Skip to content
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Minimal design thoughts
  • Getting Started
  • Controller
  • Build
  • Hardware
  • Download/API
  • Forum
  • Store

Minimal design thoughts

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
299 Posts 34 Posters 177.4k Views 17 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • axillentA axillent

    @tbowmo said:
    With THAT info, I could have used a smaller pinheader, instead of the 6pin ISP header..

    you cannot remove ISP header because debugWire is activated through ISP )))

    @tbowmo said:

    I'm used to the small components.. And for a couple of handbuild sensor boards, I thought that I might as well cope with them, in order to keep the layout small :) If this is becomming a success, and others would like similair boards, the boards should be assembled with an pick & place machine, and then it doesn't matter that the components are 0402.

    Me and Henrik we have a list of partners for PCB production, If you fine to cooperate more closer with Mysensors we can help you on putting the board unto production. Just let Henrik to know if you have an interest on closer cooperation. I will help with production.

    tbowmoT Offline
    tbowmoT Offline
    tbowmo
    Admin
    wrote on last edited by
    #61

    @axillent said:

    Me and Henrik we have a list of partners for PCB production, If you fine to cooperate more closer with Mysensors we can help you on putting the board unto production. Just let Henrik to know if you have an interest on closer cooperation. I will help with production.

    I know, I have been talking with Henrik about it. Waiting for the first prototypes, so the design can be validated.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tbowmoT tbowmo

      And the latest schematic, and layout (After I scratched the old routing, and started all over, again, for the 5th time I think :))

      Actually I enjoy this fiddling with placing components, and routing tracks.. Only problem is that the wife thinks it takes too much time, and I should do other more usefull stuff, than playing with my computer, making noncense drawings :)

      Schematics
      sensor-alpha4.png

      full layout
      sensor-alpha4-brd.png

      top layer
      sensor-alpha4-brd-TOP.png

      bottom layer
      sensor-alpha4-brd-BOT.png

      Think I am ready to press the GO button for first spin in china.. This is gonna be exciting :)

      blaceyB Offline
      blaceyB Offline
      blacey
      Admin
      wrote on last edited by
      #62

      @tbowmo Nice design exciting to see it come together so well. Good luck with the first board bring-up and I look forward to hearing/seeing the results as the unfold.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tbowmoT Offline
        tbowmoT Offline
        tbowmo
        Admin
        wrote on last edited by tbowmo
        #63

        I have been looking at prices (Using mouser, as they appear to have local european storage, so I can avoid import taxes in Denmark).

        for a temperature / humidity sensor pcb, fully mounted, the price comes up to arround 13$ per unit. The most expensive part is the Si7021, which accounts for 4.5$ per unit (even in larger quantities).

        for BMP180 on board, it's another 4.5$ added.

        The above prices are material only...

        bjornhallbergB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tbowmoT tbowmo

          I have been looking at prices (Using mouser, as they appear to have local european storage, so I can avoid import taxes in Denmark).

          for a temperature / humidity sensor pcb, fully mounted, the price comes up to arround 13$ per unit. The most expensive part is the Si7021, which accounts for 4.5$ per unit (even in larger quantities).

          for BMP180 on board, it's another 4.5$ added.

          The above prices are material only...

          bjornhallbergB Offline
          bjornhallbergB Offline
          bjornhallberg
          Hero Member
          wrote on last edited by
          #64

          @tbowmo Too bad the Si7021 is still too new to show up on AliExpress. The BMP180 is like $1.5 ... ironically the complete soldered module is also $1.5 ... Chinese economy ...

          Component sourcing is the killer of fun things.

          Hmmm. Am I correct to assume then that Mouser has free shipping over €65, and that they add country taxes on top? When I check out I seem to get a 25% VAT charge for instance. Ugh. Still better than paying an extra €10+ to the Swedish Post or UPS or whoever.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tbowmoT Offline
            tbowmoT Offline
            tbowmo
            Admin
            wrote on last edited by
            #65

            @bjornhallberg

            Hmm.. I don't trust aliexpress that much, for example is the BMP180 you get there a counterfeit?

            Take the bmp180, I only need 1 of those, for the whole installation, so I don't mind paying 4-5$ more for a single unit. However, for the rest of the units, all needs the Si7021 (which is pin compatible with HTU21x device, if I remember correctly? However, the specs for the Si7021 is way better)

            I don't know about the taxes from mouser, as I haven't actually bought anything there yet, only set up my project, and added the components needed, so I could get a price indicator on it. But their website says that they pays import duties etc..

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • tbowmoT Offline
              tbowmoT Offline
              tbowmo
              Admin
              wrote on last edited by
              #66

              And the first prototypes have just arrived
              pcb1.jpg

              pcb2.jpg

              Next step is ordering components. so I can get the thing up and running..

              It's going to be a fun christmas :)

              tbowmoT 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • tbowmoT tbowmo

                And the first prototypes have just arrived
                pcb1.jpg

                pcb2.jpg

                Next step is ordering components. so I can get the thing up and running..

                It's going to be a fun christmas :)

                tbowmoT Offline
                tbowmoT Offline
                tbowmo
                Admin
                wrote on last edited by
                #67

                on a side note.. this IS a prototype.. probably only 1 or 2 will be assembled, as version 2 is almost ready to hit the press..

                Next version will have more pins available on pinheaders along each side of the board, and power input to the board is placed a more central place (electrical wise).

                So this prototype will be verification of schematics, and check that radio etc. is wired correctly.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • bjornhallbergB Offline
                  bjornhallbergB Offline
                  bjornhallberg
                  Hero Member
                  wrote on last edited by bjornhallberg
                  #68

                  Great progress!

                  If you still use dirtypcbs (what did you think of their work btw?) and have the ability to pretty much create any sort of routing and tabs, you could look into the upcoming Gerber Panelizer:
                  http://blog.thisisnotrocketscience.nl/projects/pcb-design-tools/
                  Might be more cost effective to order 10x10 pcbs and panelize the hell out of that space. You could fit a ton of different layouts. Tried the tool myself and it saves a ton of time. It can load and rotate gerbers any way you want.

                  Only snag is they haven't released the tool yet. You have to request it from from their twitter account. And it is still beta.

                  tbowmoT 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • bjornhallbergB bjornhallberg

                    Great progress!

                    If you still use dirtypcbs (what did you think of their work btw?) and have the ability to pretty much create any sort of routing and tabs, you could look into the upcoming Gerber Panelizer:
                    http://blog.thisisnotrocketscience.nl/projects/pcb-design-tools/
                    Might be more cost effective to order 10x10 pcbs and panelize the hell out of that space. You could fit a ton of different layouts. Tried the tool myself and it saves a ton of time. It can load and rotate gerbers any way you want.

                    Only snag is they haven't released the tool yet. You have to request it from from their twitter account. And it is still beta.

                    tbowmoT Offline
                    tbowmoT Offline
                    tbowmo
                    Admin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #69

                    @bjornhallberg said:

                    Great progress!

                    If you still use dirtypcbs (what did you think of their work btw?) and have the ability to pretty much create any sort of routing and tabs, you could look into the upcoming Gerber Panelizer:
                    http://blog.thisisnotrocketscience.nl/projects/pcb-design-tools/
                    Might be more cost effective to order 10x10 pcbs and panelize the hell out of that space. You could fit a ton of different layouts. Tried the tool myself and it saves a ton of time. It can load and rotate gerbers any way you want.

                    Only snag is they haven't released the tool yet. You have to request it from from their twitter account. And it is still beta.

                    Seems like dirty pcb is doing a great job, compared to the price, only have experience with prinline.dk from previous jobs, but they are expensive like hell (just looked at their prices earlier today, together with Hek, They want 314$ (plus taxes) for the same job, that I pay 14$ for at dirtypcb, only advantage is that they have a turn arround time of 8 days, instead of 4-5 weeks from dirtypcbs.

                    It like a nice tool, Have to look at it :) Only problem is, that I have to generate gerbers myself then, instead of just uploading the eagle file, which dirtypcb turns into gerber files for me. (Remember a project 10 years ago, where it was a lot of work in creating gerbers in eagle).

                    bjornhallbergB 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tbowmoT tbowmo

                      @bjornhallberg said:

                      Great progress!

                      If you still use dirtypcbs (what did you think of their work btw?) and have the ability to pretty much create any sort of routing and tabs, you could look into the upcoming Gerber Panelizer:
                      http://blog.thisisnotrocketscience.nl/projects/pcb-design-tools/
                      Might be more cost effective to order 10x10 pcbs and panelize the hell out of that space. You could fit a ton of different layouts. Tried the tool myself and it saves a ton of time. It can load and rotate gerbers any way you want.

                      Only snag is they haven't released the tool yet. You have to request it from from their twitter account. And it is still beta.

                      Seems like dirty pcb is doing a great job, compared to the price, only have experience with prinline.dk from previous jobs, but they are expensive like hell (just looked at their prices earlier today, together with Hek, They want 314$ (plus taxes) for the same job, that I pay 14$ for at dirtypcb, only advantage is that they have a turn arround time of 8 days, instead of 4-5 weeks from dirtypcbs.

                      It like a nice tool, Have to look at it :) Only problem is, that I have to generate gerbers myself then, instead of just uploading the eagle file, which dirtypcb turns into gerber files for me. (Remember a project 10 years ago, where it was a lot of work in creating gerbers in eagle).

                      bjornhallbergB Offline
                      bjornhallbergB Offline
                      bjornhallberg
                      Hero Member
                      wrote on last edited by bjornhallberg
                      #70

                      @tbowmo said:

                      Seems like dirty pcb is doing a great job, compared to the price, only have experience with prinline.dk from previous jobs, but they are expensive like hell (just looked at their prices earlier today, together with Hek, They want 314$ (plus taxes) for the same job, that I pay 14$ for at dirtypcb, only advantage is that they have a turn arround time of 8 days, instead of 4-5 weeks from dirtypcbs.

                      Ouch, that seems a bit steep. Never heard of any cheap board houses outside of China. OSHPark may be the exception? I thinks they have fabrication in the US right? I heard they were planning to set up a factory in Europe ... don't know if anything ever happened.

                      It like a nice tool, Have to look at it :) Only problem is, that I have to generate gerbers myself then, instead of just uploading the eagle file, which dirtypcb turns into gerber files for me. (Remember a project 10 years ago, where it was a lot of work in creating gerbers in eagle).

                      I don't know how CAM exports have changed over the years but compared to how backwards everything else works in Eagle, exporting Gerbers is easy. DirtyPCBs have a CAM-file listed on their about page. I sent them Gerbers of Meanpenguin's PCB designs and that seemed to have worked out. Knock on wood. Hopefully I'll have the boards back before xmas. The reason I didn't send the Eagle file was their new warning on the front page regarding Eagle v7+ files. Some unspecified problem with their Eagle 6.x installation. Only iffy thing I've run into so far (on some exports) is the drill file showing the holes all over the place because of the wrong precision settings. Now I'm sure the board house would have fixed this for me (their Gerber tools are bound to a great deal more advanced than mine and can probably detect Excellon formats automatically), but choosing EXCELLON_24 as output solved that problem. It's enough to send them impossible routing and endless stop mask errors ;-)

                      Oh and btw, that Gerber Panelizer also helps to circumvent the 5x5cm limit on freeware Eagle since you can take your Gerbers and join them any way you please as a greater whole. Just to point out the obvious.

                      tbowmoT 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • bjornhallbergB bjornhallberg

                        @tbowmo said:

                        Seems like dirty pcb is doing a great job, compared to the price, only have experience with prinline.dk from previous jobs, but they are expensive like hell (just looked at their prices earlier today, together with Hek, They want 314$ (plus taxes) for the same job, that I pay 14$ for at dirtypcb, only advantage is that they have a turn arround time of 8 days, instead of 4-5 weeks from dirtypcbs.

                        Ouch, that seems a bit steep. Never heard of any cheap board houses outside of China. OSHPark may be the exception? I thinks they have fabrication in the US right? I heard they were planning to set up a factory in Europe ... don't know if anything ever happened.

                        It like a nice tool, Have to look at it :) Only problem is, that I have to generate gerbers myself then, instead of just uploading the eagle file, which dirtypcb turns into gerber files for me. (Remember a project 10 years ago, where it was a lot of work in creating gerbers in eagle).

                        I don't know how CAM exports have changed over the years but compared to how backwards everything else works in Eagle, exporting Gerbers is easy. DirtyPCBs have a CAM-file listed on their about page. I sent them Gerbers of Meanpenguin's PCB designs and that seemed to have worked out. Knock on wood. Hopefully I'll have the boards back before xmas. The reason I didn't send the Eagle file was their new warning on the front page regarding Eagle v7+ files. Some unspecified problem with their Eagle 6.x installation. Only iffy thing I've run into so far (on some exports) is the drill file showing the holes all over the place because of the wrong precision settings. Now I'm sure the board house would have fixed this for me (their Gerber tools are bound to a great deal more advanced than mine and can probably detect Excellon formats automatically), but choosing EXCELLON_24 as output solved that problem. It's enough to send them impossible routing and endless stop mask errors ;-)

                        Oh and btw, that Gerber Panelizer also helps to circumvent the 5x5cm limit on freeware Eagle since you can take your Gerbers and join them any way you please as a greater whole. Just to point out the obvious.

                        tbowmoT Offline
                        tbowmoT Offline
                        tbowmo
                        Admin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #71

                        @bjornhallberg said:

                        I don't know how CAM exports have changed over the years but compared to how backwards everything else works in Eagle, exporting Gerbers is easy. DirtyPCBs have a CAM-file listed on their about page. I sent them Gerbers of Meanpenguin's PCB designs and that seemed to have worked out. Knock on wood. Hopefully I'll have the boards back before xmas. The reason I didn't send the Eagle file was their new warning on the front page regarding Eagle v7+ files. Some unspecified problem with their Eagle 6.x installation. Only iffy thing I've run into so far (on some exports) is the drill file showing the holes all over the place because of the wrong precision settings. Now I'm sure the board house would have fixed this for me (their Gerber tools are bound to a great deal more advanced than mine and can probably detect Excellon formats automatically), but choosing EXCELLON_24 as output solved that problem. It's enough to send them impossible routing and endless stop mask errors ;-)

                        Hhm.. don't tell my boards that dirtypcbs have problems with eagle v7 files :) Haven't seen that warning before now.. So cross my fingers, that everything is ok.

                        I remember the trouble with excellon format, and getting drill files alligned, but got some files made for printline back then, and they are still making the pcb, so must have done something right :)

                        Oh and btw, that Gerber Panelizer also helps to circumvent the 5x5cm limit on freeware Eagle since you can take your Gerbers and join them any way you please as a greater whole. Just to point out the obvious.

                        Think that the free eagle is 10x8cm board space, isn't it?

                        bjornhallbergB 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • tbowmoT tbowmo

                          @bjornhallberg said:

                          I don't know how CAM exports have changed over the years but compared to how backwards everything else works in Eagle, exporting Gerbers is easy. DirtyPCBs have a CAM-file listed on their about page. I sent them Gerbers of Meanpenguin's PCB designs and that seemed to have worked out. Knock on wood. Hopefully I'll have the boards back before xmas. The reason I didn't send the Eagle file was their new warning on the front page regarding Eagle v7+ files. Some unspecified problem with their Eagle 6.x installation. Only iffy thing I've run into so far (on some exports) is the drill file showing the holes all over the place because of the wrong precision settings. Now I'm sure the board house would have fixed this for me (their Gerber tools are bound to a great deal more advanced than mine and can probably detect Excellon formats automatically), but choosing EXCELLON_24 as output solved that problem. It's enough to send them impossible routing and endless stop mask errors ;-)

                          Hhm.. don't tell my boards that dirtypcbs have problems with eagle v7 files :) Haven't seen that warning before now.. So cross my fingers, that everything is ok.

                          I remember the trouble with excellon format, and getting drill files alligned, but got some files made for printline back then, and they are still making the pcb, so must have done something right :)

                          Oh and btw, that Gerber Panelizer also helps to circumvent the 5x5cm limit on freeware Eagle since you can take your Gerbers and join them any way you please as a greater whole. Just to point out the obvious.

                          Think that the free eagle is 10x8cm board space, isn't it?

                          bjornhallbergB Offline
                          bjornhallbergB Offline
                          bjornhallberg
                          Hero Member
                          wrote on last edited by bjornhallberg
                          #72

                          @tbowmo Yes you're right, the Eagle board size is 10x8! Don't know where I got the 5x5 from. Nevertheless, since DirtyPCBs can do pretty mindblowing routing at no extra cost and have a pretty good price on 10x10 also ... you could probably save a great deal by doing what the Not Rocket Science guys did and create a heavily panelized board that covers a handful of different PCBs.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • RJ_MakeR Offline
                            RJ_MakeR Offline
                            RJ_Make
                            Hero Member
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #73

                            It will be interesting to see if that radio causes any interference for the MCU. Looks like it will be right over the MCU.?

                            RJ_Make

                            tbowmoT 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • RJ_MakeR RJ_Make

                              It will be interesting to see if that radio causes any interference for the MCU. Looks like it will be right over the MCU.?

                              tbowmoT Offline
                              tbowmoT Offline
                              tbowmo
                              Admin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #74

                              @ServiceXp said:

                              It will be interesting to see if that radio causes any interference for the MCU. Looks like it will be right over the MCU.?

                              the antenna is not above the mcu, and the nrf module is using the entire backside as gnd. So should be shielded.. Also, I am kind of more worried about mcu generating noise for the radio..

                              Specially for the first prototype, where I was a bit daft at placing powersupply pins on the wrong side of the pcb, as far away as possible, from the radio. And letting it run under the CPU to pick up noise from that.. Version 2 has this fixed, where I have the power input pins moved closer to the radio, and using wider tracks for VCC arround the board. (Should have done more reviews on the first design before sending it off to dirtypcbs)

                              RJ_MakeR 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • tbowmoT tbowmo

                                @ServiceXp said:

                                It will be interesting to see if that radio causes any interference for the MCU. Looks like it will be right over the MCU.?

                                the antenna is not above the mcu, and the nrf module is using the entire backside as gnd. So should be shielded.. Also, I am kind of more worried about mcu generating noise for the radio..

                                Specially for the first prototype, where I was a bit daft at placing powersupply pins on the wrong side of the pcb, as far away as possible, from the radio. And letting it run under the CPU to pick up noise from that.. Version 2 has this fixed, where I have the power input pins moved closer to the radio, and using wider tracks for VCC arround the board. (Should have done more reviews on the first design before sending it off to dirtypcbs)

                                RJ_MakeR Offline
                                RJ_MakeR Offline
                                RJ_Make
                                Hero Member
                                wrote on last edited by RJ_Make
                                #75

                                @tbowmo Ah.. I didn't even think about the MCU causing interference for the radio. @Bandra's design suffers from this close proximity interference, which causes, I think, the MCU to lockup. I had to move the radio module from over top the Arduino for stability.

                                RJ_Make

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • tbowmoT Offline
                                  tbowmoT Offline
                                  tbowmo
                                  Admin
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #76

                                  @ServiceXp

                                  On one of my first mockups, I removed the connector on the radio and used some double sided tape to stick it to the back of an arduino micro, and then soldering wires between the boards. Works like a charm on battery. Antenna is just hanging off the edge of the arduino on the end opposite the serial port pins.

                                  Using it as a range tester for mysensors, logging into a raspberry pi with my mobile using ssh, and then running a serial port terminal emulator on the raspberry to connect to the serial GW. Then I can walk arround with the battery powered node, and check if the GW receives the data packages on my phone :)

                                  Haven't looked at @Bandra's design, but how close is the nrf antenna to the mcu?

                                  RJ_MakeR 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • tbowmoT tbowmo

                                    @ServiceXp

                                    On one of my first mockups, I removed the connector on the radio and used some double sided tape to stick it to the back of an arduino micro, and then soldering wires between the boards. Works like a charm on battery. Antenna is just hanging off the edge of the arduino on the end opposite the serial port pins.

                                    Using it as a range tester for mysensors, logging into a raspberry pi with my mobile using ssh, and then running a serial port terminal emulator on the raspberry to connect to the serial GW. Then I can walk arround with the battery powered node, and check if the GW receives the data packages on my phone :)

                                    Haven't looked at @Bandra's design, but how close is the nrf antenna to the mcu?

                                    RJ_MakeR Offline
                                    RJ_MakeR Offline
                                    RJ_Make
                                    Hero Member
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #77

                                    @tbowmo
                                    This close.

                                    This close

                                    RJ_Make

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • tbowmoT Offline
                                      tbowmoT Offline
                                      tbowmo
                                      Admin
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #78

                                      This is my node, with radio close to the mcu, this works really good. So I would expect that it also works for the small module that I have made.

                                      20141211_073618~2.jpg

                                      20141211_073604~2.jpg

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • tbowmoT Offline
                                        tbowmoT Offline
                                        tbowmo
                                        Admin
                                        wrote on last edited by tbowmo
                                        #79

                                        just ordered components for the first 10 boards. Just about 190$. My wife looked funny at me, as she saw the amount (she was sitting next to me when i ordered).

                                        Well birthay present for myself :)

                                        bjornhallbergB 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • tbowmoT tbowmo

                                          just ordered components for the first 10 boards. Just about 190$. My wife looked funny at me, as she saw the amount (she was sitting next to me when i ordered).

                                          Well birthay present for myself :)

                                          bjornhallbergB Offline
                                          bjornhallbergB Offline
                                          bjornhallberg
                                          Hero Member
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #80

                                          @tbowmo That was a tad more expensive than you expected I guess? Did Mouser add taxes etc at checkout?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          2

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular