Hello!

The topic of powering MySensors nodes with solar energy interests me and I have been looking for solutions lately to do so.

I have found an awesome energy harvesting chip with a lot of features to create hassle-free solar-powered devices. It's called the AEM10941 by e-peas.

What is really great with this chip is that it takes a solar cell as input, charges a battery / supercapacitor and outputs two stable selectable voltages. So it does energy harvesting & boost / buck converter.
Moreover, if the sun isn't shining for a long period of time, you can also add a "backup battery" that will be used when your rechargeable medium runs out of juice.

Jasper Sikken built a nice board during the Hackaday "energy harvesting" competition with this chip: https://hackaday.io/project/159139-tiny-solar-energy-module-tsem. As you can see, it requires very few components, which is great!

I plan to use this chip for my outdoor weather station that I am building with MySensors (I have a BME280 which measures temperature, humidity & pressure). I'll very probably build my own board with 2.54mm-spaced pins to manipulate it more easily!

Hello!

Thank you @TRS-80 and @zboblamont for your answers and sorry for the delay...

To answer your question @TRS-80, I'm actually trying to figure out what is the most robust way to use the MySensors library.
Most examples out there consider that all underlying layers (hardware, transmission...) will just work an the return value of sleep / send is never used.

I've found that if the send call fails due to missing hardware ACKs, the node ends up registering again. So, I was considering retrying sending data if send failed, but MySensors already retries sending the data a few times as @zboblamont says.

Regarding the sleep call, I'm now checking the return value and making sure that the return code is the interrupt, as specified by the API. Here is my new code:

// MySensors configuration
#define MY_SPLASH_SCREEN_DISABLED
#define MY_RADIO_RFM69
#define MY_RFM69_RST_PIN 8
#define MY_RFM69_NEW_DRIVER
#define MY_RFM69_ENABLE_ENCRYPTION 

// Include libraries
#include <MySensors.h>

// Global settings
#define BATT_ADC_PIN A1
#define CHILD_ID 0
#define SENSOR_PIN 3
#define SENSOR_INT digitalPinToInterrupt(SENSOR_PIN)

// Global variables
byte last_batt_level = 0;
unsigned long total_water = 0;
MyMessage water_msg(CHILD_ID, V_VOLUME);

// Check the battery voltage and eventually send it
void report_battery_level() {

    // Read the battery voltage
    long adc = analogRead(BATT_ADC_PIN);

    // Compute the battery level
    // Vmin = 1.6/(3.3/1023) = 496
    // Vmax = 3/(3.3/1023) = 930
    long level = (adc-496)*100/434;
    byte batt_level = constrain(level, 0, 100);
    
    // The battery level changed, send it
    if (batt_level != last_batt_level) {
        sendBatteryLevel(batt_level);        
        last_batt_level = batt_level;
    }
}

void presentation() { 
    sendSketchInfo("Water meter", "1.0");
    present(CHILD_ID, S_WATER);
}

void setup() {
    pinMode(BATT_ADC_PIN, INPUT);
    pinMode(SENSOR_PIN, INPUT);
}

void loop() {
  
    // Sleep until we get a FALLING signal
    byte interrupt = sleep(SENSOR_INT, FALLING, 0);

    // We were woken up by the sensor
    if (interrupt == SENSOR_INT) {

        // Send the new water volume to the gateway
        total_water++;
        send(water_msg.set(total_water));
    
        // Send the battery level every 150L
        if (total_water % 150 == 0) {
            report_battery_level();
        }
    }
}

I've had communication issues since I changed the code and the reported water consumption didn't skyrocket as previously, which is good.

To answer to @zboblamont, the FALLING interrupt is fine actually. The water volume is incremented "rather slowly", at most every 7s I'd say (if we open all taps :P).

I'll have to fix the communication problems and to do that I'll have to design proper PCBs. The sensors / gateway are on breadboards right now, which is surely suboptimal.

Cheers!

There is a "Where to buy" button at the top of the page I linked.

As you can see on, the page, they can be bought worldwide on the Fujitsu webshop for €4 per unit: https://shop.feeu.com/epages/es966226.sf/en_GB/?ObjectPath=/Shops/es966226/Products/AEM10941

You can also buy the "ready to use" board built and sold by Jasper Sikken on Tindie:

• The supercapaciors version: https://www.tindie.com/products/jaspersikken/solar-harvesting-into-supercapacitors/
• The lithium-ion version: https://www.tindie.com/products/jaspersikken/solar-harvesting-into-li-ion-battery/
  They are a bit expensive though (€22.60 each), that's why I'm considering building my own boards.

I've just found now that he has posted the schematics on GitHub, that's great:

• https://github.com/jrsikken/AEMSUCA
• https://github.com/jrsikken/AEMLION

Hello everyone!

First of all, thank you for building MySensors, it's really an awesome project!
I had been searching a few months ago for a low-cost (and DIY) alternative to Zigbee / ZWave / Enocean... I'm glad I found it!

This is my first post here ; I'm currently struggling to make encryption and signing work on a barebone ATMEGA328P, using the internal 8MHz clock.

First, a bit of context:
I am working on a project to control my heaters via MySensors and HomeAssistant.
Basically, the idea is to send a (part) of the mains signal to the heater so that it enters the right mode: Comfort, Eco, Frost protection or Off mode.

The circuit behind that is really simple to build: a 3.3V power adapter, two optotriacs, two diodes, a microcontroller, a few resistors and a radio basically.

On the gateway side, HomeAssistant is running on a Raspberry Pi 1 and I attached to that board an RFM69W radio in the "serial gateway" configuration.
It has been built with the right configuration options: encryption enabled, rmf69w radio defined, etc.
I also defined a random AES and HMAC key in the configuration file used by the gateway.

On the "actuator" side if I can say so, I first tested the setup I'm trying to build with an Arduino Uno, another RFM69W, the right level converter between the radio and the Arduino Uno, and finally the controlling circuit.
I followed the procedure to make signing work: run the SecurityPersonalizer sketch with the keys defined and then uploaded my pilot wire code.

This first prototype using the Arduino Uno worked well: I could see nonces being exchanged in the debug view of the gateway, the commands sent / received and the state changing on the Arduino side (thanks to diodes). I am now planning to make a second more "realistic" prototype.
My goal is to produce PCBs with the minimum number of components ; I'll therefore replace the Arduino Uno by an ATMEGA328P with the internal 8MHz clock, two capacitors between (A)Vin and GND, and a resistor near the "not RESET" pin.

An important note before talking about the issue: I bought the ATMEGAs directly from Microchip (RIP Atmel :P) and the RFM69W radios directly from HopeRF.
So, these are genuine components!

Now, the issue:
I uploaded the SecurityPersonalizer sketch to the ATMEGA328P, made sure it was executed correctly and then I pushed my "pilot wire" sketch.
For an unknown reason, the node fails to register and I can't see any message on the gateway side.
Here are the "actuator" logs:

 __  __       ____
|  \/  |_   _/ ___|  ___ _ __  ___  ___  _ __ ___
| |\/| | | | \___ \ / _ \ `_ \/ __|/ _ \| `__/ __|
| |  | | |_| |___| |  __/ | | \__ \  _  | |  \__ \
|_|  |_|\__, |____/ \___|_| |_|___/\___/|_|  |___/
        |___/                      2.3.1

16 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RPNNAS-X,REL=255,VER=2.3.1
63 TSM:INIT
63 TSF:WUR:MS=0
67 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
67 TSM:FPAR
75 TSF:MSG:SEND,255-255-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
2390 TSF:MSG:READ,51-180-176,s=199,c=3,t=129,pt=3,l=23,sg=1:0
2398 !TSF:MSG:LEN=7,EXP=32
2400 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
2402 TSM:FPAR
2410 TSF:MSG:SEND,255-255-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
4278 TSF:MSG:READ,51-180-176,s=199,c=3,t=129,pt=3,l=23,sg=1:0
4286 !TSF:MSG:LEN=7,EXP=32
4419 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
4421 TSM:FPAR
4427 TSF:MSG:SEND,255-255-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
6436 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
6438 TSM:FPAR
6445 TSF:MSG:SEND,255-255-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
8454 !TSM:FPAR:FAIL
8456 TSM:FAIL:CNT=1
8458 TSM:FAIL:DIS
8460 TSF:TDI:TSL
18462 TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
18464 TSM:INIT
18466 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
18468 TSM:FPAR
18477 TSF:MSG:SEND,255-255-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
20486 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
20488 TSM:FPAR
20494 TSF:MSG:SEND,255-255-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
22503 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
22505 TSM:FPAR
22511 TSF:MSG:SEND,255-255-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
24520 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
24522 TSM:FPAR
24528 TSF:MSG:SEND,255-255-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
26540 !TSM:FPAR:FAIL
26542 TSM:FAIL:CNT=2
26544 TSM:FAIL:DIS
26546 TSF:TDI:TSL
36550 TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
(etc)

When this problem appeared, I followed the pieces of advice given on this forum: I ran the "clear EEPROM" sketch, re-run the SecurityPersonalizer sketch and re-pushed my pilot wire sketch. Still no luck

I started to believe the problem could be at the hardware level.
I disabled encryption on the gateway (after rebuilding it) and in my sketch... and the actuator managed to register:

 __  __       ____
|  \/  |_   _/ ___|  ___ _ __  ___  ___  _ __ ___
| |\/| | | | \___ \ / _ \ `_ \/ __|/ _ \| `__/ __|
| |  | | |_| |___| |  __/ | | \__ \  _  | |  \__ \
|_|  |_|\__, |____/ \___|_| |_|___/\___/|_|  |___/
        |___/                      2.3.1

16 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RPNNA---,REL=255,VER=2.3.1
28 TSM:INIT
28 TSF:WUR:MS=0
30 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
32 TSM:FPAR
38 TSF:MSG:SEND,255-255-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
440 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-255,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:0
446 TSF:MSG:FPAR OK,ID=0,D=1
2048 TSM:FPAR:OK
2048 TSM:ID
2050 TSM:ID:REQ
2066 TSF:MSG:SEND,255-255-0-0,s=2,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
2574 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-255,s=2,c=3,t=4,pt=0,l=1,sg=0:1
2580 TSF:SID:OK,ID=1
2584 TSM:ID:OK
2584 TSM:UPL
2600 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
2820 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
2824 TSF:MSG:PONG RECV,HP=1
2828 TSM:UPL:OK
2830 TSM:READY:ID=1,PAR=0,DIS=1
2844 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0100
3055 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0100
3080 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=5,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:2.3.1
3602 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
3649 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=0,l=1,sg=0:M
3674 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=10,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:Fil pilote
4196 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=12,pt=0,l=3,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1.0
4229 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=0,t=4,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
4237 MCO:REG:REQ
4751 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:2
4968 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
4974 MCO:PIM:NODE REG=1
4978 MCO:BGN:STP
4978 MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
4995 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=1,t=2,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
5521 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=1,t=3,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:2
589813 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=0,c=1,t=3,pt=0,l=1,sg=0:6
599988 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=0,c=1,t=3,pt=0,l=1,sg=0:1
611840 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=0,c=1,t=3,pt=0,l=1,sg=0:3

I could of course see messages being received / send on the gateway side too.

To sum up
Communication is successfully working between an Arduino Uno and the Serial Gateway with encryption + signing enabled but fails to work on a barebone ATMEGA328P.

Here are a few questions / ideas I have regarding the issue:

• Could the problem be the bootloader I used to flash the ATMEGA328P? I used the " breadboard-1-6-x.zip" found on the official Arduino website: https://www.arduino.cc/en/Tutorial/ArduinoToBreadboard. Maybe the fuses / EEPROM address it set / uses conflicts with what the SecurityPersonalizer sketch does?
• It seems the encrypted packet is just ignored with encryption enabled since I can't see any logs on the gateway side. I was wondering: are the messages dropped at the radio level or at the software level?

Thanks in advance for your help!

Appendix -- Pilot wire code

#define MY_DEBUG

// MySensors configuration
#define MY_RADIO_RFM69
#define MY_RFM69_NEW_DRIVER
#define MY_SIGNING_SOFT
#define MY_SIGNING_SOFT_RANDOMSEED_PIN 7
#define MY_SIGNING_REQUEST_SIGNATURES
#define MY_RFM69_ENABLE_ENCRYPTION 

// Include the libraries
#include <MySensors.h>

// Global settings
#define CHILD_ID 0
#define INITIAL_MODE 2
#define MOC_P 3
#define MOC_N 4

// Global variables
bool first_msg_sent = false;
MyMessage status_msg(CHILD_ID, V_STATUS);
MyMessage mode_msg(CHILD_ID, V_PERCENTAGE);

void set_mode(int16_t mode) {
	digitalWrite(MOC_N, mode & 1);
	digitalWrite(MOC_P, mode & 2);
}

void presentation() { 
	sendSketchInfo("Fil pilote", "1.0");
	present(CHILD_ID, S_DIMMER);
}

void setup() {

	// Make the MOC pins outputs
	pinMode(MOC_P, OUTPUT);
	pinMode(MOC_N, OUTPUT);

	// Set the initial mode (2 = OFF)
	set_mode(INITIAL_MODE);
}

void loop() {
	if (!first_msg_sent) {
		send(status_msg.set((int16_t) 1));
		send(mode_msg.set((int16_t) INITIAL_MODE));
		first_msg_sent = true;
	}
}

void receive(const MyMessage &message) {
	if(message.type == V_PERCENTAGE) {
		set_mode(message.getInt());
	}
}

@Anticimex: I have just found that there is an EESAVE fuse on the ATMEGA328P which prevents the EEPROM from being erased whenever a new sketch is pushed to the microcontroller.

It seems to be the root cause of the issue since I've found references in other posts of the MySensors forum to that problem.

I'll test that now and let you know.

IT WORKS @Anticimex !!!

The issue was indeed the EESAVE fuse not set, which caused the EEPROM to be erased after each sketch upload.

Here is my modified boards.txt file:

##############################################################

atmega328bb.name=ATmega328 on a breadboard (8 MHz internal clock)

atmega328bb.upload.protocol=arduino
atmega328bb.upload.maximum_size=30720
atmega328bb.upload.speed=57600

atmega328bb.bootloader.low_fuses=0xE2
atmega328bb.bootloader.high_fuses=0xD2
atmega328bb.bootloader.extended_fuses=0x05

atmega328bb.bootloader.file=atmega/ATmegaBOOT_168_atmega328_pro_8MHz.hex
atmega328bb.bootloader.unlock_bits=0x3F
atmega328bb.bootloader.lock_bits=0x0F

atmega328bb.build.board=AVR_ATMEGA328BB
atmega328bb.build.mcu=atmega328p
atmega328bb.build.f_cpu=8000000L
atmega328bb.build.core=arduino:arduino
atmega328bb.build.variant=arduino:standard


atmega328bb.bootloader.tool=arduino:avrdude
atmega328bb.upload.tool=arduino:avrdude

So, basically, for people coming here in the future:
Follow the tutorial https://www.arduino.cc/en/Tutorial/ArduinoToBreadboard to flash the bootloader of your ATMEGA328P but replace the given boards.txt file (in the breadboard-1-6-x.zip archive) by the one above.

A useful link to calculate the fuses values: http://www.engbedded.com/fusecalc/

Thanks for your help @Anticimex, @mfalkvidd and @kimot

Hello everyone!

I am experiencing issues with my "pilot wire" node (controlling one of my heaters) since a few days.

At 8:00 a.m., the MySensors gateway is supposed to send a V_PERCENTAGE message to the heater with "0" as payload, so that it goes into comfort mode and starts heating.
At the opposite, at 10:00 p.m., a V_PERCENTAGE message with "3" as payload is sent to the heater so that it goes into "eco" mode.

All communications are encrypted on my MySensors network and the pilot wire node requires signed messages. Everything was correctly set up (after long discussions here ) and it has been working well for months.

However, I'm starting to get "!TSF:MSG:SIGN FAIL" messages on the MySensors gateway and the heater therefore fails to change of mode. Here are relevant logs:

Nov 10 07:35:21 DEBUG TSM:READY:NWD REQ
Nov 10 07:35:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=20,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
Nov 10 07:35:21 DEBUG TSF:SAN:OK
Nov 10 07:50:21 DEBUG TSF:SAN:OK
Nov 10 07:55:21 DEBUG TSM:READY:NWD REQ
Nov 10 07:55:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=20,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
Nov 10 08:00:01 DEBUG !TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=NACK:
Nov 10 08:00:01 DEBUG !TSF:MSG:SIGN FAIL
Nov 10 08:05:21 DEBUG TSF:SRT:OK
Nov 10 08:05:21 DEBUG TSF:SAN:OK
Nov 10 08:15:21 DEBUG TSM:READY:NWD REQ
Nov 10 08:15:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=20,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
Nov 10 08:20:21 DEBUG TSF:SAN:OK
Nov 10 08:35:21 DEBUG TSF:SRT:OK
Nov 10 08:35:21 DEBUG TSM:READY:NWD REQ
Nov 10 08:35:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=20,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
Nov 10 08:35:21 DEBUG TSF:SAN:OK
Nov 10 08:50:21 DEBUG TSF:SAN:OK
Nov 10 08:55:21 DEBUG TSM:READY:NWD REQ
Nov 10 08:55:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=20,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
Nov 10 09:05:21 DEBUG TSF:SRT:OK
Nov 10 09:05:21 DEBUG TSF:SAN:OK
Nov 10 09:15:21 DEBUG TSM:READY:NWD REQ
Nov 10 09:15:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=20,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
Nov 10 09:20:21 DEBUG TSF:SAN:OK
Nov 10 09:35:21 DEBUG TSF:SRT:OK
Nov 10 09:35:21 DEBUG TSM:READY:NWD REQ
Nov 10 09:35:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=20,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
Nov 10 09:35:21 DEBUG TSF:SAN:OK
Nov 10 09:50:21 DEBUG TSF:SAN:OK
Nov 10 09:55:21 DEBUG TSM:READY:NWD REQ
Nov 10 09:55:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=20,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
Nov 10 10:05:21 DEBUG TSF:SRT:OK
Nov 10 10:05:21 DEBUG TSF:SAN:OK
Nov 10 10:10:30 DEBUG !TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=NACK:
Nov 10 10:10:30 DEBUG !TSF:MSG:SIGN FAIL
Nov 10 10:10:30 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:<NONCE>
Nov 10 10:10:34 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
Nov 10 10:10:34 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:<NONCE>
Nov 10 10:10:34 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=0,c=1,t=3,pt=0,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:0

As you can see, when I noticed that the heater was cold at 10:10 a.m. this morning, I changed the mode back to something else ("Off", which failed) and changed again to comfort (and this time, it worked).

Do you have any clue why this is happening? Note that I haven't touched to the hardware.
Is there a way to tell MySensors to re-send a message if it fails? Or maybe I could do something on the HomeAssistant side?

Also, note that the radios used are RFM69W modules. Regarding location, the node is at the basement, the gateway is upstairs and if you drew a line through the walls, the distance between both is approximately 15 meters, I'd say.

Thanks in advance for your help!

#-------------------- Appendix --------------------#

My Raspberry Pi serial Gateway:

My pilot wire prototype:

Thanks for the feedback @zboblamont!
I was probably overthinking the whole thing

Hello!

I'll post a quick message on the forums this time

I will surely run out of RFM69W radios in the coming weeks, since I will finish one of my projects and I have a few other ideas of sensors to build.
I am planning to order something like 10 RFM69W radios directly to HopeRF (its manufacturer) to be sure I get genuine parts.

So, I thought: why not do a collective purchase order, so that we can all reduce shipping costs?

Regarding the price of the radios, HopeRF sold them $2.60 each almost 2 years ago. The shipping cost was $8 (EMS packet) or $30 (DHL) and there was a $2 paypal charge.

A friend of mine would also be interested in ordering 10 radios, so we are two for the moment. Is there anyone in the Paris area also interested?
Once received, I could give you the radios in person in Paris since I work there.

Cheers!

Hello!

Thank you @TRS-80 and @zboblamont for your answers and sorry for the delay...

To answer your question @TRS-80, I'm actually trying to figure out what is the most robust way to use the MySensors library.
Most examples out there consider that all underlying layers (hardware, transmission...) will just work an the return value of sleep / send is never used.

I've found that if the send call fails due to missing hardware ACKs, the node ends up registering again. So, I was considering retrying sending data if send failed, but MySensors already retries sending the data a few times as @zboblamont says.

Regarding the sleep call, I'm now checking the return value and making sure that the return code is the interrupt, as specified by the API. Here is my new code:

// MySensors configuration
#define MY_SPLASH_SCREEN_DISABLED
#define MY_RADIO_RFM69
#define MY_RFM69_RST_PIN 8
#define MY_RFM69_NEW_DRIVER
#define MY_RFM69_ENABLE_ENCRYPTION 

// Include libraries
#include <MySensors.h>

// Global settings
#define BATT_ADC_PIN A1
#define CHILD_ID 0
#define SENSOR_PIN 3
#define SENSOR_INT digitalPinToInterrupt(SENSOR_PIN)

// Global variables
byte last_batt_level = 0;
unsigned long total_water = 0;
MyMessage water_msg(CHILD_ID, V_VOLUME);

// Check the battery voltage and eventually send it
void report_battery_level() {

    // Read the battery voltage
    long adc = analogRead(BATT_ADC_PIN);

    // Compute the battery level
    // Vmin = 1.6/(3.3/1023) = 496
    // Vmax = 3/(3.3/1023) = 930
    long level = (adc-496)*100/434;
    byte batt_level = constrain(level, 0, 100);
    
    // The battery level changed, send it
    if (batt_level != last_batt_level) {
        sendBatteryLevel(batt_level);        
        last_batt_level = batt_level;
    }
}

void presentation() { 
    sendSketchInfo("Water meter", "1.0");
    present(CHILD_ID, S_WATER);
}

void setup() {
    pinMode(BATT_ADC_PIN, INPUT);
    pinMode(SENSOR_PIN, INPUT);
}

void loop() {
  
    // Sleep until we get a FALLING signal
    byte interrupt = sleep(SENSOR_INT, FALLING, 0);

    // We were woken up by the sensor
    if (interrupt == SENSOR_INT) {

        // Send the new water volume to the gateway
        total_water++;
        send(water_msg.set(total_water));
    
        // Send the battery level every 150L
        if (total_water % 150 == 0) {
            report_battery_level();
        }
    }
}

I've had communication issues since I changed the code and the reported water consumption didn't skyrocket as previously, which is good.

To answer to @zboblamont, the FALLING interrupt is fine actually. The water volume is incremented "rather slowly", at most every 7s I'd say (if we open all taps :P).

I'll have to fix the communication problems and to do that I'll have to design proper PCBs. The sensors / gateway are on breadboards right now, which is surely suboptimal.

Cheers!

Hello everyone!

I recently built a water meter with MySensors based on:

• A barebone ATMEGA328P
• An RFM69W radio
• The ITRON Cyble sensor (https://www.itron.com/-/media/feature/products/documents/brochure/cyble-sensor-water-brochure-english.pdf).
• Two AA batteries, a 3.3V boost converter...

Here is the code running on the microcontroller:

// MySensors configuration
#define MY_SPLASH_SCREEN_DISABLED
#define MY_RADIO_RFM69
#define MY_RFM69_RST_PIN 8
#define MY_RFM69_NEW_DRIVER
#define MY_RFM69_ENABLE_ENCRYPTION 

// Include libraries
#include <MySensors.h>

// Global settings
#define BATT_ADC_PIN A1
#define CHILD_ID 0
#define SENSOR_PIN 3

// Global variables
byte last_batt_level = 0;
unsigned long total_water = 0;
MyMessage water_msg(CHILD_ID, V_VOLUME);

// Check the battery voltage and eventually send it
void report_battery_level() {

    // Read the battery voltage
    long adc = analogRead(BATT_ADC_PIN);

    // Compute the battery level
    // Vmin = 2/(3.3/1023) = 620
    // Vmax = 3/(3.3/1023) = 930
    long level = (adc-620)*100/310;
    byte batt_level = constrain(level, 0, 100);
    
    // The battery level changed, send it
    if (batt_level != last_batt_level) {
        sendBatteryLevel(batt_level);        
        last_batt_level = batt_level;
    }
}

void presentation() { 
    sendSketchInfo("Water meter", "1.0");
    present(CHILD_ID, S_WATER);
}

void setup() {
    pinMode(BATT_ADC_PIN, INPUT);
    pinMode(SENSOR_PIN, INPUT);
}

void loop() {
  
    // Sleep until we get a FALLING signal
    sleep(digitalPinToInterrupt(SENSOR_PIN), FALLING, 0);

    // Send the new water volume to the gateway
    total_water++;
    send(water_msg.set(total_water));

    // Send the battery level every 150L
    if (total_water % 150 == 0) {
        report_battery_level();
    }
}

It has been working well globally. However I ran into two issues.

First problem: For an unknown reason, my Raspberry Pi gateway stopped responding at some point. As a result, the send() call probably failed and I suspect the sleep() method to immediately return with a value I don't check. When I restarted the gateway, the node reported a water consumption of a million liters so the loop() method was surely called multiple times...
This is the first issue to fix in the code.

Second problem: When the voltage of the batteries was too low, the same kind of problem also occured. I could see in the gateway logs that the sensor tried to reconnect multiple times without success (there were NACKs during the presentation step), since the radio didn't have enough power to operate normally. When presentation finally succeeded, the node reposted a water consumption of a million litters. So here again, the loop() method had been called multiple times.

So, what is the "robust" way to prevent these problems, in the code?

The underlying questions probably are:

• What will happen if the send() call fails? Will the code continue or will it retry sending the data a few times?
• In which cases will the sleep() method actually not put the node into sleep mode?
• Do you know why the loop() method was called multiple times, resulting in a large value of the total_water variable during the issue? According to this discussion, I would have thought the loop() method would not have been called again if the node wasn't successfully reconnected to the gateway due to the while (!isTransportReady() && (sleepDeltaMS < sleepingTimeMS) && (sleepDeltaMS < MY_SLEEP_TRANSPORT_RECONNECT_TIMEOUT_MS)) part of the code... Unless _process() actually calls loop()?

It would be great to have complete "robust" sketch examples in the MySensors repository on GitHub, since all examples consider that the gateway will always be responding, that the node will always be correctly power and will always successfully send its payload.

On the hardware side, the Connecting the radio page also assumes that the RFM69W radio will always be operating correctly and it's not recommended to connect the RESET pin of the radio to the Arduino / ATMEGA. That's unfortunate since connecting that pin on one of my projects recently fixed stability issues!

Thanks in advance for your help!

Hello everyone and thank you for your feedback so far!

@BearWithBeard gave a good argument since I'm also using HomeAssistant.

Moreover, adding such a circuit will only add €0.50 per board, so it sounds good!

Helloes

I am back on the forums with a quite simple question for you

I am currently finishing to design a PCB for a MySensors project with "elementary" components: an ATMEGA328P as microcontroller, an HLK-PM03 as power supply, an RFM69W as radio...
This node will be directly connected to mains, therefore the only way to reboot it is to remove the fuse at the fuse box, which isn't very handy.

This made me wonder: is it worth adding a reset circuit (connected to the RESET pin of the microcontroller) to a MySensors node?
In other words, have you ever experienced issues with your nodes that required a power cycle / reset?

I'm in touch with a MySensors user (brianx) over IRC (#mysensors on Freenode, which I invite you to join ). He told me that one of his nodes sometimes freezes and power cycling isn't very easy.

On my side, I built a MySensors "pilot wire" node a few months ago. Sometimes, after something like 15 days to a month, the node also freezes: it stops responding to any command, including network discovery requests.
I didn't add an electrolytic capacitor to the prototype -- which probably doesn't help -- but I guess a reset circuit could be worth in the final version of the board.

So what are your opinions / experiences?

Personally, I'd just use the AEM10941, ah ah.

It has MPPT module, starts charging the storage medium when your solar cell reached 50mV... It's hard to beat that

That being said, it's made to work with small solar cells, so if you plan to use "big" panels (via V > 5V or I > 110 mA), then building your own circuit will be better.

I can't say much about your design though, I haven't enough knowledge on that matter

Hello again!

I restarted the node this morning, just out of curiosity...

I'm actually very surprised to see that presentation works without any problem (and the node sends its initial value correctly), but commands sent later failed...

Here are the logs:

Nov 16 12:12:16 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
Nov 16 12:12:16 DEBUG TSF:MSG:BC
Nov 16 12:12:16 DEBUG TSF:MSG:FPAR REQ,ID=2
Nov 16 12:12:16 DEBUG TSF:PNG:SEND,TO=0
Nov 16 12:12:16 DEBUG TSF:CKU:OK
Nov 16 12:12:16 DEBUG TSF:MSG:GWL OK
Nov 16 12:12:16 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
Nov 16 12:12:18 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
Nov 16 12:12:18 DEBUG TSF:MSG:PINGED,ID=2,HP=1
Nov 16 12:12:18 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
Nov 16 12:12:18 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0101
Nov 16 12:12:18 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0100
Nov 16 12:12:18 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
Nov 16 12:12:18 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:<NONCE>
Nov 16 12:12:18 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=5,sg=1:2.3.1
Nov 16 12:12:19 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1:
Nov 16 12:12:19 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:<NONCE>
Nov 16 12:12:19 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:0
Nov 16 12:12:19 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
Nov 16 12:12:19 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:<NONCE>
Nov 16 12:12:19 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=0,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:M
Nov 16 12:12:19 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1:
Nov 16 12:12:19 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:<NONCE>
Nov 16 12:12:19 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=10,sg=1:Fil pilote
Nov 16 12:12:20 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1:
Nov 16 12:12:20 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:<NONCE>
Nov 16 12:12:20 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=12,pt=0,l=3,sg=1:1.0
Nov 16 12:12:20 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1:
Nov 16 12:12:20 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:<NONCE>
Nov 16 12:12:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=0,c=0,t=4,pt=0,l=0,sg=1:
Nov 16 12:12:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:2
Nov 16 12:12:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
Nov 16 12:12:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:<NONCE>
Nov 16 12:12:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:1
Nov 16 12:12:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1:
Nov 16 12:12:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:<NONCE>
Nov 16 12:12:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=0,c=1,t=2,pt=2,l=2,sg=1:1
Nov 16 12:12:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1:
Nov 16 12:12:22 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:<NONCE>
Nov 16 12:12:22 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=0,c=1,t=3,pt=2,l=2,sg=1:2
Nov 16 12:13:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
Nov 16 12:13:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:<NONCE>
Nov 16 12:13:21 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=0,c=1,t=3,pt=0,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:3
Nov 16 12:13:25 DEBUG !TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=NACK:
Nov 16 12:13:25 DEBUG !TSF:MSG:SIGN FAIL
Nov 16 12:13:25 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:<NONCE>
Nov 16 12:13:30 DEBUG !TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=NACK:
Nov 16 12:13:30 DEBUG !TSF:MSG:SIGN FAIL
Nov 16 12:13:30 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:<NONCE>
Nov 16 12:13:39 DEBUG !TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=NACK:
Nov 16 12:13:39 DEBUG !TSF:MSG:SIGN FAIL
Nov 16 12:13:39 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:<NONCE>
Nov 16 12:13:44 DEBUG !TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=NACK:
Nov 16 12:13:44 DEBUG !TSF:MSG:SIGN FAIL
Nov 16 12:13:44 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:<NONCE>
Nov 16 12:13:47 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
Nov 16 12:13:47 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:<NONCE>
Nov 16 12:13:47 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=0,c=1,t=3,pt=0,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:0

As you can see, the node finished starting at 12:13:25 but my first command at 12:13:25 failed.

If it was really a noise / power supply issue, I would expect presentation to fail, considering that it's a long process taking more than 5s and using the radio quite intensively.

I've read that people here got range issue with MySensors 2.3.x, isn't that linked? Here for instance:

• https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/9321/rpi-ethernet-gateway-with-rfm69h-c-w-very-poor-range/9
• https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/7912/rfm69-new-driver-delay/56

@tekka: It seems you were working on that, was it supposed to be fixed in version 2.3.1?

I can't enable radio logging easily but I suspect it could be caused by the auto-adjusting RSSI feature...

Well, I'm using RFM69W radios running on the 868MHz band.
So, there should be a very low traffic on that band (compared to Wi-Fi).

I'll probably add a capacitor near Vcc pin of the radio, I've just seen on the datasheet that it's recommended , although it seems there is already one on the board.

Also, regarding the gateway, I plan to make a dipole antenna, since I don't have any space constraint.

Hello @Anticimex, thanks for your answer!

You're right, since nothing changed on the hardware side, it may be a noise / power supply issue.

Also, I should really finish making clean MySensors PCBs for that project and not rely on breadboards and stuff like that which is very likely to degrade the signal.

I'll keep you updated with my progress, thanks again

Hello!

The issue persists finally, but network discovery seems to be working, it seems... Here are relevant logs:

Nov 14 21:32:00 DEBUG TSM:READY:NWD REQ
Nov 14 21:32:00 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=20,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
Nov 14 21:32:00 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=21,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:0
Nov 14 21:41:59 DEBUG TSF:SRT:OK
Nov 14 21:42:00 DEBUG TSF:SAN:OK
Nov 14 21:52:00 DEBUG TSM:READY:NWD REQ
Nov 14 21:52:00 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=20,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
Nov 14 21:52:00 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=21,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:0
Nov 14 21:57:00 DEBUG TSF:SAN:OK
Nov 14 22:00:00 DEBUG !TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=NACK:
Nov 14 22:00:00 DEBUG !TSF:MSG:SIGN FAIL
Nov 14 22:00:00 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:<NONCE>
Nov 14 22:00:41 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
Nov 14 22:00:42 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:<NONCE>
Nov 14 22:00:42 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=0,c=1,t=3,pt=0,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:6
Nov 14 22:00:43 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
Nov 14 22:00:43 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,2-2-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:<NONCE>
Nov 14 22:00:43 DEBUG TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-2-2,s=0,c=1,t=3,pt=0,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:3

As you can see, the heater was supposed to go into "Eco" mode at 22:00:00 but signing failed.
It seems that the nonce was received though, but the nonce request wasn't acknowledged...

At 22:00:43, I changed manually the mode to "Off" and to "Eco" again (in HomeAssistant) and it finally worked...

Do you have any clue why this is happening?
Maybe @Anticimex -- the awesome security guy of MySensors -- has an idea?