Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. So close =)

So close =)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
11 Posts 5 Posters 3.5k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • daulagariD Offline
    daulagariD Offline
    daulagari
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Indeed, very close ;-)

    The logs you are showing indicate the sensor is asking an NodeID to the gateway. The gateway does not answer this as this is the task of the controller, Vera in your case I assume.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • bobnataleB Offline
      bobnataleB Offline
      bobnatale
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      I think you are correct. I just noticed that there is no lib version in Vera which I understand to mean that it is not communicating with the Nano. I read in another thread that the Chinese knock offs don't work well as GW. I have tried a few different Nano's (all from Banggood.com) all with the same results. I guess I will have to try a non-knockoff unless anyone else has any ideas. I have deleted and recreated the device in Vera a few times.

      upload-b3d80504-ee5b-4109-b047-a22ec83927de that

      RJ_MakeR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • bobnataleB Offline
        bobnataleB Offline
        bobnatale
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Here is my serial config:

        upload-00b7d04b-d8ae-4e4e-a15f-a73fe5d25d96

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • bobnataleB bobnatale

          I think you are correct. I just noticed that there is no lib version in Vera which I understand to mean that it is not communicating with the Nano. I read in another thread that the Chinese knock offs don't work well as GW. I have tried a few different Nano's (all from Banggood.com) all with the same results. I guess I will have to try a non-knockoff unless anyone else has any ideas. I have deleted and recreated the device in Vera a few times.

          upload-b3d80504-ee5b-4109-b047-a22ec83927de that

          RJ_MakeR Offline
          RJ_MakeR Offline
          RJ_Make
          Hero Member
          wrote on last edited by RJ_Make
          #5

          @bobnatale
          Hmmm No lib. version is being presented. Looked at mine.... the 'Used by device' info is different.

          2014-10-18_18-12-28.png

          RJ_Make

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N Offline
            N Offline
            niccodemi
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            I had similar problems when using "nano compatible" boards, ie no lib version displayed, gateway stopped receiving data after few hours / days. Finally I bought original nano board and all these issues disappeared. It has something to do with counterfeit FTDI chips (check http://forum.arduino.cc/ for more info).

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • bobnataleB Offline
              bobnataleB Offline
              bobnatale
              wrote on last edited by bobnatale
              #7

              Thanks all. Any thoughts on going with a "real" nano or shifting gears and going with ethernet gw? Cost is bout the same. Any upside either way?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • greglG Offline
                greglG Offline
                gregl
                Hero Member
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                i started with Nano connected via serial to Vera lite - worked great when it was working, but vera kept dropping the serial port, so i moved to ethernet ( initalay via a Freetronics Etherten on 1.3) .. actually this is still running perfectly.

                Also have been running on iBoard and 1.4 for a while and its now nice and stable.

                Imho... Ethernet > serial.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • bobnataleB Offline
                  bobnataleB Offline
                  bobnatale
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Kind of what I figured. Plus, they have them at radio shack. =)

                  Thanks all. I will post my results later

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • bobnataleB Offline
                    bobnataleB Offline
                    bobnatale
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Making some progress but still no joy.

                    I added an ethernet shield to an UNO, and I have it on the network and responding to ping. Yeah me!

                    I am unable to get it to recognize the radio. I get "check wires" in the serial monitor. I have triple checked the wires and tried several different radio chips and have added a 4.7 capacitor.
                    ==>Question here: The IRQ post doesn't connect anywhere on the arduino, right? I noticed that is says to connect to pin 2 on the serial gw, but it is not mentioned in the ethernet gw.

                    I have also created the device in Vera. It shows "Lua Failure" on the device and I get a cannot send command in the message window at the top. Also, no Lib version is displayed.
                    ==>Is this normal behavior because it can't communicate with the Radio, or do I have another issue here?

                    Any help is GREATLY appreciated!

                    upload-34d3b576-cfea-4b78-8641-568f09ca0862
                    upload-3d7cf87f-5dc4-4f19-8f96-bb4ae3382c2b
                    upload-79c70512-9921-4dc6-8c73-95ae845de39f

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • greglG Offline
                      greglG Offline
                      gregl
                      Hero Member
                      wrote on last edited by gregl
                      #11

                      That "check wires" means its not going to work....so better check the wires again!

                      Note that the pins for connecting the radio on a Ethernet gateway are different than any other of your sensors!

                      http://www.mysensors.org/build/ethernet_gateway

                      Re the IRQ connection - i believe this is still un-used on gateway. ( might be worth trying connecting it to D2 just in case...)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      13

                      Online

                      11.7k

                      Users

                      11.2k

                      Topics

                      113.0k

                      Posts


                      Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • MySensors
                      • OpenHardware.io
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular