Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. ESP8266 gateway and sensor node not talking - noobie

ESP8266 gateway and sensor node not talking - noobie

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
megadht11esp8266
37 Posts 6 Posters 20.2k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hek
    Admin
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    Yep,

    https://github.com/mysensors/Arduino/pull/287

    Y 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • H hek

      Yep,

      https://github.com/mysensors/Arduino/pull/287

      Y Offline
      Y Offline
      Yveaux
      Mod
      wrote on last edited by
      #25

      @hek :+1:

      http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mersing
        wrote on last edited by
        #26

        This is working great !

        Tx for this !

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • chrilleC Offline
          chrilleC Offline
          chrille
          wrote on last edited by
          #27

          I am seeing something similar with RFM69 (specifically RFM69CW) and ESP8266. I have build an ESP8266 gateway based on the GatewayESP8266 sketch and this is what I changed

          #define MY_RADIO_RFM69
          #define MY_GATEWAY_ESP8266
          #define MY_RFM69_FREQUENCY   RF69_868MHZ
          #define MY_RF69_IRQ_PIN 4
          #define MY_RF69_SPI_CS 15
          #define MY_RF69_IRQ_NUM 4
          

          I build a sensor node with the DallasTemperatureSensor sketch on an Arduino Mini Pro and defined

          #define MY_RADIO_RFM69
          #define MY_RFM69_FREQUENCY   RF69_868MHZ
          

          When I start up the gateway I see

          0;255;3;0;9;Starting gateway (RRNGE-, 2.0.0-beta)
          0;255;3;0;9;Radio init successful.
          ....scandone
          state: 0 -> 2 (b0)
          state: 2 -> 3 (0)
          state: 3 -> 5 (10)
          add 0
          aid 8
          cnt
          
          connected with AP, channel 1
          ip:62.x.x.x,mask:255.255.255.128,gw:62.x.x.x
          .IP: 62.x.x.x
          0;255;3;0;9;Init complete, id=0, parent=0, distance=0
          

          So far so good - I assume all the radio wiring is OK, since the radio init is successful

          On the sensor node I see

          Starting sensor (RRNNA-, 2.0.0-beta)
          Radio init successful.
          find parent 
          send: 255-255-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,st=bc:
          find parent
          send: 255-255-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,st=bc:
          find parent
          send: 255-255-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,st=bc:
          Init complete, id=255, parent=255, distance=255
          

          As soon as the sensor node is started the ESP8266 crashes with a WDT reset

          Soft WDT reset
          
          ctx: cont
          sp: 3ffef370 end: 3ffef630 offset: 01b0
          
          >>>stack>>>
          3ffef520:  00000001 3ffef6d4 3ffef964 00000000
          3ffef530:  00000024 3ffef6d4 3ffef964 40202436
          3ffef540:  3ffe8432 00000000 3ffef6d4 402024bc
          3ffef550:  3ffe8432 00000000 3ffef6d4 402026a7
          3ffef560:  3ffef6f2 00000001 3ffef6d4 40202b87
          3ffef570:  3fffdae0 00000000 3ffee600 3ffef6ac
          3ffef580:  3fffdae0 3ffef6f1 3ffef6d4 40202cf4
          3ffef590:  3fff1210 00000000 3ffee600 402042b4
          3ffef5a0:  00000000 00000002 3ffef82c 40203d20
          3ffef5b0:  00000000 3ffef6d4 3ffef964 4020247c
          3ffef5c0:  401057ff 00000400 00000103 3ffef5f0
          3ffef5d0:  3ffef5e0 00000004 3ffef6cd 4020249c
          3ffef5e0:  3ffe8920 00000000 00000000 3ffee608
          3ffef5f0:  3fffdae0 00000000 3ffee600 3ffee608
          3ffef600:  3fffdae0 00000000 3ffee600 40203e6c
          3ffef610:  feefeffe feefeffe 3ffee600 402045b4
          3ffef620:  feefeffe feefeffe 3ffee610 40100114
          <<<stack<<<
          

          The libraries are 2.0 beta as from a few days ago. I consider the power to the ESP8266 to be OK, since I use the same for en NRF24 based gateway and also for several other ESP modules.

          From the thread I understand that known issues should be fixed in the current beta. Any ideas on how to move on?

          Y 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • chrilleC chrille

            I am seeing something similar with RFM69 (specifically RFM69CW) and ESP8266. I have build an ESP8266 gateway based on the GatewayESP8266 sketch and this is what I changed

            #define MY_RADIO_RFM69
            #define MY_GATEWAY_ESP8266
            #define MY_RFM69_FREQUENCY   RF69_868MHZ
            #define MY_RF69_IRQ_PIN 4
            #define MY_RF69_SPI_CS 15
            #define MY_RF69_IRQ_NUM 4
            

            I build a sensor node with the DallasTemperatureSensor sketch on an Arduino Mini Pro and defined

            #define MY_RADIO_RFM69
            #define MY_RFM69_FREQUENCY   RF69_868MHZ
            

            When I start up the gateway I see

            0;255;3;0;9;Starting gateway (RRNGE-, 2.0.0-beta)
            0;255;3;0;9;Radio init successful.
            ....scandone
            state: 0 -> 2 (b0)
            state: 2 -> 3 (0)
            state: 3 -> 5 (10)
            add 0
            aid 8
            cnt
            
            connected with AP, channel 1
            ip:62.x.x.x,mask:255.255.255.128,gw:62.x.x.x
            .IP: 62.x.x.x
            0;255;3;0;9;Init complete, id=0, parent=0, distance=0
            

            So far so good - I assume all the radio wiring is OK, since the radio init is successful

            On the sensor node I see

            Starting sensor (RRNNA-, 2.0.0-beta)
            Radio init successful.
            find parent 
            send: 255-255-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,st=bc:
            find parent
            send: 255-255-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,st=bc:
            find parent
            send: 255-255-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,st=bc:
            Init complete, id=255, parent=255, distance=255
            

            As soon as the sensor node is started the ESP8266 crashes with a WDT reset

            Soft WDT reset
            
            ctx: cont
            sp: 3ffef370 end: 3ffef630 offset: 01b0
            
            >>>stack>>>
            3ffef520:  00000001 3ffef6d4 3ffef964 00000000
            3ffef530:  00000024 3ffef6d4 3ffef964 40202436
            3ffef540:  3ffe8432 00000000 3ffef6d4 402024bc
            3ffef550:  3ffe8432 00000000 3ffef6d4 402026a7
            3ffef560:  3ffef6f2 00000001 3ffef6d4 40202b87
            3ffef570:  3fffdae0 00000000 3ffee600 3ffef6ac
            3ffef580:  3fffdae0 3ffef6f1 3ffef6d4 40202cf4
            3ffef590:  3fff1210 00000000 3ffee600 402042b4
            3ffef5a0:  00000000 00000002 3ffef82c 40203d20
            3ffef5b0:  00000000 3ffef6d4 3ffef964 4020247c
            3ffef5c0:  401057ff 00000400 00000103 3ffef5f0
            3ffef5d0:  3ffef5e0 00000004 3ffef6cd 4020249c
            3ffef5e0:  3ffe8920 00000000 00000000 3ffee608
            3ffef5f0:  3fffdae0 00000000 3ffee600 3ffee608
            3ffef600:  3fffdae0 00000000 3ffee600 40203e6c
            3ffef610:  feefeffe feefeffe 3ffee600 402045b4
            3ffef620:  feefeffe feefeffe 3ffee610 40100114
            <<<stack<<<
            

            The libraries are 2.0 beta as from a few days ago. I consider the power to the ESP8266 to be OK, since I use the same for en NRF24 based gateway and also for several other ESP modules.

            From the thread I understand that known issues should be fixed in the current beta. Any ideas on how to move on?

            Y Offline
            Y Offline
            Yveaux
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by
            #28

            @chrille Try adding the following line to your setup() function:

            ESP.wdtDisable();
            

            It should disable the (software) watchdog on ESP. See if it continues, or if it will now just hang.

            http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

            chrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Y Yveaux

              @chrille Try adding the following line to your setup() function:

              ESP.wdtDisable();
              

              It should disable the (software) watchdog on ESP. See if it continues, or if it will now just hang.

              chrilleC Offline
              chrilleC Offline
              chrille
              wrote on last edited by
              #29

              @Yveaux Just tried that. The change removed the watchdog message and the stack trace, but the module still reboots

              chrilleC Y 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • chrilleC chrille

                @Yveaux Just tried that. The change removed the watchdog message and the stack trace, but the module still reboots

                chrilleC Offline
                chrilleC Offline
                chrille
                wrote on last edited by
                #30

                ...I also tried to change TIME_OUT in rfm69.cpp to 500 as suggested by Fabien. Doesn't make any difference

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • chrilleC chrille

                  @Yveaux Just tried that. The change removed the watchdog message and the stack trace, but the module still reboots

                  Y Offline
                  Y Offline
                  Yveaux
                  Mod
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #31

                  @chrille said:

                  the module still reboots

                  Probably the hardware watchdog kicks in then...

                  http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                  chrilleC 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • Y Yveaux

                    @chrille said:

                    the module still reboots

                    Probably the hardware watchdog kicks in then...

                    chrilleC Offline
                    chrilleC Offline
                    chrille
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #32

                    @Yveaux I did some further tests and it may be related to the inclusion mode feature. At least disabling this makes things more stable - but I still haven't got the radio side working reliable. When this is working I will go back to the gateway and see if I can find out what triggers the crash

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Y Yveaux

                      @chrille said:

                      the module still reboots

                      Probably the hardware watchdog kicks in then...

                      chrilleC Offline
                      chrilleC Offline
                      chrille
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #33

                      @Yveaux I think I have narrowed down the issue now to this code in RFM69.cpp

                      void RFM69::sendACK(const void* buffer, byte bufferSize) {
                      debug(PSTR("RFM69: void sendACK\n"));
                        byte sender = SENDERID;
                        debug(PSTR("RFM69: sendACK - entering while()\n"));
                        while (!canSend()) receiveDone();
                        sendFrame(sender, buffer, bufferSize, false, true);
                      }
                      

                      (The debug lines are added by me)

                      Most of the time the WDT kicks in, after logging "entering while()" - occasionally it will reach sendFrame() and log a "read: " line but then the WDT kicks in when it gets to the while() loop again.
                      sendAck is called from sendFrame, that disables interrupts, by calling select()

                      With a bunch of additional debug turned on, this is what I get on the console

                      0;255;3;0;9;Init complete, id=0, parent=0, distance=0
                      chg_B:-60
                      chg_B:-120
                      0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: interruptHandler
                      0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: IRQ handler - select chip
                      0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: IRQ handler - release chip
                      0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: IRQ handler - read RSSI
                      0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: receiveDone() - payload
                      0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: void sendACK
                      chg_B:-60
                      0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: sendACK - entering while()
                      0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: sendFrame()
                      0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: interruptHandler
                      0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: IRQ handler - read RSSI
                      0;255;3;0;9;read: 255-255-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
                      0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: interruptHandler
                      0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: IRQ handler - select chip
                      0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: IRQ handler - release chip
                      0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: IRQ handler - read RSSI
                      0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: receiveDone() - payload
                      0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: void sendACK
                      0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: sendACK - entering while()
                      
                      Soft WDT reset
                      
                      ctx: cont
                      sp: 3ffefa70 end: 3ffefd30 offset: 01b0
                      
                      >>>stack>>>
                      3ffefc20:  00000001 3ffefdd4 3ffeffdc 000000ff
                      3ffefc30:  00000024 3ffefdd4 3ffeffdc 402022da
                      3ffefc40:  3ffe8496 00000000 3ffefdd4 40202360
                      3ffefc50:  00000000 00000000 3ffefdd4 4020254b
                      3ffefc60:  3ffefdf2 00000000 3ffefdd4 402037f9
                      3ffefc70:  3fffdc20 00000000 3ffefdd4 3ffefdac
                      3ffefc80:  3fffdc20 3ffefdf1 3ffefdd4 4020385c
                      3ffefc90:  00000003 00000000 3ffeecf8 40204035
                      3ffefca0:  00000003 00000000 00000000 00000000
                      3ffefcb0:  3ffefd58 3ffefdd4 3ffeffdc 3ffeed00
                      3ffefcc0:  3ffefe00 00000000 3ffefe98 40203aec
                      3ffefcd0:  00000003 00000000 000000ff 00000000
                      3ffefce0:  000000ff 00000002 00000000 00000000
                      3ffefcf0:  3fffdc20 00000000 3ffeecf8 3ffeed00
                      3ffefd00:  3fffdc20 00000000 3ffeecf8 40203c06
                      3ffefd10:  00000000 00000000 3ffeecf8 4020432c
                      3ffefd20:  00000000 00000000 3ffeed10 40100114
                      <<<stack<<<
                      

                      Any ideas on how to fix this, would be greatly appreciated!

                      Y 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • chrilleC chrille

                        @Yveaux I think I have narrowed down the issue now to this code in RFM69.cpp

                        void RFM69::sendACK(const void* buffer, byte bufferSize) {
                        debug(PSTR("RFM69: void sendACK\n"));
                          byte sender = SENDERID;
                          debug(PSTR("RFM69: sendACK - entering while()\n"));
                          while (!canSend()) receiveDone();
                          sendFrame(sender, buffer, bufferSize, false, true);
                        }
                        

                        (The debug lines are added by me)

                        Most of the time the WDT kicks in, after logging "entering while()" - occasionally it will reach sendFrame() and log a "read: " line but then the WDT kicks in when it gets to the while() loop again.
                        sendAck is called from sendFrame, that disables interrupts, by calling select()

                        With a bunch of additional debug turned on, this is what I get on the console

                        0;255;3;0;9;Init complete, id=0, parent=0, distance=0
                        chg_B:-60
                        chg_B:-120
                        0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: interruptHandler
                        0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: IRQ handler - select chip
                        0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: IRQ handler - release chip
                        0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: IRQ handler - read RSSI
                        0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: receiveDone() - payload
                        0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: void sendACK
                        chg_B:-60
                        0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: sendACK - entering while()
                        0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: sendFrame()
                        0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: interruptHandler
                        0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: IRQ handler - read RSSI
                        0;255;3;0;9;read: 255-255-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
                        0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: interruptHandler
                        0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: IRQ handler - select chip
                        0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: IRQ handler - release chip
                        0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: IRQ handler - read RSSI
                        0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: receiveDone() - payload
                        0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: void sendACK
                        0;255;3;0;9;RFM69: sendACK - entering while()
                        
                        Soft WDT reset
                        
                        ctx: cont
                        sp: 3ffefa70 end: 3ffefd30 offset: 01b0
                        
                        >>>stack>>>
                        3ffefc20:  00000001 3ffefdd4 3ffeffdc 000000ff
                        3ffefc30:  00000024 3ffefdd4 3ffeffdc 402022da
                        3ffefc40:  3ffe8496 00000000 3ffefdd4 40202360
                        3ffefc50:  00000000 00000000 3ffefdd4 4020254b
                        3ffefc60:  3ffefdf2 00000000 3ffefdd4 402037f9
                        3ffefc70:  3fffdc20 00000000 3ffefdd4 3ffefdac
                        3ffefc80:  3fffdc20 3ffefdf1 3ffefdd4 4020385c
                        3ffefc90:  00000003 00000000 3ffeecf8 40204035
                        3ffefca0:  00000003 00000000 00000000 00000000
                        3ffefcb0:  3ffefd58 3ffefdd4 3ffeffdc 3ffeed00
                        3ffefcc0:  3ffefe00 00000000 3ffefe98 40203aec
                        3ffefcd0:  00000003 00000000 000000ff 00000000
                        3ffefce0:  000000ff 00000002 00000000 00000000
                        3ffefcf0:  3fffdc20 00000000 3ffeecf8 3ffeed00
                        3ffefd00:  3fffdc20 00000000 3ffeecf8 40203c06
                        3ffefd10:  00000000 00000000 3ffeecf8 4020432c
                        3ffefd20:  00000000 00000000 3ffeed10 40100114
                        <<<stack<<<
                        

                        Any ideas on how to fix this, would be greatly appreciated!

                        Y Offline
                        Y Offline
                        Yveaux
                        Mod
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #34

                        @chrille I'm not familiar with rfm implementation, but you could try adding a call to yield() inside the while loop.

                        http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                        chrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Y Yveaux

                          @chrille I'm not familiar with rfm implementation, but you could try adding a call to yield() inside the while loop.

                          chrilleC Offline
                          chrilleC Offline
                          chrille
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #35

                          @Yveaux Thank you very much. This seems to have fixed the issue now!

                          Y 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • chrilleC chrille

                            @Yveaux Thank you very much. This seems to have fixed the issue now!

                            Y Offline
                            Y Offline
                            Yveaux
                            Mod
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #36

                            @chrille Could you create a pull-request (or a bug report) for this fix in MySensors' github repo ?

                            http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                            chrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Y Yveaux

                              @chrille Could you create a pull-request (or a bug report) for this fix in MySensors' github repo ?

                              chrilleC Offline
                              chrilleC Offline
                              chrille
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #37

                              @Yveaux I already did! https://github.com/mysensors/Arduino/pull/396

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0

                              Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                              Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                              With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                              Register Login
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              14

                              Online

                              12.0k

                              Users

                              11.2k

                              Topics

                              113.4k

                              Posts


                              Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • MySensors
                              • OpenHardware.io
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular