Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. ESP8266 gateway and sensor node not talking - noobie

ESP8266 gateway and sensor node not talking - noobie

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
megadht11esp8266
37 Posts 6 Posters 16.9k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • hekH Offline
    hekH Offline
    hek
    Admin
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Na... just have to wait for the china slow boat. Should be here before christmas :zzz:

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      Fabien
      wrote on last edited by
      #14

      I have same bug : http://forum.mysensors.org/topic/2538/esp8266-and-rfm69w-loop-reboot

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • hekH Offline
        hekH Offline
        hek
        Admin
        wrote on last edited by
        #15

        Are you getting the same error in dev branch?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          Fabien
          wrote on last edited by
          #16

          With the last git developpement it works. except when a node start presentation, gateway reboot. And sometimes it reboots randomless.
          node is a sensebender with MySensors 1.6 and gateway with 1.6 too.
          Important : You have to define MY_RF69_IRQ_NUM = MY_RF26_IRQ_PIN on ESP8266

          #define MY_RADIO_RFM69
          #define MY_RFM69_FREQUENCY   RF69_868MHZ
          #define MY_RF69_IRQ_PIN 15
          #define MY_RF69_SPI_CS 2
          #define MY_RF69_IRQ_NUM 15
          

          Result is

          connected with PandoraBox_1BB657, channel 1
          dhcp client start...
          .ip:192.168.2.165,mask:255.255.255.0,gw:192.168.2.1
          .IP: 192.168.2.165
          0;0;3;0;9;Init complete, id=0, parent=0, distance=0
          chg_B:-120
          
          Soft WDT reset
          
          ctx: cont 
          sp: 3ffef9a0 end: 3ffefc60 offset: 01b0
          
          >>>stack>>>
          3ffefb50:  00000001 3ffefd00 3ffeff68 00000001  
          3ffefb60:  00000024 3ffefd00 3ffeff68 402022f2  
          3ffefb70:  3ffe8496 00000000 3ffefd00 40202378  
          3ffefb80:  3ffe8496 00000000 3ffefd00 40202563  
          3ffefb90:  3ffefd1e 00000001 3ffefd00 40202a43  
          3ffefba0:  3fffdc20 00000000 3ffeec28 3ffefcd8  
          3ffefbb0:  3fffdc20 3ffefd1d 3ffefd00 40202e0c  
          3ffefbc0:  40209c8d 00000000 3ffeec28 40203ed1  
          3ffefbd0:  00000000 00000002 3ffefe58 402039d0  
          3ffefbe0:  00000000 3ffefd00 3ffeff68 40202338  
          3ffefbf0:  40101500 402059d6 3ffeff50 3ffefc20  
          3ffefc00:  3ffefc10 00000004 3ffefcf9 40202358  
          3ffefc10:  3fffdc20 00000000 00000000 3ffeec30  
          3ffefc20:  3fffdc20 00000000 3ffeec28 3ffeec30  
          3ffefc30:  3fffdc20 00000000 3ffeec28 40203aee  
          3ffefc40:  00000000 00000000 3ffeec28 402041a0  
          3ffefc50:  00000000 00000000 3ffeec40 40100114  
          <<<stack<<<
          �!�L�<1���0;0;3;0;9;Starting gateway (RRNGE-, 1.6.0-beta)
          0;0;3;0;9;Radio init successful.
          scandone
          state: 0 -> 2 (b0)
          .state: 2 -> 3 (0)
          state: 3 -> 5 (10)
          add 0
          aid 3
          pm open phy_2,type:2 0 0
          cnt 
          chg_B:-60
          
          connected with PandoraBox_1BB657, channel 1
          dhcp client start...
          .ip:192.168.2.165,mask:255.255.255.0,gw:192.168.2.1
          .IP: 192.168.2.165
          0;0;3;0;9;Init complete, id=0, parent=0, distance=0
          chg_B:-120
          0;0;3;0;9;read: 1-1-0 s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:24.6
          0;0;3;0;9;read: 1-1-0 s=2,c=1,t=1,pt=2,l=2,sg=0:51
          0;0;3;0;9;read: 1-1-0 s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:24.4
          

          And something strange, I only recieve Humidity one time. (sensebender defaut sketch with FORCE_TRANSMIT_INTERVAL 0 )

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            Fabien
            wrote on last edited by Fabien
            #17

            @hek you are right it works fine with

            #define TIME_OUT 500
            

            in https://github.com/mysensors/Arduino/blob/development/libraries/MySensors/drivers/RFM69/RFM69.cpp#L47

            0�~?�4�!�{�OAa�0;0;3;0;9;Starting gateway (RRNGE-, 1.6.0-beta)
            0;0;3;0;9;Radio init successful.
            scandone
            state: 0 -> 2 (b0)
            .state: 2 -> 3 (0)
            state: 3 -> 5 (10)
            add 0
            aid 3
            pm open phy_2,type:2 0 0
            cnt 
            chg_B:-60
            
            connected with PandoraBox_1BB657, channel 1
            dhcp client start...
            .ip:192.168.2.165,mask:255.255.255.0,gw:192.168.2.1
            .IP: 192.168.2.165
            0;0;3;0;9;Init complete, id=0, parent=0, distance=0
            chg_B:-120
            0;0;3;0;9;read: 1-1-0 s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:24.8
            0;0;3;0;9;read: 1-1-0 s=2,c=1,t=1,pt=2,l=2,sg=0:54
            0;0;3;0;9;read: 1-1-0 s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=10,sg=0:1.6.0-beta
            0;0;3;0;9;read: 1-1-0 s=255,c=4,t=0,pt=6,l=10,sg=0:FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF0300
            0;0;3;0;9;read: 1-1-0 s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=17,sg=0:Sensebender Micro
            0;0;3;0;9;read: 1-1-0 s=255,c=3,t=12,pt=0,l=3,sg=0:1.4
            0;0;3;0;9;read: 1-1-0 s=2,c=0,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
            0;0;3;0;9;read: 1-1-0 s=2,c=1,t=1,pt=2,l=2,sg=0:54
            0;0;3;0;9;read: 1-1-0 s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:24.7
            0;0;3;0;9;read: 1-1-0 s=2,c=1,t=1,pt=2,l=2,sg=0:50
            0;0;3;0;9;read: 1-1-0 s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:24.7
            0;0;3;0;9;read: 1-1-0 s=2,c=1,t=1,pt=2,l=2,sg=0:51
            0;0;3;0;9;Client 0 connected
            0;0;3;0;9;read: 1-1-0 s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:24.5
            0;0;3;0;9;read: 1-1-0 s=2,c=1,t=1,pt=2,l=2,sg=0:50
            

            I don't try with other timeout values.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • hekH Offline
              hekH Offline
              hek
              Admin
              wrote on last edited by
              #18

              Ok, great. We need to increase timeout then.

              YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                Fabien
                wrote on last edited by
                #19

                @hek Yes and perhaps a feature to set MY_RF69_IRQ_NUM = MY_RF26_IRQ_PIN when using ESP8266. Do You want to test other timeout values ? Is it critical ?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • hekH Offline
                  hekH Offline
                  hek
                  Admin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #20

                  @Fabien said:

                  MY_RF26_IRQ_PIN

                  I cannot find this defined anywhere...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    Fabien
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #21

                    sorry MY_RF69_IRQ_PIN ...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      Fabien
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #22

                      Work with 51ms timeout with my config. I set 60ms to be "secure"

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • hekH hek

                        Ok, great. We need to increase timeout then.

                        YveauxY Offline
                        YveauxY Offline
                        Yveaux
                        Mod
                        wrote on last edited by Yveaux
                        #23

                        @hek said:

                        Ok, great. We need to increase timeout then.

                        Better add a yield() call in those blocking wait loops.
                        When quiclkly looking over the code of the RF69 driver, the RFM69::initialize call could in theory block for 1.5 sec...
                        That's a watchdog reset waiting to happen!

                        http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • hekH Offline
                          hekH Offline
                          hek
                          Admin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #24

                          Yep,

                          https://github.com/mysensors/Arduino/pull/287

                          YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • hekH hek

                            Yep,

                            https://github.com/mysensors/Arduino/pull/287

                            YveauxY Offline
                            YveauxY Offline
                            Yveaux
                            Mod
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #25

                            @hek :+1:

                            http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mersing
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #26

                              This is working great !

                              Tx for this !

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • chrilleC Offline
                                chrilleC Offline
                                chrille
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #27

                                I am seeing something similar with RFM69 (specifically RFM69CW) and ESP8266. I have build an ESP8266 gateway based on the GatewayESP8266 sketch and this is what I changed

                                #define MY_RADIO_RFM69
                                #define MY_GATEWAY_ESP8266
                                #define MY_RFM69_FREQUENCY   RF69_868MHZ
                                #define MY_RF69_IRQ_PIN 4
                                #define MY_RF69_SPI_CS 15
                                #define MY_RF69_IRQ_NUM 4
                                

                                I build a sensor node with the DallasTemperatureSensor sketch on an Arduino Mini Pro and defined

                                #define MY_RADIO_RFM69
                                #define MY_RFM69_FREQUENCY   RF69_868MHZ
                                

                                When I start up the gateway I see

                                0;255;3;0;9;Starting gateway (RRNGE-, 2.0.0-beta)
                                0;255;3;0;9;Radio init successful.
                                ....scandone
                                state: 0 -> 2 (b0)
                                state: 2 -> 3 (0)
                                state: 3 -> 5 (10)
                                add 0
                                aid 8
                                cnt
                                
                                connected with AP, channel 1
                                ip:62.x.x.x,mask:255.255.255.128,gw:62.x.x.x
                                .IP: 62.x.x.x
                                0;255;3;0;9;Init complete, id=0, parent=0, distance=0
                                

                                So far so good - I assume all the radio wiring is OK, since the radio init is successful

                                On the sensor node I see

                                Starting sensor (RRNNA-, 2.0.0-beta)
                                Radio init successful.
                                find parent 
                                send: 255-255-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,st=bc:
                                find parent
                                send: 255-255-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,st=bc:
                                find parent
                                send: 255-255-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,st=bc:
                                Init complete, id=255, parent=255, distance=255
                                

                                As soon as the sensor node is started the ESP8266 crashes with a WDT reset

                                Soft WDT reset
                                
                                ctx: cont
                                sp: 3ffef370 end: 3ffef630 offset: 01b0
                                
                                >>>stack>>>
                                3ffef520:  00000001 3ffef6d4 3ffef964 00000000
                                3ffef530:  00000024 3ffef6d4 3ffef964 40202436
                                3ffef540:  3ffe8432 00000000 3ffef6d4 402024bc
                                3ffef550:  3ffe8432 00000000 3ffef6d4 402026a7
                                3ffef560:  3ffef6f2 00000001 3ffef6d4 40202b87
                                3ffef570:  3fffdae0 00000000 3ffee600 3ffef6ac
                                3ffef580:  3fffdae0 3ffef6f1 3ffef6d4 40202cf4
                                3ffef590:  3fff1210 00000000 3ffee600 402042b4
                                3ffef5a0:  00000000 00000002 3ffef82c 40203d20
                                3ffef5b0:  00000000 3ffef6d4 3ffef964 4020247c
                                3ffef5c0:  401057ff 00000400 00000103 3ffef5f0
                                3ffef5d0:  3ffef5e0 00000004 3ffef6cd 4020249c
                                3ffef5e0:  3ffe8920 00000000 00000000 3ffee608
                                3ffef5f0:  3fffdae0 00000000 3ffee600 3ffee608
                                3ffef600:  3fffdae0 00000000 3ffee600 40203e6c
                                3ffef610:  feefeffe feefeffe 3ffee600 402045b4
                                3ffef620:  feefeffe feefeffe 3ffee610 40100114
                                <<<stack<<<
                                

                                The libraries are 2.0 beta as from a few days ago. I consider the power to the ESP8266 to be OK, since I use the same for en NRF24 based gateway and also for several other ESP modules.

                                From the thread I understand that known issues should be fixed in the current beta. Any ideas on how to move on?

                                YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • chrilleC chrille

                                  I am seeing something similar with RFM69 (specifically RFM69CW) and ESP8266. I have build an ESP8266 gateway based on the GatewayESP8266 sketch and this is what I changed

                                  #define MY_RADIO_RFM69
                                  #define MY_GATEWAY_ESP8266
                                  #define MY_RFM69_FREQUENCY   RF69_868MHZ
                                  #define MY_RF69_IRQ_PIN 4
                                  #define MY_RF69_SPI_CS 15
                                  #define MY_RF69_IRQ_NUM 4
                                  

                                  I build a sensor node with the DallasTemperatureSensor sketch on an Arduino Mini Pro and defined

                                  #define MY_RADIO_RFM69
                                  #define MY_RFM69_FREQUENCY   RF69_868MHZ
                                  

                                  When I start up the gateway I see

                                  0;255;3;0;9;Starting gateway (RRNGE-, 2.0.0-beta)
                                  0;255;3;0;9;Radio init successful.
                                  ....scandone
                                  state: 0 -> 2 (b0)
                                  state: 2 -> 3 (0)
                                  state: 3 -> 5 (10)
                                  add 0
                                  aid 8
                                  cnt
                                  
                                  connected with AP, channel 1
                                  ip:62.x.x.x,mask:255.255.255.128,gw:62.x.x.x
                                  .IP: 62.x.x.x
                                  0;255;3;0;9;Init complete, id=0, parent=0, distance=0
                                  

                                  So far so good - I assume all the radio wiring is OK, since the radio init is successful

                                  On the sensor node I see

                                  Starting sensor (RRNNA-, 2.0.0-beta)
                                  Radio init successful.
                                  find parent 
                                  send: 255-255-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,st=bc:
                                  find parent
                                  send: 255-255-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,st=bc:
                                  find parent
                                  send: 255-255-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,st=bc:
                                  Init complete, id=255, parent=255, distance=255
                                  

                                  As soon as the sensor node is started the ESP8266 crashes with a WDT reset

                                  Soft WDT reset
                                  
                                  ctx: cont
                                  sp: 3ffef370 end: 3ffef630 offset: 01b0
                                  
                                  >>>stack>>>
                                  3ffef520:  00000001 3ffef6d4 3ffef964 00000000
                                  3ffef530:  00000024 3ffef6d4 3ffef964 40202436
                                  3ffef540:  3ffe8432 00000000 3ffef6d4 402024bc
                                  3ffef550:  3ffe8432 00000000 3ffef6d4 402026a7
                                  3ffef560:  3ffef6f2 00000001 3ffef6d4 40202b87
                                  3ffef570:  3fffdae0 00000000 3ffee600 3ffef6ac
                                  3ffef580:  3fffdae0 3ffef6f1 3ffef6d4 40202cf4
                                  3ffef590:  3fff1210 00000000 3ffee600 402042b4
                                  3ffef5a0:  00000000 00000002 3ffef82c 40203d20
                                  3ffef5b0:  00000000 3ffef6d4 3ffef964 4020247c
                                  3ffef5c0:  401057ff 00000400 00000103 3ffef5f0
                                  3ffef5d0:  3ffef5e0 00000004 3ffef6cd 4020249c
                                  3ffef5e0:  3ffe8920 00000000 00000000 3ffee608
                                  3ffef5f0:  3fffdae0 00000000 3ffee600 3ffee608
                                  3ffef600:  3fffdae0 00000000 3ffee600 40203e6c
                                  3ffef610:  feefeffe feefeffe 3ffee600 402045b4
                                  3ffef620:  feefeffe feefeffe 3ffee610 40100114
                                  <<<stack<<<
                                  

                                  The libraries are 2.0 beta as from a few days ago. I consider the power to the ESP8266 to be OK, since I use the same for en NRF24 based gateway and also for several other ESP modules.

                                  From the thread I understand that known issues should be fixed in the current beta. Any ideas on how to move on?

                                  YveauxY Offline
                                  YveauxY Offline
                                  Yveaux
                                  Mod
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #28

                                  @chrille Try adding the following line to your setup() function:

                                  ESP.wdtDisable();
                                  

                                  It should disable the (software) watchdog on ESP. See if it continues, or if it will now just hang.

                                  http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                                  chrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • YveauxY Yveaux

                                    @chrille Try adding the following line to your setup() function:

                                    ESP.wdtDisable();
                                    

                                    It should disable the (software) watchdog on ESP. See if it continues, or if it will now just hang.

                                    chrilleC Offline
                                    chrilleC Offline
                                    chrille
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #29

                                    @Yveaux Just tried that. The change removed the watchdog message and the stack trace, but the module still reboots

                                    chrilleC YveauxY 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • chrilleC chrille

                                      @Yveaux Just tried that. The change removed the watchdog message and the stack trace, but the module still reboots

                                      chrilleC Offline
                                      chrilleC Offline
                                      chrille
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #30

                                      ...I also tried to change TIME_OUT in rfm69.cpp to 500 as suggested by Fabien. Doesn't make any difference

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • chrilleC chrille

                                        @Yveaux Just tried that. The change removed the watchdog message and the stack trace, but the module still reboots

                                        YveauxY Offline
                                        YveauxY Offline
                                        Yveaux
                                        Mod
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #31

                                        @chrille said:

                                        the module still reboots

                                        Probably the hardware watchdog kicks in then...

                                        http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                                        chrilleC 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • YveauxY Yveaux

                                          @chrille said:

                                          the module still reboots

                                          Probably the hardware watchdog kicks in then...

                                          chrilleC Offline
                                          chrilleC Offline
                                          chrille
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #32

                                          @Yveaux I did some further tests and it may be related to the inclusion mode feature. At least disabling this makes things more stable - but I still haven't got the radio side working reliable. When this is working I will go back to the gateway and see if I can find out what triggers the crash

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          28

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.1k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular