Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Announcements
  3. 💬 Battery Powered Sensors

💬 Battery Powered Sensors

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
battery
347 Posts 55 Posters 67.1k Views 53 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • parachutesjP Offline
    parachutesjP Offline
    parachutesj
    wrote on last edited by
    #29

    Hi,
    I just built the circuit which is explained in the thread with a Pro Mini 3.3 8 mHz
    So far so good, I can read the voltage of the battery etc but my problem is, it consumes about 1.2 mA while in sleep, this is about factor 10 of the findings from the thread.
    I just copied the code 1:1
    Any glue what could be wrong or what get others with that setup? The Arduino is not modified at all.

    Thanks
    SJ

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • parachutesjP parachutesj

      Hi,
      I just built the circuit which is explained in the thread with a Pro Mini 3.3 8 mHz
      So far so good, I can read the voltage of the battery etc but my problem is, it consumes about 1.2 mA while in sleep, this is about factor 10 of the findings from the thread.
      I just copied the code 1:1
      Any glue what could be wrong or what get others with that setup? The Arduino is not modified at all.

      Thanks
      SJ

      N Offline
      N Offline
      Nicklas Starkel
      wrote on last edited by
      #30

      @parachutesj you have to modify the pro mini. Remove the power led according to instructions!

      parachutesjP 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • N Nicklas Starkel

        @parachutesj you have to modify the pro mini. Remove the power led according to instructions!

        parachutesjP Offline
        parachutesjP Offline
        parachutesj
        wrote on last edited by
        #31

        @Nicklas-Starkel thank you. If one could read...
        I read the description again and thought that it should be 120uA stock and when removing LED and regulator it will even go down further but thinking about it, how should at base 120 uA and removing LED save additional 1.5mA???? LOL, sorry was a long day.

        My Fluke reads 0.044 mA in sleep now (without LED). Sweet!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          Nicklas Starkel
          wrote on last edited by
          #32

          Another battery related question that I really do not understand.
          Are there different versions on how to read battery consumption?

          I see some sketches uses:

          long readVcc() {
            long result;
            // Read 1.1V reference against AVcc
            ADMUX = _BV(REFS0) | _BV(MUX3) | _BV(MUX2) | _BV(MUX1);
            delay(2); // Wait for Vref to settle
            noInterrupts ();
            // start the conversion
            ADCSRA |= _BV (ADSC) | _BV (ADIE);
            set_sleep_mode (SLEEP_MODE_ADC);    // sleep during sample
            interrupts ();
            sleep_mode (); 
            // reading should be done, but better make sure
            // maybe the timer interrupt fired 
            while (bit_is_set(ADCSRA,ADSC));
            result = ADCL;
            result |= ADCH<<8;
            result = 1126400L / result; // Back-calculate AVcc in mV```
          

          However some (like the original one in this thread) uses:

           int sensorValue = analogRead(BATTERY_SENSE_PIN);
          

          Is it due to different libraries or maybe it is the same but just programming wise different?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G Offline
            G Offline
            gloob
            wrote on last edited by
            #33

            If you are using the first sketch you dont have to use a seperate pin to measure the input voltage. There are also no resistors.

            You can run this on a bare ATmega with minimal hardware.

            N 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G gloob

              If you are using the first sketch you dont have to use a seperate pin to measure the input voltage. There are also no resistors.

              You can run this on a bare ATmega with minimal hardware.

              N Offline
              N Offline
              Nicklas Starkel
              wrote on last edited by
              #34

              @gloob thanks!
              One would think running with no resistors and not using a separate PIN would be better.

              @hek or @mfalkvidd , any comments as to why the original sketch is preferred over the other 'way' in this article?

              hekH 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Nicklas Starkel

                @gloob thanks!
                One would think running with no resistors and not using a separate PIN would be better.

                @hek or @mfalkvidd , any comments as to why the original sketch is preferred over the other 'way' in this article?

                hekH Offline
                hekH Offline
                hek
                Admin
                wrote on last edited by
                #35

                @Nicklas-Starkel

                https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/186/new-library-to-read-arduino-vcc-supply-level-without-resistors-for-battery-powered-sensor-nodes-that-do-not-use-a-voltage-regulator-but-connect-directly-to-the-batteries

                N 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • hekH hek

                  @Nicklas-Starkel

                  https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/186/new-library-to-read-arduino-vcc-supply-level-without-resistors-for-battery-powered-sensor-nodes-that-do-not-use-a-voltage-regulator-but-connect-directly-to-the-batteries

                  N Offline
                  N Offline
                  Nicklas Starkel
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #36

                  @hek , I've read that post several times :)
                  Since it was so outdated (2 years) I naturally assumed the 'battery powering article' was a newer way to do it (especially since mys2.0).
                  Also, the post you linked to is attributed if you use no voltage regulator.
                  And in the article this is also one of the things you are recommended to remove, hence making it even more confusing as to why the article describes another way than the post.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • Meshx86M Offline
                    Meshx86M Offline
                    Meshx86
                    wrote on last edited by Meshx86
                    #37

                    i just want to get this once and for all, so others coming by gets it directly instead of going through all the 2 threads posts, please correct me if i am wrong:

                    1- using the voltage divider is needed if there is a voltage regulator / booster where where VBatt != Vcc.
                    2- using the voltage regulator is not needed if the voltage regulator is removed / no booster is used (powering directly from 2 x AA batteries) where VBatt == Vcc.

                    *I've noticed the 2nd method requires inputting battrie's DMM measured values vs arduino ones for correction, is this a down side if you need to change the battery later on ? or is it just programmed once ? and does the 1st method rquirs these corrections too ?

                    Cheers

                    GertSandersG 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Meshx86M Meshx86

                      i just want to get this once and for all, so others coming by gets it directly instead of going through all the 2 threads posts, please correct me if i am wrong:

                      1- using the voltage divider is needed if there is a voltage regulator / booster where where VBatt != Vcc.
                      2- using the voltage regulator is not needed if the voltage regulator is removed / no booster is used (powering directly from 2 x AA batteries) where VBatt == Vcc.

                      *I've noticed the 2nd method requires inputting battrie's DMM measured values vs arduino ones for correction, is this a down side if you need to change the battery later on ? or is it just programmed once ? and does the 1st method rquirs these corrections too ?

                      Cheers

                      GertSandersG Offline
                      GertSandersG Offline
                      GertSanders
                      Hardware Contributor
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #38

                      @Meshx86
                      actually, you need a voltage divider if the voltage to be measured is above the maximum allowed by the processor at the speed you are running it.

                      If Vcc is 5V, then any voltage above 5V should be measured via a voltage divider.
                      If Vcc is 3.3V same principle, but you could get away with measuring 5V directly (would not kill the processor), but your values may be off.

                      Meshx86M 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • GertSandersG GertSanders

                        @Meshx86
                        actually, you need a voltage divider if the voltage to be measured is above the maximum allowed by the processor at the speed you are running it.

                        If Vcc is 5V, then any voltage above 5V should be measured via a voltage divider.
                        If Vcc is 3.3V same principle, but you could get away with measuring 5V directly (would not kill the processor), but your values may be off.

                        Meshx86M Offline
                        Meshx86M Offline
                        Meshx86
                        wrote on last edited by Meshx86
                        #39

                        @GertSanders following the instructions of this post suggest using Alkaline batteries (apparently Li-ion aren't a good idea for sensor nodes ?! plus they are expensive), the optimal solution would be using 2 x AA batteries as some ans this post suggested.

                        I believe there is no way 2 x AA batteries in series would measure anywhere near 3.3v, the max i measured with brand new batteries was 3.2v.

                        my major concern is:
                        would i still need to the do the voltage corrections when using the voltage divider ? if so, does that need to be reprogrammed every time you replace the battery ?

                        sorry to bring this again @Yveaux @axillent

                        GertSandersG 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Meshx86M Meshx86

                          @GertSanders following the instructions of this post suggest using Alkaline batteries (apparently Li-ion aren't a good idea for sensor nodes ?! plus they are expensive), the optimal solution would be using 2 x AA batteries as some ans this post suggested.

                          I believe there is no way 2 x AA batteries in series would measure anywhere near 3.3v, the max i measured with brand new batteries was 3.2v.

                          my major concern is:
                          would i still need to the do the voltage corrections when using the voltage divider ? if so, does that need to be reprogrammed every time you replace the battery ?

                          sorry to bring this again @Yveaux @axillent

                          GertSandersG Offline
                          GertSandersG Offline
                          GertSanders
                          Hardware Contributor
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #40

                          @Meshx86
                          No problem to ask. I use the intern measurement method, which uses the internal 1.1V reference of the atmega328, so even if the Vcc value changes from 3.2V -> 2.6V, the reference will always be 1.1V, and the internal method allows you to calculate the actual measured battery voltage based on a difference with the reference, even with a declining value on Vcc (if powered by the same batteries).

                          Meshx86M 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • GertSandersG GertSanders

                            @Meshx86
                            No problem to ask. I use the intern measurement method, which uses the internal 1.1V reference of the atmega328, so even if the Vcc value changes from 3.2V -> 2.6V, the reference will always be 1.1V, and the internal method allows you to calculate the actual measured battery voltage based on a difference with the reference, even with a declining value on Vcc (if powered by the same batteries).

                            Meshx86M Offline
                            Meshx86M Offline
                            Meshx86
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #41

                            @GertSanders sorry mate, am more of a software guy..

                            according to the lib i've seen and @Yveaux's example for the internal method, at the begining you need to define a corrective value :

                            const float VccCorrection = 1.0/1.0;  // Measured Vcc by multimeter divided by reported Vcc
                            
                            Vcc vcc(VccCorrection);
                            

                            is this necessary for an accurate reading ? and is the corrective value need to be just entered once (like a calibration per arduino) or need to be reconfigured every time you replace a battery ?

                            GertSandersG 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Offline
                              N Offline
                              Nicklas Starkel
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #42

                              Good article/site on why Alkaline is the best way to go for Mysensors nodes :)
                              http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/elevating_self_discharge

                              AWIA 1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • Meshx86M Meshx86

                                @GertSanders sorry mate, am more of a software guy..

                                according to the lib i've seen and @Yveaux's example for the internal method, at the begining you need to define a corrective value :

                                const float VccCorrection = 1.0/1.0;  // Measured Vcc by multimeter divided by reported Vcc
                                
                                Vcc vcc(VccCorrection);
                                

                                is this necessary for an accurate reading ? and is the corrective value need to be just entered once (like a calibration per arduino) or need to be reconfigured every time you replace a battery ?

                                GertSandersG Offline
                                GertSandersG Offline
                                GertSanders
                                Hardware Contributor
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #43

                                @Meshx86
                                The corrective value is needed every time you change a battery, AND if you need high accuracy.
                                On my battery based nodes I do not have a need for absolute accuracy, I just need to see the trend of the Vcc value.
                                Changing the battery happens every 12-24 months (depends on the use), so I'm not very interested in absolute accuracy. If you need real accurate measuring, I would suggest a real Analog-To_Digital chip.

                                Meshx86M 1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • GertSandersG GertSanders

                                  @Meshx86
                                  The corrective value is needed every time you change a battery, AND if you need high accuracy.
                                  On my battery based nodes I do not have a need for absolute accuracy, I just need to see the trend of the Vcc value.
                                  Changing the battery happens every 12-24 months (depends on the use), so I'm not very interested in absolute accuracy. If you need real accurate measuring, I would suggest a real Analog-To_Digital chip.

                                  Meshx86M Offline
                                  Meshx86M Offline
                                  Meshx86
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #44

                                  @GertSanders thanks , i think accuracy isn't a deal breaker, i believe everyone's concern is to just know when the batteries need to be replaced (hopefully that can be done without specifying the voltage correction).

                                  YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • Meshx86M Meshx86

                                    @GertSanders thanks , i think accuracy isn't a deal breaker, i believe everyone's concern is to just know when the batteries need to be replaced (hopefully that can be done without specifying the voltage correction).

                                    YveauxY Offline
                                    YveauxY Offline
                                    Yveaux
                                    Mod
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #45

                                    @Meshx86 ok, being quoted so many times I can also add my 5 cents :smile:
                                    The correction factor is optional. You can use it to improve the measured voltage, as the internal voltage reference is only accurate up to so many percentage (have to look up the number). It is unique to the arduino used.
                                    This factor should however not depend on the batteries, possibly on environmental factors (e.g. Temperature)

                                    http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                                    Meshx86M 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • YveauxY Yveaux

                                      @Meshx86 ok, being quoted so many times I can also add my 5 cents :smile:
                                      The correction factor is optional. You can use it to improve the measured voltage, as the internal voltage reference is only accurate up to so many percentage (have to look up the number). It is unique to the arduino used.
                                      This factor should however not depend on the batteries, possibly on environmental factors (e.g. Temperature)

                                      Meshx86M Offline
                                      Meshx86M Offline
                                      Meshx86
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #46

                                      @Yveaux one last, i promise :P

                                      if max battery voltage is actually 3.2v, does that mean that the battery percentage would show 100% for quite sometime before it starts dropping below 3.0v (assuming vmax is set to 3.0) ? or would it increase the inaccuracy gap ?

                                      YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Meshx86M Meshx86

                                        @Yveaux one last, i promise :P

                                        if max battery voltage is actually 3.2v, does that mean that the battery percentage would show 100% for quite sometime before it starts dropping below 3.0v (assuming vmax is set to 3.0) ? or would it increase the inaccuracy gap ?

                                        YveauxY Offline
                                        YveauxY Offline
                                        Yveaux
                                        Mod
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #47

                                        @Meshx86 the function Read_Perc() takes a boolean as 3rd parameter. Default it's true, which means the result is clipped to 0..100% range.
                                        So, if maximum is set to 3v, and you are currently above it, it will report 100% until you drop below 3v.

                                        http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • N Nicklas Starkel

                                          Good article/site on why Alkaline is the best way to go for Mysensors nodes :)
                                          http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/elevating_self_discharge

                                          AWIA Offline
                                          AWIA Offline
                                          AWI
                                          Hero Member
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #48

                                          @Nicklas-Starkel The article mostly talks about rechargeable batteries. I prefer non rechargeable Lithium batteries (like coin cells) for their energy density and very low self discharge.
                                          My major concern with (cheap) alkaline batteries is their leakage of aggressive chemicals. I had to trash my first nodes because of this :unamused:

                                          N tonnerre33T 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          16

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular