MySensors 2.0.0 Released

[gloob]

Is there an overview about what was changed since the latest 1.x version?

Edit:
Sorry, did not see the link.

[Lior Rubin]

Hi, when I'm try to upload the sketch GatewayESP8266 I got the following error:

In file included from /Users/liorrubin/Documents/Arduino/libraries/MySensors-2.0.0/MySensors.h:299:0,
                 from /var/folders/l0/kxrb9wmd6rj651nw4gld5nx00000gn/T/arduino_modified_sketch_982538/GatewayESP8266.ino:137:
/Users/liorrubin/Documents/Arduino/libraries/MySensors-2.0.0/core/MyMainESP8266.cpp:4:10: error: #include expects "FILENAME" or <FILENAME>
 #include “Schedule.h”
          ^
In file included from /Users/liorrubin/Documents/Arduino/libraries/MySensors-2.0.0/MySensors.h:299:0,
                 from /var/folders/l0/kxrb9wmd6rj651nw4gld5nx00000gn/T/arduino_modified_sketch_982538/GatewayESP8266.ino:137:
/Users/liorrubin/Documents/Arduino/libraries/MySensors-2.0.0/core/MyMainESP8266.cpp:13:26: fatal error: core_version.h: No such file or directory
 #include <core_version.h>
                          ^
compilation terminated.
exit status 1
Error compiling for board NodeMCU 1.0 (ESP-12E Module).

Even when i try to comment the "Include Schedule.h" then i got an error about the "core_version.h" file.

anyone ?

[Nca78]

Wow, that is great news, like christmas in June :gift::christmas_tree::gift:
Thank you to all the team for all the hard work, MySensors is evolving at a whole new level now, the changelog speaks for itself !
I hope I will improve my level fast enough to be able to contribute to one of the future versions, but it feels a bit out of touch for me at the moment :D

[tekka]

@Lior-Rubin Update esp8266 boards to the most recent version (2.3.0)

[ErrK]

This is great news!
Thank you for all the work.

[drock1985]

Thanks MySensors team. Can't wait to see what 2.0 will bring!

[nielsokker]

I've just tried it and it look really great!

When is the documentation comming? I'm having some trouble understanding the errors i get in the log. It says: !TSM:CHKID:FAIL (ID=255)
!TSM:FAILURE
TSM:PDT

Anyone has an idea?

Thanks in advance!

[corbin]

Great work, thank you!

[rollercontainer]

Thank you to all contributors for this fine piece of software!

Cheers!

[tekka]

@nielsokker documentation about the log messages is WIP and will follow soon.

In brief:
TSM refers to the transport state machine, (!) to an error.
Your error !TSM:CHKID:FAIL indicates that the node didn't receive a (valid) ID, hence !TSM:FAILURE (transport not operational) followed by TSM:PDT which means that the radio was powered-down for a while followed by a re-initialisation.

[Matt]

BOOM! Well done guys =)

[sincze]

excellent. let me try to find the updates and see what advantages are in it for me.
great job guys.

[gyro]

I have been using rf24 radios before mysensors, and back then everything didn't worked so good as with mysensors.

Awesome work, I think it's time for a donation at least for some 🍻 for holidays for developers. They deserve it.

[nielsokker]

@tekka

Thank you for your answer! Does this mean that the hardware is failing? I used the repeater example.

[tekka]

@nielsokker no, it means that the node was requesting and ID from the controller but didn't get one.

[Lars65]

What am I doing wrong when I get this when I try to compile?
I have a new installation of Arduino IDE 1.6.5 (have tried 1.6.7 also, and still the same)and I have put the new files in my arduino sketchbook also deleted all old ones)

Arduino:1.6.5 (Windows 8.1), Kort:"Arduino Nano, ATmega328"

DustSensor.ino:49:25: fatal error: MySensors.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
Fel vid kompilering.

This report would have more information with
"Show verbose output during compilation"
enabled in File > Preferences.

[nielsokker]

@Lars65

I had the same error. You have to(instead of what the 1.5 manual says) keep all the files in the mysensors_master folder. This folder needs to be in the libraries folder that already exists.

[Lars65]

Thank you!!!!!
That helped a lot.

:)

[CrankyCoder]

Guess it's a good thing I am just getting started. I am guessing 2.0 should be the default go to now?

[drock1985]

@Jason-Brunk

IMHO I would say yes. Keep in mind there are some differences in how the API works. I suggest going through the example scripts from 2.0, and compare that to the ones in 1.5 so you will get an idea of what I mean.