Where to find a sketch with temperature read?

I see in logs, that the whole process of signing and communicating to the node takes a bit more than one second. I do not know how to make a stress test properly, so I hoped that somebody else did it my question is if gateway will handle load by putting messages in some pipeline, or I should try to make sure that messages are fired with some spaces.

Are there performance limitations to be considered for mysensors and SensebenderGW specifically. Will the gateway handle the load of signed communications if rules will be firing messages to different sensors like 1-2-5-10 per second?

@Anticimex yes, when I delete #include atsha driver line, it compiles well. thanks.

When I try to compile SensebenderGW sketch with signing features, I receive a bunch of errors. What am I missing?

Arduino: 1.8.5 (Windows Store 1.8.10.0) (Windows 10), Board: "Sensebender Gateway"

In file included from C:\Users\rzylius\AppData\Local\Temp\arduino_modified_sketch_737033\SensebenderGatewaySerial.ino:88:0:

C:\Users\rzylius\Documents\Arduino\libraries\MySensors/drivers/ATSHA204/ATSHA204.cpp:6:16: error: redefinition of 'uint8_t device_pin'

static uint8_t device_pin;

            ^

In file included from C:\Users\rzylius\Documents\Arduino\libraries\MySensors/MySensors.h:131:0,

             from C:\Users\rzylius\AppData\Local\Temp\arduino_modified_sketch_737033\SensebenderGatewaySerial.ino:86:

C:\Users\rzylius\Documents\Arduino\libraries\MySensors/drivers/ATSHA204/ATSHA204.cpp:6:16: error: 'uint8_t device_pin' previously declared here

static uint8_t device_pin;

            ^

In file included from C:\Users\rzylius\AppData\Local\Temp\arduino_modified_sketch_737033\SensebenderGatewaySerial.ino:88:0:

C:\Users\rzylius\Documents\Arduino\libraries\MySensors/drivers/ATSHA204/ATSHA204.cpp: In function 'void swi_set_signal_pin(uint8_t)':

C:\Users\rzylius\Documents\Arduino\libraries\MySensors/drivers/ATSHA204/ATSHA204.cpp:24:13: error: redefinition of 'void swi_set_signal_pin(uint8_t)'

static void swi_set_signal_pin(uint8_t is_high)

         ^

In file included from C:\Users\rzylius\Documents\Arduino\libraries\MySensors/MySensors.h:131:0,

             from C:\Users\rzylius\AppData\Local\Temp\arduino_modified_sketch_737033\SensebenderGatewaySerial.ino:86:

C:\Users\rzylius\Documents\Arduino\libraries\MySensors/drivers/ATSHA204/ATSHA204.cpp:24:13: error: 'void swi_set_signal_pin(uint8_t)' previously defined here

static void swi_set_signal_pin(uint8_t is_high)

         ^

and the same type of errors reoccurs multiple times.

@mfalkvidd , yes, I see. As I wrote in the first post I was using https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/tree/development/examples/SecurityPersonalizer code.

I checked with the Personizer code in the Library examples - it does compile, thanks.

What I find a bit confusing - in the sketch in exampla library you have to make two keys - USER_SOFT_KEY and USER_KEY (when you do not use hw hashing, and when you do).

I have mixed configurations. Should those keys be the same in my network for mixed configuration to work?

thanks for help and sorry for confusion

@mfalkvidd I tested now on my windows machine with fresh install of arduino185. Mysenors library 2.1.1 , mysensors SAMD boards.

the same outcome

Arduino: 1.8.5 (Windows Store 1.8.10.0) (Windows 10), Board: "Sensebender Gateway"

Build options changed, rebuilding all
C:\Users\rzylius\Documents\Arduino\SecurityPersonalizer\SecurityPersonalizer.ino: In function 'void write_eeprom_checksum()':

SecurityPersonalizer:697: error: 'EEPROM_PERSONALIZATION_CHECKSUM_ADDRESS' was not declared in this scope

  hwWriteConfigBlock((void*)&hash[0], (void*)EEPROM_PERSONALIZATION_CHECKSUM_ADDRESS, 1);

                                             ^

C:\Users\rzylius\Documents\Arduino\SecurityPersonalizer\SecurityPersonalizer.ino: In function 'void probe_and_print_peripherals()':

SecurityPersonalizer:1327: error: 'unique_id_t' was not declared in this scope

  unique_id_t uniqueID;

  ^

SecurityPersonalizer:1327: error: expected ';' before 'uniqueID'

  unique_id_t uniqueID;

              ^

SecurityPersonalizer:1352: error: 'uniqueID' was not declared in this scope

  if (hwUniqueID(&uniqueID)) {

                  ^

SecurityPersonalizer:1352: error: 'hwUniqueID' was not declared in this scope

  if (hwUniqueID(&uniqueID)) {

                          ^

exit status 1
'EEPROM_PERSONALIZATION_CHECKSUM_ADDRESS' was not declared in this scope

This report would have more information with
"Show verbose output during compilation"
option enabled in File -> Preferences.

hi,

I am having trouble to compile security personalizer sketch for Sensebender GW
https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/tree/development/examples/SecurityPersonalizer

I receive error log. any advise?

regards, rimantas

Arduino: 1.8.5 (Linux), Board: "Sensebender Gateway"

/root/Arduino/SecurityPersonalizer_v11/SecurityPersonalizer_v11.ino: In function 'void write_eeprom_checksum()':
SecurityPersonalizer_v11:697: error: 'EEPROM_PERSONALIZATION_CHECKSUM_ADDRESS' was not declared in this scope
  hwWriteConfigBlock((void*)&hash[0], (void*)EEPROM_PERSONALIZATION_CHECKSUM_ADDRESS, 1);
                                             ^
/root/Arduino/SecurityPersonalizer_v11/SecurityPersonalizer_v11.ino: In function 'void probe_and_print_peripherals()':
SecurityPersonalizer_v11:1327: error: 'unique_id_t' was not declared in this scope
  unique_id_t uniqueID;
  ^
SecurityPersonalizer_v11:1327: error: expected ';' before 'uniqueID'
  unique_id_t uniqueID;
              ^
SecurityPersonalizer_v11:1352: error: 'uniqueID' was not declared in this scope
  if (hwUniqueID(&uniqueID)) {
                  ^
SecurityPersonalizer_v11:1352: error: 'hwUniqueID' was not declared in this scope
  if (hwUniqueID(&uniqueID)) {
                          ^
exit status 1
'EEPROM_PERSONALIZATION_CHECKSUM_ADDRESS' was not declared in this scope

This report would have more information with
"Show verbose output during compilation"
option enabled in File -> Preferences.

The problem dissapeared when I changed 4.7uf capacitator to 47uf. works great!

Hi,

it is very cool project. I assembled one but when I test it this is what I get:

16:18:39.980 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,101-101-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
16:18:39.981 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:BC
16:18:39.982 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:FPAR REQ,ID=101
16:18:39.985 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;TSF:PNG:SEND,TO=0
16:18:39.988 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;TSF:CKU:OK
16:18:39.993 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:GWL OK
16:18:40.963 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;Will not sign message for destination 101 as it does not require it
16:18:41.004 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-101-101,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=NACK:0
16:18:41.010 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,12-12-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
16:18:41.013 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:PINGED,ID=12,HP=1
16:18:41.018 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;Skipping security for command 3 type 25
16:18:41.029 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-12-12,s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
16:18:44.038 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,101-101-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
16:18:44.039 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:BC
16:18:44.040 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:FPAR REQ,ID=101
16:18:44.041 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;TSF:CKU:OK,FCTRL
16:18:44.044 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:GWL OK
16:18:44.974 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;Will not sign message for destination 101 as it does not require it
16:18:45.016 [DEBUG] [orsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-101-101,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=NACK:0

I guess it shows that radio has unreliable power. Please advise how should I debug?

regards