Skip to content
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. [SOLVED] High battery usage (Pro-Mini / RFM69 / Si7021)
  • Getting Started
  • Controller
  • Build
  • Hardware
  • Download/API
  • Forum
  • Store

[SOLVED] High battery usage (Pro-Mini / RFM69 / Si7021)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
pro minirfm69si7021battery poweredbattery
16 Posts 6 Posters 145 Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • skywatchS Offline
    skywatchS Offline
    skywatch
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Your sleep interval is set for 1 minute but the comment says 10 minutes.

    If you want 10 minutes between sends then you have to change the sleep_interval from 60000 to 600000. (note the extra '0').

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • OumuamuaO Offline
      OumuamuaO Offline
      Oumuamua
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      Hi,

      Thanks for all replies.

      @skywatch : thanks! I was running a test with a 1 min loop but didn't change the description.

      @Yveaux : have you been able to run up to 63% without the booster? my sensor stops working when the battery is at 2.8v (2x AA)

      @eiten : this might be the latest issue I'm having. Even with my limited current measurement, the step-up is actually using a crazy 11mA (not uA) when idle. Same current as when not connected with the board.

      Will investigate further and post back.

      Thanks all,

      YveauxY E 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • OumuamuaO Offline
        OumuamuaO Offline
        Oumuamua
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Guys, quick update:

        Seems the step-up had a problem. Changed to a new one does not use that much current.

        E 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • OumuamuaO Oumuamua

          Hi,

          Thanks for all replies.

          @skywatch : thanks! I was running a test with a 1 min loop but didn't change the description.

          @Yveaux : have you been able to run up to 63% without the booster? my sensor stops working when the battery is at 2.8v (2x AA)

          @eiten : this might be the latest issue I'm having. Even with my limited current measurement, the step-up is actually using a crazy 11mA (not uA) when idle. Same current as when not connected with the board.

          Will investigate further and post back.

          Thanks all,

          YveauxY Offline
          YveauxY Offline
          Yveaux
          Mod
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          @Oumuamua said in High battery usage (Pro-Mini / RFM69 / Si7021):

          have you been able to run up to 63% without the booster

          Yes, just 2xAA, directly powering pro mini 8mhz & nrf24
          What brown out level is set in the the atmega fuses? Mine are set to 1.8v (and yes, I realize I'm overclocking the atmega when batteries are low...)

          http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • OumuamuaO Oumuamua

            Hi,

            Thanks for all replies.

            @skywatch : thanks! I was running a test with a 1 min loop but didn't change the description.

            @Yveaux : have you been able to run up to 63% without the booster? my sensor stops working when the battery is at 2.8v (2x AA)

            @eiten : this might be the latest issue I'm having. Even with my limited current measurement, the step-up is actually using a crazy 11mA (not uA) when idle. Same current as when not connected with the board.

            Will investigate further and post back.

            Thanks all,

            E Offline
            E Offline
            eiten
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            @Oumuamua said in High battery usage (Pro-Mini / RFM69 / Si7021):

            the step-up is actually using a crazy 11mA (not uA) when idle. Same current as when not connected with the board.

            That is not normal! Do you have a second step up? It seems to be... not normal :face_with_rolling_eyes:

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • OumuamuaO Oumuamua

              Guys, quick update:

              Seems the step-up had a problem. Changed to a new one does not use that much current.

              E Offline
              E Offline
              eiten
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              @Oumuamua said in High battery usage (Pro-Mini / RFM69 / Si7021):

              Seems the step-up had a problem. Changed to a new one does not use that much current.

              Oh... Sorry. I should read all the new messages befor posting again....

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • OumuamuaO Offline
                OumuamuaO Offline
                Oumuamua
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                Hi all,

                Thanks for all the help.

                After some testing and letting the node run for some days, it seems that the issue is partially solved: battery consumption is very low when the node is idle.

                However, the battery consumption seems to reach full runtime levels when something happens with the gateway. My follow-up question is:

                What exactly happens happens when the node sends a message to a gateways that is either unreachable or cannot pass the message on (to a MQTT server, for example)? Shouldn't the node try a couple of times and then move on to sleep as per the code?

                I have been working on my home network and had to disconnect / reboot the router, gateway, etc.

                Every time it happens, two situations occurred:

                • gateway didn't report updates to the MQTT server (probably an issue with the gateway as the sensors are meters away and have -25 to -40 RSSI levels, I reseted the gateway in those few circumstances)

                • message reaches the gateway and MQTT server, but the controller didn't record it (Openhab), in which case I rebooted the controller

                Many thanks again,

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • OumuamuaO Offline
                  OumuamuaO Offline
                  Oumuamua
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Guys,

                  Just quick update to help others that may find this topic relevant: problem is solved. Problem was the step-up (probably low quality). Sensor is working well and with very low battery usage (no change in 5 days).

                  Thanks for the comments.

                  mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • OumuamuaO Oumuamua

                    Guys,

                    Just quick update to help others that may find this topic relevant: problem is solved. Problem was the step-up (probably low quality). Sensor is working well and with very low battery usage (no change in 5 days).

                    Thanks for the comments.

                    mfalkviddM Offline
                    mfalkviddM Offline
                    mfalkvidd
                    Mod
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    nice work @Oumuamua, thanks for reporting back.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • NeverDieN Offline
                      NeverDieN Offline
                      NeverDie
                      Hero Member
                      wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                      #16

                      The product listing for the step-up that the OP is using says:

                      Sucks the juice out of your batteries.

                      Sounds like it delivers on what it promises.... :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing:

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      7

                      Online

                      11.7k

                      Users

                      11.2k

                      Topics

                      113.0k

                      Posts


                      Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • OpenHardware.io
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular