of an IC.

I too have ordered different radios - the ones that are recommended here in the shop.
Had just hoped to be able to figure out how to get the ones I have to work. If anyone have any other ideas, or would like me to post some code, please let me know. I am running pretty standard from the example, only added MY_NODE_ID in the top...

[gohan]

I sent back my radios with blob and ordered other with IC: according to users' feedback they are working.

[gohan]

i got the new NRF24 modules and it looks they are working. it looks like they are clones but at least I am not getting errors on startup like the others. For reference on the chip the code is 1609AH

PS I did some tests on range with RF24_PA_MAX but I can get maximum 6-7 meters on same floor with 2 walls. Not as much as I would have expected.

[xelnaha]

@agtig said:

https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/5671/loosing-my-mind-sensor-not-talking-to-esp-gw-latest-2-2-0-beta/2

I have been pulling my hairs out too; whatever I did no joy. I also have the ones with the blob and i'm happy I got back here. Static node, no joy whatsoever. I am looking for the IC nodes now, just need to find a reputable seller as I thought I was buying the IC ones, but eventually was sent the blob cloned ones.

luckily i complained and said what I was sent was fake and got my money back.

[tboha]

Maybe you should give

#define MY_RF24_PA_LEVEL RF24_PA_MIN

a try.
Being short of NRF modules, I ordered 10 pcs from my trusted EBAY-Seller for about 6.5€. What a disappointing experience - none of the modules did its work. All failed with

!TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY

10 defective modules in a row? Not likely. Clones? "Second source"? Fake? - maybe. So back to the roots, digging out maniacbug's library, uploading test sketches (pingpair_ack) - and ... no communication.
Regarding debug output the only difference between working and dysfunctional modules was PA_LEVEL (PA_LOW vs. PA_MAX). So switching to PA_MIN resulted in almost flawless communication arround 5-7m (inhouse with much armoured concrete, not noticeably different from "working" NRF modules).
Reducing PA_LEVEL is advised frequently in this forum, but I never thought of reducing to PA_MIN.
Interesting observation: increasing PA_LEVEL from PA_MIN to PA_LOW resulted in way much higher Round-Trip-Times (6000µs vs 650µs) and some failures (indicating bad transmissions), increasing to PA_LEVEL to PA_HIGH broke communication completely.

So recompiling Mysensors sketches with RF24_PA_MIN did the trick, the probably "fake" modules are doing their job.