Ethernet vs Serial gateway performance.
-
I haven't got any ethernet gateways unfortunately. these posts have some cluses though:
http://forum.mysensors.org/topic/594/arduino-yun-linino-openwrt/14
http://forum.mysensors.org/topic/2437/step-by-step-procedure-to-connect-the-nrf24l01-to-the-gpio-pins-and-use-the-raspberry-as-a-serial-gateway/10 -
I haven't got any ethernet gateways unfortunately. these posts have some cluses though:
http://forum.mysensors.org/topic/594/arduino-yun-linino-openwrt/14
http://forum.mysensors.org/topic/2437/step-by-step-procedure-to-connect-the-nrf24l01-to-the-gpio-pins-and-use-the-raspberry-as-a-serial-gateway/10@mfalkvidd Thanks for the links.
So this means that you have no trouble using serial gateway or you mean your setup is using raspberry pi + nrf like the second link ?
-
@ahmedadelhosni I think it is a matter of taste. You can either emulate GW with a software or have it separate (Ethernet). With the latest RPi 3 performance is not an issue.
Personally, I like Ethernet GW for several reasons. 1) Serial GW was lacking development (MYS 1.4 ver) 2) If there are software issues (like 100% processor usage) you won't be able to receive/send anything.
-
-
@ahmedadelhosni I think it is a matter of taste. You can either emulate GW with a software or have it separate (Ethernet). With the latest RPi 3 performance is not an issue.
Personally, I like Ethernet GW for several reasons. 1) Serial GW was lacking development (MYS 1.4 ver) 2) If there are software issues (like 100% processor usage) you won't be able to receive/send anything.
-
@alexsh1 I have not used MYS yet. Isnt it for OTA updates ?
-
@mfalkvidd 5 ? What 5 :) ?
@ahmedadelhosni said:
@mfalkvidd 5 ? What 5 :) ?
Yes :-) One at home, four at work in different offices (Göteborg, Stockholm, Münich and Tulsa)
-
@ahmedadelhosni said:
@mfalkvidd 5 ? What 5 :) ?
Yes :-) One at home, four at work in different offices (Göteborg, Stockholm, Münich and Tulsa)
@mfalkvidd since your first answer I was wondering what could you do at home with 5 GW !!!
Thanks for clearifying things up :) -
@ahmedadelhosni said:
@mfalkvidd 5 ? What 5 :) ?
Yes :-) One at home, four at work in different offices (Göteborg, Stockholm, Münich and Tulsa)
-
@mfalkvidd that's a lot of plants to monitor :bowtie:
@Yveaux Indeed. I've got requests from one partner in New York and one in California as well, will configure gw's for them and ship next week. Next up is Bangalore, India. It is a really fun project :)
Status for the plants can be seen live here if anyone is curious. Just click the big "PRESS HERE TO ACCESS THE DEMO SYSTEM" button and you'll be logged in.Screen dump:
-
@Yveaux Indeed. I've got requests from one partner in New York and one in California as well, will configure gw's for them and ship next week. Next up is Bangalore, India. It is a really fun project :)
Status for the plants can be seen live here if anyone is curious. Just click the big "PRESS HERE TO ACCESS THE DEMO SYSTEM" button and you'll be logged in.Screen dump:
-
WOOOW :) This is really great.
I do really want to switch to pi + nrf like in your tutorial, but I need to add signing ( as I have asked before ) :)
Maybe I will begin first with running it and then see how to enable the singing.THanks for your help.
-
I have Domoticz with a RFlink (433mhz kit with aurel transiever on a arduino mega). Its connected to my raspberry pi 2 with Jessie trough USB. This works great. Domoticz always sees the RFlink kit, and communication works flawless.
After reading al lot about mysensors i ordered a whole lot of of arduino and nRF24L01stuff. After reading this topic, i still dont see any real reasons for choosing USB(serial) or Ethernet.
- I will place my mysensors gateway next to my Raspberry with Jessie
- For not i only want to acces my nRF24L01 mysensor network with Domoticz
- Power usage should be as low as possible
- Connecting the gateway with Domoticz should be as plug and play as possible
- I dont care about the extra costs of a ethernet gateway
Next to the above, i have a small preference for a USB gateway, so i dont have to be carefull with IP addresses, configs, etc.
What are the advantages or disadvantages between a USB(serial) gateway, and a Ethernet gateway? I'm planning to use a Arduino nano, or a UNO.
Your advice is very welcome!
-
I have Domoticz with a RFlink (433mhz kit with aurel transiever on a arduino mega). Its connected to my raspberry pi 2 with Jessie trough USB. This works great. Domoticz always sees the RFlink kit, and communication works flawless.
After reading al lot about mysensors i ordered a whole lot of of arduino and nRF24L01stuff. After reading this topic, i still dont see any real reasons for choosing USB(serial) or Ethernet.
- I will place my mysensors gateway next to my Raspberry with Jessie
- For not i only want to acces my nRF24L01 mysensor network with Domoticz
- Power usage should be as low as possible
- Connecting the gateway with Domoticz should be as plug and play as possible
- I dont care about the extra costs of a ethernet gateway
Next to the above, i have a small preference for a USB gateway, so i dont have to be carefull with IP addresses, configs, etc.
What are the advantages or disadvantages between a USB(serial) gateway, and a Ethernet gateway? I'm planning to use a Arduino nano, or a UNO.
Your advice is very welcome!
@Kristiaan-Nugteren said:
What are the advantages or disadvantages between a USB(serial) gateway, and a Ethernet gateway? I'm planning to use a Arduino nano, or a UNO.
This is really a loaded question. I suppose there are pros and cons - personally I wanted to have a separate GW with an IP address. Additionally, the Ethernet GW is updated regularly. Pros of a serial GW are 1) simplicity 2) all in one design 3) no need for a separate box/PSU. On the other hand, it is not updated regularly. I think the latest software when I looked at it in December 2015 was MySensors v1.4
-
On the other hand, it is not updated regularly
I don't really understand the argumentation here, why should the serial gateway be updated regularity? It's a good sign you don't have to do frequent updates of it.
The serial gateway is much simpler than the ethernet variant => Less can go wrong. :)
-
I am not suggesting this is good or bad. This is the fact that one has got 1.5 or 1.6 (dev) and the other one only 1.4 unless anything changed.
I did experience issues with the serial set-up. I think it is due to the fact that I have multiple scripts running on my RPi and it was more due to one of those scripts taking too much processing power and not due to the serial software.
-
@alexsh1 What do you mean by not updates regulary ? You mean it updates on serial interrupts while ethernet is always running in a loop ?
-
@Kristiaan-Nugteren said:
What are the advantages or disadvantages between a USB(serial) gateway, and a Ethernet gateway? I'm planning to use a Arduino nano, or a UNO.
This is really a loaded question. I suppose there are pros and cons - personally I wanted to have a separate GW with an IP address. Additionally, the Ethernet GW is updated regularly. Pros of a serial GW are 1) simplicity 2) all in one design 3) no need for a separate box/PSU. On the other hand, it is not updated regularly. I think the latest software when I looked at it in December 2015 was MySensors v1.4
So what kind of updates do these gateways get? Are these needed to improve stability and security? If yes, its understandable that the ethernet gateway needs more updates.
If the updates bring new functionality and compatibility for the gateways, it's of course a very good reason to those the version that gets the most updates.
If i design a new sensor, or copy a new design, what part of the software will be responsible for the sensor to show up in domoticz?
- Does the gateway runs software that needs to be compatible with the sensor? So if i design a new sensor, lets say a weight scale, will the gateway process units in KG?
- I run domoticz on my Raspberry with Jessie. Do i need to add new code or software to the Raspberry to work, or doesn't the raspberry run any mysensor software at all? (Just the serial USB software)
- Will domotics be responsible to recognize the type of sensor? So will new type of sensor require a update or heavy customization on the build-in mysensor software?
Depending on what part of the software handles what, it can be very important to take the gateway with the most updates.
-
Gateways don't have much intelligence. They forward all information. The 1.4 gateway works perfectly with sensors running 1.5.x. You can see it a bit like your home router. You don't need to upgrade your router if you upgrade your computer from Windows XP to Windows 10.
If there are upgrades to the MySensors serial protocol, the gateway might need to be upgraded, just like you might need to upgrade your home router if you want to use ipv6. One such example is signing, which requires 1.5. If you want to use signing, you need a 1.5 gateway. If you don't use signing, 1.4 works fine even with the new sensor/variable types that were introduced in 1.5 (V_TEXT/S_INFO for example).
Hope this helps.
