Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. Is ARM the future of MySensors?

Is ARM the future of MySensors?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
31 Posts 12 Posters 5.4k Views 15 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • alowhumA alowhum

    I've been testing the wonderful MY_SIGNING_SIMPLE_PASSWD feature on the 2.2 branch.

    So far most of my nodes that currently use an Arduino nano will not have enough memory to run things.

    So..

    Does this secretly imply that if you want to fully embrace MySensors 2.2 you'll need too switch to more powerful hardware, like STM32? or ESP8266? Or one of the other new IoT chips?

    What is the platform that most people are switching to?

    "just good enough" as a strategy
    I actually really like Arduino as a platform because it offers something the more powerful platforms don't: they are very hard to hack or take over. There simply isn't enough space left for malicious actors' code.

    For example, after reading about harddrives having persistent malware through ARM-based controller chips, I've become quite aware of this attack vector.If you follow Slashdot a bit you'll know that anything with a chip is a target nowadays.

    So, personally, whatever becomes the new "recommended platform", I hope it will stay 'cloudless' by default.

    Other discussions:
    https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/8852/best-hardware-for-gateway-with-encryption-and-signing/4

    gohanG Offline
    gohanG Offline
    gohan
    Mod
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    @alowhum every news about malware needs to be put in the right context: malware programs can infect a target a low level system if they are made specifically for the purpose and in addition there must be a way to actually program the target, so if you have an arduino board that can be only programmed through serial port, I seriously doubt you will be a possible target for malware infection, otherwise if it was that easy we wouldn't struggle that much to have FOTA updates working.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • alowhumA alowhum

      I've been testing the wonderful MY_SIGNING_SIMPLE_PASSWD feature on the 2.2 branch.

      So far most of my nodes that currently use an Arduino nano will not have enough memory to run things.

      So..

      Does this secretly imply that if you want to fully embrace MySensors 2.2 you'll need too switch to more powerful hardware, like STM32? or ESP8266? Or one of the other new IoT chips?

      What is the platform that most people are switching to?

      "just good enough" as a strategy
      I actually really like Arduino as a platform because it offers something the more powerful platforms don't: they are very hard to hack or take over. There simply isn't enough space left for malicious actors' code.

      For example, after reading about harddrives having persistent malware through ARM-based controller chips, I've become quite aware of this attack vector.If you follow Slashdot a bit you'll know that anything with a chip is a target nowadays.

      So, personally, whatever becomes the new "recommended platform", I hope it will stay 'cloudless' by default.

      Other discussions:
      https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/8852/best-hardware-for-gateway-with-encryption-and-signing/4

      NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDie
      Hero Member
      wrote on last edited by NeverDie
      #4

      @alowhum said in Is ARM the future of MySensors?:

      What is the platform that most people are switching to?

      I think an integrated MCU+radio, such as the nRF5, will be the inevitable winner for reasons of cost, size, capability, and efficiency. There may be cases, though, where you want to use a LoRa or other radio for superior range. It's not completely clear yet how well the nRF52840 will stack up in that department (since final silicon isn't yet available, and we can only speculate as to its pricing), but I'm guessing it will be capable enough for most home automation.

      That said, the atmega328p is just plain hard to beat as far as ultra low (~100na) sleep current goes, and it has the virtue of relative simplicity, so I think it will be around for quite a while yet.

      1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • nagelcN Offline
        nagelcN Offline
        nagelc
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        I think the NRF5 with integrated radio will be the best solution for most home automation tasks as long as it has enough range to do a typical house without repeaters. But, I am fascinated by the "blue pill" stm32 boards -- very much like an Arduino Nano, but with modern ARM. It's a larger board, I don't know about battery operation yet, but for a powered sensor, it is easy to use, powerful, and cheap.
        Thanks to @NeverDie I also have a RA-01 LoRa module on a ESP8266 running as a gateway. So many amazing technologies . . ..

        It's hard to fault a ProMini with an NRF2 or RMF69. Those networks will probably always be reporting temperature and motion in my house. But I am always excited to think about the capabilities of these new technologies, particularly more memory. For me, it is a hobby and I can afford to try things just for fun and to learn about them, but even I must settle on a technology so I can get back to making interesting sensors and actuators.

        I keep looking for HopeRF to come out with an ARM-RFM combo to compete with NRF5, but they do not seem to be going that direction. Right now, I would bet on NRF5 as the best technology going forward.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • D Offline
          D Offline
          DavidZH
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          I certainly can see the appeal for the NRF5 series, which wil work perfect in areas with detached and terraced houses. But in Urban areas with lots of high rises the 2.4GHz band is a bit congested. So there another band will work much better.
          In that regard I fully agree with @nagelc to pray to your deity of choice for HopeRF to start integrating an MCU with the RFM, or Nordic to start exploring a different part of the ether.
          I have not set foot in the 'large' part of the MCU spectrum, but I have a Feather M0 in the house which will be the center of my new experiments.

          NeverDieN Nca78N 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • D DavidZH

            I certainly can see the appeal for the NRF5 series, which wil work perfect in areas with detached and terraced houses. But in Urban areas with lots of high rises the 2.4GHz band is a bit congested. So there another band will work much better.
            In that regard I fully agree with @nagelc to pray to your deity of choice for HopeRF to start integrating an MCU with the RFM, or Nordic to start exploring a different part of the ether.
            I have not set foot in the 'large' part of the MCU spectrum, but I have a Feather M0 in the house which will be the center of my new experiments.

            NeverDieN Offline
            NeverDieN Offline
            NeverDie
            Hero Member
            wrote on last edited by NeverDie
            #7

            @davidzh said in Is ARM the future of MySensors?:

            to pray to your deity of choice for HopeRF to start integrating an MCU with the RFM

            Even doing that doesn't give you all the benefits that tighter integration onto one chip gives you. For instance, on the nRF5:

            1. You don't communicate over SPI. Instead, the radio can share pointers directly to memory using easyDMA. Much faster, which translates also to lower power consumption.
            2. You can manage the radio and do other tasks (albeit in a limited way) while the MCU sleeps using the Programmable peripheral interconnect (PPI). This is maybe something that's hard to appreciate until you've tried it, but I'm sold on it and would sorely miss it if forced to return to a non-integrated MCU and radio, even if they were co-located together on the same module.
            1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • D DavidZH

              I certainly can see the appeal for the NRF5 series, which wil work perfect in areas with detached and terraced houses. But in Urban areas with lots of high rises the 2.4GHz band is a bit congested. So there another band will work much better.
              In that regard I fully agree with @nagelc to pray to your deity of choice for HopeRF to start integrating an MCU with the RFM, or Nordic to start exploring a different part of the ether.
              I have not set foot in the 'large' part of the MCU spectrum, but I have a Feather M0 in the house which will be the center of my new experiments.

              Nca78N Offline
              Nca78N Offline
              Nca78
              Hardware Contributor
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              @davidzh said in Is ARM the future of MySensors?:

              But in Urban areas with lots of high rises the 2.4GHz band is a bit congested.

              That's my case , there are 350 appartments in my building alone and my nrf24 network runs well, while my old 433MHz system regularly miss messages, that's why it will soon be replaced.

              NeverDieN D 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • Nca78N Nca78

                @davidzh said in Is ARM the future of MySensors?:

                But in Urban areas with lots of high rises the 2.4GHz band is a bit congested.

                That's my case , there are 350 appartments in my building alone and my nrf24 network runs well, while my old 433MHz system regularly miss messages, that's why it will soon be replaced.

                NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDie
                Hero Member
                wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                #9

                @nca78 said in Is ARM the future of MySensors?:

                @davidzh said in Is ARM the future of MySensors?:

                But in Urban areas with lots of high rises the 2.4GHz band is a bit congested.

                That's my case , there are 350 appartments in my building alone and my nrf24 network runs well, while my old 433MHz system regularly miss messages, that's why it will soon be replaced.

                LoRa isn't as much affected by interference since it's spread spectrum.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • alowhumA Offline
                  alowhumA Offline
                  alowhum
                  Plugin Developer
                  wrote on last edited by alowhum
                  #10

                  So is anyone thinking they will use the encryption features on a normal Arduino? Or is it, as I was thinking, that if you want to use encryption you'll have to upgrade?

                  AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gohanG Offline
                    gohanG Offline
                    gohan
                    Mod
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Simple encryption runs fine since it is mainly done by the radio chip

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • alowhumA alowhum

                      So is anyone thinking they will use the encryption features on a normal Arduino? Or is it, as I was thinking, that if you want to use encryption you'll have to upgrade?

                      AnticimexA Offline
                      AnticimexA Offline
                      Anticimex
                      Contest Winner
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      @alowhum if you only enable encryption (not signing) you can fit more into an atmga328p. Also, if you use a rfm69 radio, encryption is hw backed, so it require less flash space (thus potentially allow you to also fit signing).
                      Furthermore, using a atsha204a means signing also take less of flash since some of the algorithms are hw backed.

                      Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • NeverDieN Offline
                        NeverDieN Offline
                        NeverDie
                        Hero Member
                        wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                        #13

                        Well, regarding the OP, I think I read somewhere that development would largely move to ARM, and that at some point it would stop on the atmega. Not sure that I'm recalling it correctly though. Is it true?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • alowhumA Offline
                          alowhumA Offline
                          alowhum
                          Plugin Developer
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          @anticimex: interesting.

                          This is my use case: all I want is that I put a password at the top of all my arduino files, and then my neighbours won't be able to receive my data because they don't have the password. That's encryption, right? At the moment anyone can pick up the values that my sensors are sending out into the city. And that's kinda creepy.

                          gohanG AnticimexA 3 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • alowhumA alowhum

                            @anticimex: interesting.

                            This is my use case: all I want is that I put a password at the top of all my arduino files, and then my neighbours won't be able to receive my data because they don't have the password. That's encryption, right? At the moment anyone can pick up the values that my sensors are sending out into the city. And that's kinda creepy.

                            gohanG Offline
                            gohanG Offline
                            gohan
                            Mod
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            @alowhum I bet there are hundreds of people interested in your house temperature :sweat_smile:
                            Btw, yes that is encryption

                            alowhumA 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • alowhumA alowhum

                              @anticimex: interesting.

                              This is my use case: all I want is that I put a password at the top of all my arduino files, and then my neighbours won't be able to receive my data because they don't have the password. That's encryption, right? At the moment anyone can pick up the values that my sensors are sending out into the city. And that's kinda creepy.

                              AnticimexA Offline
                              AnticimexA Offline
                              Anticimex
                              Contest Winner
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              @alowhum the simple password option is the simplest way of enabling security. At the same time it is the most expensive as it does not require personalization and therefore is pure software based (except for rfm69 encryption). So you need to trade simplicity for code size.
                              That said, once you have figured out personalization (and there is plenty documentation on the matter) it can easily be repeated, as long as you keep the sketch used to program the personalization data.

                              Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                              alowhumA 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • alowhumA alowhum

                                @anticimex: interesting.

                                This is my use case: all I want is that I put a password at the top of all my arduino files, and then my neighbours won't be able to receive my data because they don't have the password. That's encryption, right? At the moment anyone can pick up the values that my sensors are sending out into the city. And that's kinda creepy.

                                AnticimexA Offline
                                AnticimexA Offline
                                Anticimex
                                Contest Winner
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                @alowhum also, the simple password option enable both signing and encryption so it takes up a lot of memory. If encryption is the only thing you want, just personalize the devices with an AES key and enable encryption only. It is not that good (fixed iv) and easily crackable by someone who has an idea about AES but it at least obfuscate your messages fairly well. Combined with signing it is better, but, again, that costs memory.

                                Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • AnticimexA Anticimex

                                  @alowhum the simple password option is the simplest way of enabling security. At the same time it is the most expensive as it does not require personalization and therefore is pure software based (except for rfm69 encryption). So you need to trade simplicity for code size.
                                  That said, once you have figured out personalization (and there is plenty documentation on the matter) it can easily be repeated, as long as you keep the sketch used to program the personalization data.

                                  alowhumA Offline
                                  alowhumA Offline
                                  alowhum
                                  Plugin Developer
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  @anticimex Hmm, I didn't realise that. Could it be an idea to create a MY_ENCRYPTION_SIMPLE_PASSWD feature as well, without the signing? Would that fit the "opportunistic curious neighbour" scenario?

                                  AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • alowhumA alowhum

                                    @anticimex Hmm, I didn't realise that. Could it be an idea to create a MY_ENCRYPTION_SIMPLE_PASSWD feature as well, without the signing? Would that fit the "opportunistic curious neighbour" scenario?

                                    AnticimexA Offline
                                    AnticimexA Offline
                                    Anticimex
                                    Contest Winner
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    @alowhum give personalization a shot. Since you use the simple flag, you are already on the development branch, so you have a simplified personalization flow. It is documented in doxygen (see the pinned signing post for a link)

                                    Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • gohanG gohan

                                      @alowhum I bet there are hundreds of people interested in your house temperature :sweat_smile:
                                      Btw, yes that is encryption

                                      alowhumA Offline
                                      alowhumA Offline
                                      alowhum
                                      Plugin Developer
                                      wrote on last edited by alowhum
                                      #20

                                      @gohan said in Is ARM the future of MySensors?:

                                      @alowhum I bet there are hundreds of people interested in your house temperature :sweat_smile:
                                      Btw, yes that is encryption

                                      Actually, just my temperature would already indicate

                                      • Whether I am home or not. "He'll never know we took the jewelry".
                                      • if I go on holidays a lot. "How is he paying for all that".
                                      • Whether I am feeling ill (set it a bit higher). "Got a fever last week? Or did your grandma visit"?
                                      • If I am environmentally conscious. Something I don't want to talk about at the neighbourhood BBQ..
                                      • Etc.

                                      Now add to that my other sensors.
                                      Now add to that all the actuators (yikes!).

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • NeverDieN Offline
                                        NeverDieN Offline
                                        NeverDie
                                        Hero Member
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        Don't your neighbors have better things to do?

                                        gohanG 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • NeverDieN NeverDie

                                          Don't your neighbors have better things to do?

                                          gohanG Offline
                                          gohanG Offline
                                          gohan
                                          Mod
                                          wrote on last edited by gohan
                                          #22

                                          @neverdie I was about to say the same... it must be a very boring town :D

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          30

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.1k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular