Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Announcements
  3. 💬 Battery Powered Sensors

💬 Battery Powered Sensors

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
battery
347 Posts 55 Posters 67.1k Views 53 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G gloob

    If you are using the first sketch you dont have to use a seperate pin to measure the input voltage. There are also no resistors.

    You can run this on a bare ATmega with minimal hardware.

    N Offline
    N Offline
    Nicklas Starkel
    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    @gloob thanks!
    One would think running with no resistors and not using a separate PIN would be better.

    @hek or @mfalkvidd , any comments as to why the original sketch is preferred over the other 'way' in this article?

    hekH 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Nicklas Starkel

      @gloob thanks!
      One would think running with no resistors and not using a separate PIN would be better.

      @hek or @mfalkvidd , any comments as to why the original sketch is preferred over the other 'way' in this article?

      hekH Offline
      hekH Offline
      hek
      Admin
      wrote on last edited by
      #35

      @Nicklas-Starkel

      https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/186/new-library-to-read-arduino-vcc-supply-level-without-resistors-for-battery-powered-sensor-nodes-that-do-not-use-a-voltage-regulator-but-connect-directly-to-the-batteries

      N 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • hekH hek

        @Nicklas-Starkel

        https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/186/new-library-to-read-arduino-vcc-supply-level-without-resistors-for-battery-powered-sensor-nodes-that-do-not-use-a-voltage-regulator-but-connect-directly-to-the-batteries

        N Offline
        N Offline
        Nicklas Starkel
        wrote on last edited by
        #36

        @hek , I've read that post several times :)
        Since it was so outdated (2 years) I naturally assumed the 'battery powering article' was a newer way to do it (especially since mys2.0).
        Also, the post you linked to is attributed if you use no voltage regulator.
        And in the article this is also one of the things you are recommended to remove, hence making it even more confusing as to why the article describes another way than the post.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • Meshx86M Offline
          Meshx86M Offline
          Meshx86
          wrote on last edited by Meshx86
          #37

          i just want to get this once and for all, so others coming by gets it directly instead of going through all the 2 threads posts, please correct me if i am wrong:

          1- using the voltage divider is needed if there is a voltage regulator / booster where where VBatt != Vcc.
          2- using the voltage regulator is not needed if the voltage regulator is removed / no booster is used (powering directly from 2 x AA batteries) where VBatt == Vcc.

          *I've noticed the 2nd method requires inputting battrie's DMM measured values vs arduino ones for correction, is this a down side if you need to change the battery later on ? or is it just programmed once ? and does the 1st method rquirs these corrections too ?

          Cheers

          GertSandersG 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Meshx86M Meshx86

            i just want to get this once and for all, so others coming by gets it directly instead of going through all the 2 threads posts, please correct me if i am wrong:

            1- using the voltage divider is needed if there is a voltage regulator / booster where where VBatt != Vcc.
            2- using the voltage regulator is not needed if the voltage regulator is removed / no booster is used (powering directly from 2 x AA batteries) where VBatt == Vcc.

            *I've noticed the 2nd method requires inputting battrie's DMM measured values vs arduino ones for correction, is this a down side if you need to change the battery later on ? or is it just programmed once ? and does the 1st method rquirs these corrections too ?

            Cheers

            GertSandersG Offline
            GertSandersG Offline
            GertSanders
            Hardware Contributor
            wrote on last edited by
            #38

            @Meshx86
            actually, you need a voltage divider if the voltage to be measured is above the maximum allowed by the processor at the speed you are running it.

            If Vcc is 5V, then any voltage above 5V should be measured via a voltage divider.
            If Vcc is 3.3V same principle, but you could get away with measuring 5V directly (would not kill the processor), but your values may be off.

            Meshx86M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • GertSandersG GertSanders

              @Meshx86
              actually, you need a voltage divider if the voltage to be measured is above the maximum allowed by the processor at the speed you are running it.

              If Vcc is 5V, then any voltage above 5V should be measured via a voltage divider.
              If Vcc is 3.3V same principle, but you could get away with measuring 5V directly (would not kill the processor), but your values may be off.

              Meshx86M Offline
              Meshx86M Offline
              Meshx86
              wrote on last edited by Meshx86
              #39

              @GertSanders following the instructions of this post suggest using Alkaline batteries (apparently Li-ion aren't a good idea for sensor nodes ?! plus they are expensive), the optimal solution would be using 2 x AA batteries as some ans this post suggested.

              I believe there is no way 2 x AA batteries in series would measure anywhere near 3.3v, the max i measured with brand new batteries was 3.2v.

              my major concern is:
              would i still need to the do the voltage corrections when using the voltage divider ? if so, does that need to be reprogrammed every time you replace the battery ?

              sorry to bring this again @Yveaux @axillent

              GertSandersG 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Meshx86M Meshx86

                @GertSanders following the instructions of this post suggest using Alkaline batteries (apparently Li-ion aren't a good idea for sensor nodes ?! plus they are expensive), the optimal solution would be using 2 x AA batteries as some ans this post suggested.

                I believe there is no way 2 x AA batteries in series would measure anywhere near 3.3v, the max i measured with brand new batteries was 3.2v.

                my major concern is:
                would i still need to the do the voltage corrections when using the voltage divider ? if so, does that need to be reprogrammed every time you replace the battery ?

                sorry to bring this again @Yveaux @axillent

                GertSandersG Offline
                GertSandersG Offline
                GertSanders
                Hardware Contributor
                wrote on last edited by
                #40

                @Meshx86
                No problem to ask. I use the intern measurement method, which uses the internal 1.1V reference of the atmega328, so even if the Vcc value changes from 3.2V -> 2.6V, the reference will always be 1.1V, and the internal method allows you to calculate the actual measured battery voltage based on a difference with the reference, even with a declining value on Vcc (if powered by the same batteries).

                Meshx86M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • GertSandersG GertSanders

                  @Meshx86
                  No problem to ask. I use the intern measurement method, which uses the internal 1.1V reference of the atmega328, so even if the Vcc value changes from 3.2V -> 2.6V, the reference will always be 1.1V, and the internal method allows you to calculate the actual measured battery voltage based on a difference with the reference, even with a declining value on Vcc (if powered by the same batteries).

                  Meshx86M Offline
                  Meshx86M Offline
                  Meshx86
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #41

                  @GertSanders sorry mate, am more of a software guy..

                  according to the lib i've seen and @Yveaux's example for the internal method, at the begining you need to define a corrective value :

                  const float VccCorrection = 1.0/1.0;  // Measured Vcc by multimeter divided by reported Vcc
                  
                  Vcc vcc(VccCorrection);
                  

                  is this necessary for an accurate reading ? and is the corrective value need to be just entered once (like a calibration per arduino) or need to be reconfigured every time you replace a battery ?

                  GertSandersG 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Offline
                    N Offline
                    Nicklas Starkel
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #42

                    Good article/site on why Alkaline is the best way to go for Mysensors nodes :)
                    http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/elevating_self_discharge

                    AWIA 1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • Meshx86M Meshx86

                      @GertSanders sorry mate, am more of a software guy..

                      according to the lib i've seen and @Yveaux's example for the internal method, at the begining you need to define a corrective value :

                      const float VccCorrection = 1.0/1.0;  // Measured Vcc by multimeter divided by reported Vcc
                      
                      Vcc vcc(VccCorrection);
                      

                      is this necessary for an accurate reading ? and is the corrective value need to be just entered once (like a calibration per arduino) or need to be reconfigured every time you replace a battery ?

                      GertSandersG Offline
                      GertSandersG Offline
                      GertSanders
                      Hardware Contributor
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #43

                      @Meshx86
                      The corrective value is needed every time you change a battery, AND if you need high accuracy.
                      On my battery based nodes I do not have a need for absolute accuracy, I just need to see the trend of the Vcc value.
                      Changing the battery happens every 12-24 months (depends on the use), so I'm not very interested in absolute accuracy. If you need real accurate measuring, I would suggest a real Analog-To_Digital chip.

                      Meshx86M 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • GertSandersG GertSanders

                        @Meshx86
                        The corrective value is needed every time you change a battery, AND if you need high accuracy.
                        On my battery based nodes I do not have a need for absolute accuracy, I just need to see the trend of the Vcc value.
                        Changing the battery happens every 12-24 months (depends on the use), so I'm not very interested in absolute accuracy. If you need real accurate measuring, I would suggest a real Analog-To_Digital chip.

                        Meshx86M Offline
                        Meshx86M Offline
                        Meshx86
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #44

                        @GertSanders thanks , i think accuracy isn't a deal breaker, i believe everyone's concern is to just know when the batteries need to be replaced (hopefully that can be done without specifying the voltage correction).

                        YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • Meshx86M Meshx86

                          @GertSanders thanks , i think accuracy isn't a deal breaker, i believe everyone's concern is to just know when the batteries need to be replaced (hopefully that can be done without specifying the voltage correction).

                          YveauxY Offline
                          YveauxY Offline
                          Yveaux
                          Mod
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #45

                          @Meshx86 ok, being quoted so many times I can also add my 5 cents :smile:
                          The correction factor is optional. You can use it to improve the measured voltage, as the internal voltage reference is only accurate up to so many percentage (have to look up the number). It is unique to the arduino used.
                          This factor should however not depend on the batteries, possibly on environmental factors (e.g. Temperature)

                          http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                          Meshx86M 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • YveauxY Yveaux

                            @Meshx86 ok, being quoted so many times I can also add my 5 cents :smile:
                            The correction factor is optional. You can use it to improve the measured voltage, as the internal voltage reference is only accurate up to so many percentage (have to look up the number). It is unique to the arduino used.
                            This factor should however not depend on the batteries, possibly on environmental factors (e.g. Temperature)

                            Meshx86M Offline
                            Meshx86M Offline
                            Meshx86
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #46

                            @Yveaux one last, i promise :P

                            if max battery voltage is actually 3.2v, does that mean that the battery percentage would show 100% for quite sometime before it starts dropping below 3.0v (assuming vmax is set to 3.0) ? or would it increase the inaccuracy gap ?

                            YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Meshx86M Meshx86

                              @Yveaux one last, i promise :P

                              if max battery voltage is actually 3.2v, does that mean that the battery percentage would show 100% for quite sometime before it starts dropping below 3.0v (assuming vmax is set to 3.0) ? or would it increase the inaccuracy gap ?

                              YveauxY Offline
                              YveauxY Offline
                              Yveaux
                              Mod
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #47

                              @Meshx86 the function Read_Perc() takes a boolean as 3rd parameter. Default it's true, which means the result is clipped to 0..100% range.
                              So, if maximum is set to 3v, and you are currently above it, it will report 100% until you drop below 3v.

                              http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • N Nicklas Starkel

                                Good article/site on why Alkaline is the best way to go for Mysensors nodes :)
                                http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/elevating_self_discharge

                                AWIA Offline
                                AWIA Offline
                                AWI
                                Hero Member
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #48

                                @Nicklas-Starkel The article mostly talks about rechargeable batteries. I prefer non rechargeable Lithium batteries (like coin cells) for their energy density and very low self discharge.
                                My major concern with (cheap) alkaline batteries is their leakage of aggressive chemicals. I had to trash my first nodes because of this :unamused:

                                N tonnerre33T 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • AWIA AWI

                                  @Nicklas-Starkel The article mostly talks about rechargeable batteries. I prefer non rechargeable Lithium batteries (like coin cells) for their energy density and very low self discharge.
                                  My major concern with (cheap) alkaline batteries is their leakage of aggressive chemicals. I had to trash my first nodes because of this :unamused:

                                  N Offline
                                  N Offline
                                  Nicklas Starkel
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #49

                                  @AWI in the first part it states:
                                  "Primary cells such as lithium-metal and alkaline retain the stored energy best, and can be kept in storage for several years."
                                  So you are correct and between Alkaline and Lithium-metal maybe the latter would be best. :)
                                  I have no experience with coin cells and will do some testing with them as soon as I can.
                                  Since this is the battery article, would you please tell me what you use and how you use it. What you expected and if the batteries lived up to your expectations. Would be cool to know as you've had more experience then me (and many like me)!

                                  AWIA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • AWIA AWI

                                    @Nicklas-Starkel The article mostly talks about rechargeable batteries. I prefer non rechargeable Lithium batteries (like coin cells) for their energy density and very low self discharge.
                                    My major concern with (cheap) alkaline batteries is their leakage of aggressive chemicals. I had to trash my first nodes because of this :unamused:

                                    tonnerre33T Offline
                                    tonnerre33T Offline
                                    tonnerre33
                                    Hardware Contributor
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #50

                                    @AWI I'm agree with you but coin cells have less capacity. The difference of the self discharge between coin cells and alkaline is not important (1% vs 2%), but the capacity and size are.

                                    Here is a link with the Battery self-discharge rates :
                                    http://www.gammon.com.au/power

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • N Nicklas Starkel

                                      @AWI in the first part it states:
                                      "Primary cells such as lithium-metal and alkaline retain the stored energy best, and can be kept in storage for several years."
                                      So you are correct and between Alkaline and Lithium-metal maybe the latter would be best. :)
                                      I have no experience with coin cells and will do some testing with them as soon as I can.
                                      Since this is the battery article, would you please tell me what you use and how you use it. What you expected and if the batteries lived up to your expectations. Would be cool to know as you've had more experience then me (and many like me)!

                                      AWIA Offline
                                      AWIA Offline
                                      AWI
                                      Hero Member
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #51

                                      @Nicklas-Starkel I mostly use a 'large' version lithium cell i.e. Cr123. These were used large in compact camera's and have a huge capacity and very little self discharge. My best example is the sensor in the fridge which measure temp and humidity every 10 secs and sends with nrf24l01 (MySensors of course). This one runs for almost two years now and has a stable 3.02V since the second month.

                                      The coin cells need special care a these have a high 'internal resistance'. You need to be careful with designing the sketch so that the load is as short and light as possible.

                                      There are some of my postings on this site which elaborate on the subject. (I'm on a mobile phone right now...)

                                      N 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • AWIA AWI

                                        @Nicklas-Starkel I mostly use a 'large' version lithium cell i.e. Cr123. These were used large in compact camera's and have a huge capacity and very little self discharge. My best example is the sensor in the fridge which measure temp and humidity every 10 secs and sends with nrf24l01 (MySensors of course). This one runs for almost two years now and has a stable 3.02V since the second month.

                                        The coin cells need special care a these have a high 'internal resistance'. You need to be careful with designing the sketch so that the load is as short and light as possible.

                                        There are some of my postings on this site which elaborate on the subject. (I'm on a mobile phone right now...)

                                        N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        Nicklas Starkel
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #52

                                        @AWI OMG there is so many options when you look at it!
                                        I think it all boils down to design (size) or money.
                                        Normal AA roughly 0.3EUR/pc are quite large but OK power but cheap
                                        CR123 roughly 2.5EUR/pc are quite small and OK power but expensive
                                        Coin cell roughly 1EUR/pc and they are the smallest but not packing a good punch while being semi cheap/expensive.

                                        Obviously I have to build one node with each and put them in flowerpots around the flat to see in in action :)

                                        And to top it off, I know there is a company in USA that has created a new battery that will double 'Ah' in same size batteries. They should launch this month i think, but think they will go for cellphone makers in the beginning.

                                        parachutesjP 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • N Nicklas Starkel

                                          @AWI OMG there is so many options when you look at it!
                                          I think it all boils down to design (size) or money.
                                          Normal AA roughly 0.3EUR/pc are quite large but OK power but cheap
                                          CR123 roughly 2.5EUR/pc are quite small and OK power but expensive
                                          Coin cell roughly 1EUR/pc and they are the smallest but not packing a good punch while being semi cheap/expensive.

                                          Obviously I have to build one node with each and put them in flowerpots around the flat to see in in action :)

                                          And to top it off, I know there is a company in USA that has created a new battery that will double 'Ah' in same size batteries. They should launch this month i think, but think they will go for cellphone makers in the beginning.

                                          parachutesjP Offline
                                          parachutesjP Offline
                                          parachutesj
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #53

                                          I am not getting it...

                                          I have a 3.3V Pro Mini, it is connected to my table power supply and want it to be powered by a coin cell later. To test the VCC lib, I set

                                          const float VccExpected   = 3.21;
                                          

                                          What do I need to put here?

                                          const float VccCorrection = 3.21/3.21;
                                          

                                          It always returns BatteryPercentage of 2 or 3% seems the function is not calculating right. Anyhow I saw there is another function to call Read_Volts()

                                          float volts = (float)vcc.Read_Volts();
                                          int myPerc = volts *100 / VccExpected; 
                                          

                                          So "myPerc" returns a value of 98% which seems feasible, also when reducing Voltage it drops.
                                          But still, not getting the values with the build in function read_Perc()

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          17

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular