Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. OpenHardware.io
  3. 💬 LinuxIoT Project

💬 LinuxIoT Project

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenHardware.io
iot
20 Posts 7 Posters 3.6k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • scalzS Offline
    scalzS Offline
    scalz
    Hardware Contributor
    wrote on last edited by scalz
    #10

    @LinuxIoT
    thx for precision, interesting to know for gcc, i'm not big fan of online solution though ;)
    I'm also not suprised for the board cost, no problem, i was just curious to know your strategy.
    That said this is cool to share your work. Maybe i'll try one day :)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • LinuxIoTL LinuxIoT

      @scalz We develop with GNU tools and that is what we provide. Lots of IoT operating systems can run on our board, to name a few Zephyr, RIOTOS, ARM mbed, etc. The programming depends on which of these OS you use i.e. ARM mbed can be programmed using their online IDE and as well as GCC toolchain.

      Cost per unit of EP Board isn't cheap as the board is meant for production use and it has features many COTS boards do not have - refer to project site for details. Design can be modified to reduce the cost. We are not selling the board at this point as we are yet to arrange funding for the project, fabrication costs good amount of money, once we have that the next step is to stock a few and sell. Thanks.

      YveauxY Offline
      YveauxY Offline
      Yveaux
      Mod
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      @LinuxIoT why do you call your board 'LinuxIot' when you don't seem to target Linux as OS?
      Or am I missing something?

      http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

      LinuxIoTL 1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • YveauxY Yveaux

        @LinuxIoT why do you call your board 'LinuxIot' when you don't seem to target Linux as OS?
        Or am I missing something?

        LinuxIoTL Offline
        LinuxIoTL Offline
        LinuxIoT
        wrote on last edited by LinuxIoT
        #12

        @Yveaux The name of Project comes from our product Roadmap which is not yet released for public - excerpt:

        • QEMU bsp for Linux including PHY/Network layer emulation and few Digital I/Os and Analog
        • SDK for Linux (based on GNU Tools and VIM plugins etc)
        • Deployment planner application
        • Gateway on Linux (board design provided is for CHIP at the moment but we will be working on a ARM Cortex board with RF MCU as PHY)
        • Tighter Integration with Linux for Dev, Ops, Deployments

        IoT end-nodes can run a variety of embedded firmware/OS i.e. Zephyr, RIOTOS, ARM mbed, etc. Although, we are actively evaluating work-needed for using Linux on 32bit Cortex M MCUs.

        AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • LinuxIoTL LinuxIoT

          @Yveaux The name of Project comes from our product Roadmap which is not yet released for public - excerpt:

          • QEMU bsp for Linux including PHY/Network layer emulation and few Digital I/Os and Analog
          • SDK for Linux (based on GNU Tools and VIM plugins etc)
          • Deployment planner application
          • Gateway on Linux (board design provided is for CHIP at the moment but we will be working on a ARM Cortex board with RF MCU as PHY)
          • Tighter Integration with Linux for Dev, Ops, Deployments

          IoT end-nodes can run a variety of embedded firmware/OS i.e. Zephyr, RIOTOS, ARM mbed, etc. Although, we are actively evaluating work-needed for using Linux on 32bit Cortex M MCUs.

          AnticimexA Offline
          AnticimexA Offline
          Anticimex
          Contest Winner
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          @LinuxIoT does this relate to mysensors in any way?

          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

          LinuxIoTL 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • AnticimexA Anticimex

            @LinuxIoT does this relate to mysensors in any way?

            LinuxIoTL Offline
            LinuxIoTL Offline
            LinuxIoT
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            @Anticimex Please clarify your question, thanks

            AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • LinuxIoTL LinuxIoT

              @Anticimex Please clarify your question, thanks

              AnticimexA Offline
              AnticimexA Offline
              Anticimex
              Contest Winner
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              @LinuxIoT well, this is the forum for MySensors. You can read about MySensors on mysensors.org. Everything discussed here is relating to the MySensors infrastructure. And most if not all projects on openhardware.io is targeting the MySensors framework. But I fail to see these your board has anything to do with mysensors.

              Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

              LinuxIoTL 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • AnticimexA Anticimex

                @LinuxIoT well, this is the forum for MySensors. You can read about MySensors on mysensors.org. Everything discussed here is relating to the MySensors infrastructure. And most if not all projects on openhardware.io is targeting the MySensors framework. But I fail to see these your board has anything to do with mysensors.

                LinuxIoTL Offline
                LinuxIoTL Offline
                LinuxIoT
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                @Anticimex openhardware.io shares this forum for comments, you are correct in saying we do not use mysensors infrastructure. If there is a way to separate comments/forum from both sites let us know and we will make the change.

                gohanG AnticimexA 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • LinuxIoTL LinuxIoT

                  @Anticimex openhardware.io shares this forum for comments, you are correct in saying we do not use mysensors infrastructure. If there is a way to separate comments/forum from both sites let us know and we will make the change.

                  gohanG Offline
                  gohanG Offline
                  gohan
                  Mod
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  @LinuxIoT or you could add support to mysensors and everyone is happy 😁

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • LinuxIoTL LinuxIoT

                    @Anticimex openhardware.io shares this forum for comments, you are correct in saying we do not use mysensors infrastructure. If there is a way to separate comments/forum from both sites let us know and we will make the change.

                    AnticimexA Offline
                    AnticimexA Offline
                    Anticimex
                    Contest Winner
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    @LinuxIoT not to my knowledge but perhaps you could emphasize that fact in your openhardware.io topic. Users might otherwise be confused in how to incorporate your device into their system.

                    Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • hekH Offline
                      hekH Offline
                      hek
                      Admin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      This is a openhardware.io comment thread, so it does not necessarily have to be MySensors related.

                      Could be a bit confusing when the project also is IoT-related but not much we can do about it at the moment.

                      LinuxIoTL 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • hekH hek

                        This is a openhardware.io comment thread, so it does not necessarily have to be MySensors related.

                        Could be a bit confusing when the project also is IoT-related but not much we can do about it at the moment.

                        LinuxIoTL Offline
                        LinuxIoTL Offline
                        LinuxIoT
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        @hek thanks for the clarification, appreciate that.

                        @Anticimex hope this clarifies.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        13

                        Online

                        11.7k

                        Users

                        11.2k

                        Topics

                        113.1k

                        Posts


                        Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • MySensors
                        • OpenHardware.io
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular