MySensors 2.0.0 Released
-
I've read the documentation and I'm really impressed with the great work you've guys have done. Developping sensors with MySensors had never been this easy. You guys rock!
-
Congratulations!
I used 2.0dev last month and I'm happy to see this version get stable status. :thumbsup: -
-
I did now also update my gateway but I see two messages in the debug panel that I don't understand:
pm open,type:2 0 0;255;3;0;9;TSP:SANCHK:OKDoes anybody have an idea what that means?
@gloob said:
I did now also update my gateway but I see two messages in the debug panel that I don't understand:
pm open,type:2 0 0;255;3;0;9;TSP:SANCHK:OKDoes anybody have an idea what that means?
I have this problem too. What does that mean?
-
@gloob said:
I did now also update my gateway but I see two messages in the debug panel that I don't understand:
pm open,type:2 0 0;255;3;0;9;TSP:SANCHK:OKDoes anybody have an idea what that means?
I have this problem too. What does that mean?
@kenci said:
@gloob said:
I did now also update my gateway but I see two messages in the debug panel that I don't understand:
pm open,type:2 0 0;255;3;0;9;TSP:SANCHK:OKDoes anybody have an idea what that means?
I have this problem too. What does that mean?
The TSP:SANCHK:OK is a sanity check of the radio, this time it's OK. But if we fail in talking with the radio (spi failure etc) it will try to initialize the radio, and also write Fail (I believe)
It's @tekka that is the brain behind this part (and has promised to make some documentation on it :))
-
@kenci said:
@gloob said:
I did now also update my gateway but I see two messages in the debug panel that I don't understand:
pm open,type:2 0 0;255;3;0;9;TSP:SANCHK:OKDoes anybody have an idea what that means?
I have this problem too. What does that mean?
The TSP:SANCHK:OK is a sanity check of the radio, this time it's OK. But if we fail in talking with the radio (spi failure etc) it will try to initialize the radio, and also write Fail (I believe)
It's @tekka that is the brain behind this part (and has promised to make some documentation on it :))
@tbowmo Thank you for the explanation. But what does that mean
pm open,type:2 0 -
Hi there.
Good work.
I was using dev ver. - should I recompile all nodes and GW to 2.0.0, to use it? -
Hi there.
Good work.
I was using dev ver. - should I recompile all nodes and GW to 2.0.0, to use it? -
Is there any plans to update the Raspberry gateway? The one where the nrf radio is connected directly to RPI gpio.
As far as i know it is version 1.4 at the moment. -
Is there any plans to update the Raspberry gateway? The one where the nrf radio is connected directly to RPI gpio.
As far as i know it is version 1.4 at the moment.I think that was someone who contributed it a while back. I remember going though the thread, and at one time someone was looking for anyone to update the 1.5 base for the signing; IIRC.
Probably best to switch to another Gateway for now.
-
I think that was someone who contributed it a while back. I remember going though the thread, and at one time someone was looking for anyone to update the 1.5 base for the signing; IIRC.
Probably best to switch to another Gateway for now.
@drock1985
Is there any pro/cons when choosing the esp gateway or the serial gateway (connected to Raspberry pi)? -
@drock1985
Is there any pro/cons when choosing the esp gateway or the serial gateway (connected to Raspberry pi)?Not really; depends on what your controller supports. Personally I have Home-Assistant running the latest MySensors 2.0 Wifi (ESP) gateway no problems.
-
@Tore-André-Rosander
for pros, I think serial gw is more secure. I mean esp is wifi, serial gw is only connected to controller. Of course controller is connected to network, but esp is just one more door directly connected to mysensors. Cons, not as verstatile as esp ;) -
Thanks for the response, i tested the esp gateway and it looks good. But i think im going for the serial gateway just to eliminate the need for WiFi in my setup. So if the WiFi is messing up during the night the mysensors network still works.
-
I like the new setup of the MySensors lib, but after getting some more gray hairs and replacing processors, boards and all the other stuff I noticed, there is something wrong with it.
Following effect (tried it with Arduino versions 1.6.3 up to 1.6.9 on a Mac with El Capitan):
I've setup a clean Arduino environment and installed the new MySensors lib. Wrote a program, where I wanted to test some interrupt routines with MySensor and it did not work. ok, seemed to be a bug and watchdog stepped in. Fixed software, rewrote software, created a small test program and always the same issue. I used Node Id 5 for this one.
Then, after a whole day and changing processors and all other stuff I loaded a file, working with 2.0-beta and using Node Id 7. And what I got where the same messages on the gateway, just with Node Id 7. ???
In fact I got a presentation of HUM (my tests with Node 5), but with Node 7, although the file never had anything to do with HUM.
Verseifen with an Arduino Nano board, installed a very small MySensor example script on it and same effect.So, some pieces of the initial program were once compiled and resided in the system, regardless what source you are using afterwards.
Deleted the new 2.0.0 lib, installed my 2.0.0-beta and everything is fine. Switched back to 2.0.0 stable and instantly the old binary was back there.
Any ideas?