Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. Radio problems

Radio problems

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
1.4b1nrf24l01+pa+lna
25 Posts 8 Posters 15.8k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jocke4uJ
    jocke4uJ
    jocke4u
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Thank you for all your answers.
    I think I have a couple of "AMS1117 5V-3.3V Step Down Module" (or similar) that I can connect to a USB charger. Need to verify though.
    http://www.ebay.com/itm/261172232237 says "output: 3.3 V, 800 mA"

    Some hacks to do :)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jocke4uJ
      jocke4uJ
      jocke4u
      wrote on last edited by
      #16

      Hi again,
      First I would like to thank you all for the support/ideas etc and I really want to get sensors stable and reliable. Sure this EnergyMeterPulseSensor is not the most critical one and sure the sketch can be improved not to loose KWH readings/accumulations (Watts is a snapshot) when send fails. But with more critical sensors where something else is triggered.
      Anyway, since I have problem with the EnergyMeterPulseSensor sending data (not counting pulses) I need to get that working and set the "foundation" for future sensors. Sure I have some other test sensors...

      Yesterday I took the following actions.
      EnergyMeterPulseSensor

      • Reverted back to NRF24L01+ due to lower power consumtion
      • Still using 47 uF capacitor to radio power
      • Reverted back to the standard code with gw.begin(incomingMessage); (not using RF24_PA_LOW)

      Gateway

      • Still using NRF24L01+PA+LNA
      • Still using 47 uF capacitor to radio power
      • Added AMS1117 5V-3.3V Step Down Module connected to a separate USB charger feeding the radio
      • Reverted back to the standard code with gw.begin(); not using RF24_PA_LOW

      But unfortunately no success.

      So I wonder what you have as hardware reference architecture;

      • Do you have a verified and reliable solution?
      • What components do you use?
      • What working distance do you have between gateway-sensors ?

      Regards
      Joacim

      RJ_MakeR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jocke4uJ jocke4u

        Hi again,
        First I would like to thank you all for the support/ideas etc and I really want to get sensors stable and reliable. Sure this EnergyMeterPulseSensor is not the most critical one and sure the sketch can be improved not to loose KWH readings/accumulations (Watts is a snapshot) when send fails. But with more critical sensors where something else is triggered.
        Anyway, since I have problem with the EnergyMeterPulseSensor sending data (not counting pulses) I need to get that working and set the "foundation" for future sensors. Sure I have some other test sensors...

        Yesterday I took the following actions.
        EnergyMeterPulseSensor

        • Reverted back to NRF24L01+ due to lower power consumtion
        • Still using 47 uF capacitor to radio power
        • Reverted back to the standard code with gw.begin(incomingMessage); (not using RF24_PA_LOW)

        Gateway

        • Still using NRF24L01+PA+LNA
        • Still using 47 uF capacitor to radio power
        • Added AMS1117 5V-3.3V Step Down Module connected to a separate USB charger feeding the radio
        • Reverted back to the standard code with gw.begin(); not using RF24_PA_LOW

        But unfortunately no success.

        So I wonder what you have as hardware reference architecture;

        • Do you have a verified and reliable solution?
        • What components do you use?
        • What working distance do you have between gateway-sensors ?

        Regards
        Joacim

        RJ_MakeR
        RJ_MakeR
        RJ_Make
        Hero Member
        wrote on last edited by
        #17

        @jocke4u
        Have you tried MySensors 1.3b yet?

        RJ_Make

        jocke4uJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • RJ_MakeR RJ_Make

          @jocke4u
          Have you tried MySensors 1.3b yet?

          jocke4uJ
          jocke4uJ
          jocke4u
          wrote on last edited by
          #18

          @ServiceXp
          I have had 1.3b before but without capacitor etc.
          Maybe time to go back to 1.3b3, to see if that works better.

          RJ_MakeR 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jocke4uJ jocke4u

            @ServiceXp
            I have had 1.3b before but without capacitor etc.
            Maybe time to go back to 1.3b3, to see if that works better.

            RJ_MakeR
            RJ_MakeR
            RJ_Make
            Hero Member
            wrote on last edited by
            #19

            @jocke4u
            At least In my environment, I had zero communication problems with v1.3. Can't say that about 1.4.

            RJ_Make

            YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • RJ_MakeR RJ_Make

              @jocke4u
              At least In my environment, I had zero communication problems with v1.3. Can't say that about 1.4.

              YveauxY
              YveauxY
              Yveaux
              Mod
              wrote on last edited by
              #20

              @ServiceXp said:

              Can't say that about 1.4.

              Do you mean you're having problems with 1.4 then or did you just not have any experience with it yet?

              http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

              RJ_MakeR 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jocke4uJ
                jocke4uJ
                jocke4u
                wrote on last edited by
                #21

                DAMN :( :(
                I think dataMine played a prank on me and the statistic is probably not correct (not logging everything). Will hook in my MQTT monitor to extract statistics in a way I control it.
                Currently I am running 1.3b3 and will run a test sensor for a while to see how it's works and then eventually go for 1.4 again.
                Thanks for your support and I have learnt more about power and capacitors :)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • YveauxY Yveaux

                  @ServiceXp said:

                  Can't say that about 1.4.

                  Do you mean you're having problems with 1.4 then or did you just not have any experience with it yet?

                  RJ_MakeR
                  RJ_MakeR
                  RJ_Make
                  Hero Member
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #22

                  @Yveaux
                  I think both.. The radio problems I had drove me crazy, and then there's still the temps not converting to F using the existing 1.4b library. Which is not a big problem thanks to @hek help.

                  I literately had zero issues with the 1.3b library.

                  RJ_Make

                  YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • RJ_MakeR RJ_Make

                    @Yveaux
                    I think both.. The radio problems I had drove me crazy, and then there's still the temps not converting to F using the existing 1.4b library. Which is not a big problem thanks to @hek help.

                    I literately had zero issues with the 1.3b library.

                    YveauxY
                    YveauxY
                    Yveaux
                    Mod
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #23

                    @ServiceXp I'm not aware of any major issues with 1.4 at the moment and @hek is about to tag it. If you are really having (radio) issues related to 1.4 we should fix them asap.

                    http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                    RJ_MakeR 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • YveauxY Yveaux

                      @ServiceXp I'm not aware of any major issues with 1.4 at the moment and @hek is about to tag it. If you are really having (radio) issues related to 1.4 we should fix them asap.

                      RJ_MakeR
                      RJ_MakeR
                      RJ_Make
                      Hero Member
                      wrote on last edited by RJ_Make
                      #24

                      @Yveaux

                      At this point I think I found the solution, but have not built up another test bed to make sure the solution worked. The temp conversion problem is persistent,

                      http://forum.mysensors.org/topic/309/1-4b-radio-transmission-problem-not-present-in-1-3b

                      RJ_Make

                      YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • RJ_MakeR RJ_Make

                        @Yveaux

                        At this point I think I found the solution, but have not built up another test bed to make sure the solution worked. The temp conversion problem is persistent,

                        http://forum.mysensors.org/topic/309/1-4b-radio-transmission-problem-not-present-in-1-3b

                        YveauxY
                        YveauxY
                        Yveaux
                        Mod
                        wrote on last edited by Yveaux
                        #25

                        @ServiceXp you said in this post:

                        That was it!!!!! I tried 22uF, was still doggie, so I thought why not move up to 47uF wink and what do you know, that seems to be the winning value. I have some more testing, but looking pretty good so far.

                        This sounds to me that the issue is solved...
                        I can imagine that 1.4 requires a bigger cap while 1.3 doesn't. 1.4 uses auto acknowledge which can send burst packets. This could put a bigger load on your power supply.

                        http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        15

                        Online

                        12.4k

                        Users

                        11.2k

                        Topics

                        113.4k

                        Posts


                        Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • MySensors
                        • OpenHardware.io
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular