Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Announcements
  3. SHA1 is broken, should I need to worry about MySensors security?

SHA1 is broken, should I need to worry about MySensors security?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
3 Posts 2 Posters 2.1k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anticimex
    Contest Winner
    wrote on last edited by Anticimex
    #1

    Recently, Google announced that it had succeeded in calculation colliding SHA1 checksums with "reasonable" effort and thus concluding SHA1 is now obsolete and insecure.
    MySensors security backend rely on hashes as well, but rest assured there is absolutely no impact for message signatures as they are based on SHA256 and not SHA1.
    For details on the cracking, see here.

    Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      Nca78
      Hardware Contributor
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Great, no use to trash my stock of atsha :D

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Nca78

        Great, no use to trash my stock of atsha :D

        A Offline
        A Offline
        Anticimex
        Contest Winner
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @Nca78 indeed you don't need to do that. And according to Linus himself, we don't really need to worry about our git repositories being compromised either. And he is correct, as there is a difference in using hashes for content identifiers (like git) and security signing (like us).
        For an attacker to try to make a collision attack they need to

        1. Hack githubs security (or fool the core team)
        2. Design a collision that contains data that would go unnoticed in our repo.

        Both quite unlikely ;)

        Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0

        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

        Register Login
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        19

        Online

        12.0k

        Users

        11.2k

        Topics

        113.4k

        Posts


        Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • MySensors
        • OpenHardware.io
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular