Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you may not be able to execute some actions.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

Rs_485 change pins

Robert last edited by

Hello.
Is it possible to change the default pins 8 and 9 on rs_485? I need to change them on 10 and 11
Reply Quote 0
1 Reply Last reply
mfalkvidd Mod last edited by @Robert

@robert MySensors uses AltSoftSerial which does not support changing pins.

It might be possibe by using SoftwareSerial and defining MY_RS485_HWSERIAL to use the SoftwareSerial instance.
Reply Quote 0
1 Reply Last reply

Robert

It might be possibe by using SoftwareSerial and defining MY_RS485_HWSERIAL to use the SoftwareSerial instance.``````
Insert Code Here

Its too hard to me.
Thanks for help.

pjr last edited by

Would this help? https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/6502/how-to-use-softwareserial-library
Reply Quote 1
1 Reply Last reply

4
Posts

779
Views

Log in to reply

Suggested Topics

Running out of ground pins
General Discussion • • Osch

3

0
Votes

3
Posts

1233
Views

@Osch Kind of hard to splice small gauge wires without soldering or terminals. A step towards wire splicing without soldering is to buy a wire stripper suitable for small ~20-28 gauge wires like this: • Small wire nuts (probably the purple ones for 20-28 gauge or so). Requires wire stripper. Just cut jumper wires in half, strip, and twist up 3 or more for more grounds. Wire nuts make excellent connections, maybe use electrical tape to wrap them if there is any concern of tugging on the wires. • No-strip insulation-displacement connectors aren't likely to work with the tiny stranded wire in your jumpers. • Crimp splice connectors like used for telephone wire splices might work but then you need a decent crimper, although a pliers may do. May be too big for smaller wires. • Screw terminal blocks can work well for wiring to sensors if you have a place to anchor the block. Tim
Using only two digital pins for a button? (no GND, no VCC)
General Discussion • • alowhum

7

0
Votes

7
Posts

678
Views

@zboblamont It's not very wasteful if you're not using them for anything else anyway. I'd rather use some extra code than extra hardware.
Can I run radio without IRQ on PIN 2? Or have an interrupt on other pins than 2 & 3 ?
General Discussion • • rvendrame

8

0
Votes

8
Posts

3552
Views

Ive designed a NRF based mysensor remote with 14 keys, I want to use pin 2 for one of the key. Currently all pin work properly for key but pin 2 does not recognise instead it creates some disturbance in transmission. what i receive on destination node is unexpected. Is it possible to disable use of pin 2 . it looks like mysenso uses pin 2 for some internal use.
SPI conflict: nRF24L01+ wants the same pins as my MAX7219 LED dot matrix display
General Discussion • • รอเรือ

3

0
Votes

3
Posts

36
Views

@mfalkvidd Thanks a lot! I just made some tests and it looks promising.
Code Garage to the rescue.
General Discussion • • skywatch

18

1
Votes

18
Posts

215
Views

it is up and running
Pjon Script
General Discussion • • sindrome73

6

0
Votes

6
Posts

38
Views

@nagelc I'm thinking about making some kind of shelves with PJON built in. The shelves will have a wireless charger and with PJON I can communicate "Wireless". So on that shelf I can put some things like small candles, maybe a modified humidifier. Things like that xd
CHATGPT My new best friend!
General Discussion • • Tmaster

5

3
Votes

5
Posts

22
Views

@Tmaster I think it writes better code than a lot of code I've seen, and the documentation is a lot better. The latter, of course, is because most coders don't document. some key elements: good statement of work -- Purpose of the Code is key (did you write that? Good job!). This will guide the AI to write what you want. descriptive variables good documentation code is independent of reading sensors up-to-down/down-to-up I spent a couple hours analyzing, researching and writing and re-writing this and all I can say is that the AI didn't catch is, as far as I can see, if your sensors are too far apart or your magnet is too weak, you could get false readings. You, being the author of AI directive, are responsible for for the code. The AI is just a tool. I started my coding with assembly language, though at that time we still had to enter the binary on some machines (set 16 switches, then press commit). ForTran and COBOL were the first real high level languages and subsequent languages, pascal, c, java, etc. were improvements. AI is a quantum step. It's still coding, but you have to learn how to talk to the AI to get what you want. Good project! Let us know how it turns out and if you had to tweak the code. -OSD

51
Online

11.7k
Users

11.2k
Topics

113.0k
Posts

Copyright 2019 TBD | Forum Guidelines | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

1 / 1