Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. My Project
  3. Using a sensor to sense the presence of copper wire.

Using a sensor to sense the presence of copper wire.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved My Project
44 Posts 11 Posters 5.6k Views 9 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #35

    How about a pressure switch .

    If you are referring to a pressure switch for the wire to apply the pressure, the wire will be as small as a human hair. Not capable of applying pressure.

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ? A Former User

      How about a pressure switch .

      If you are referring to a pressure switch for the wire to apply the pressure, the wire will be as small as a human hair. Not capable of applying pressure.

      B Offline
      B Offline
      boozz
      wrote on last edited by
      #36

      @moparjay
      have you thought about using a jfet?

      see here for a google search

      ? 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • dbemowskD Offline
        dbemowskD Offline
        dbemowsk
        wrote on last edited by
        #37

        What about something like this:
        https://www.keyence.com/products/sensor/proximity/ta/models/th-305/index.jsp

        Vera Plus running UI7 with MySensors, Sonoffs and 1-Wire devices
        Visit my website for more Bits, Bytes and Ramblings from me: http://dan.bemowski.info/

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gohanG Offline
          gohanG Offline
          gohan
          Mod
          wrote on last edited by
          #38

          It looks interesting, but I haven't seen if it may work with copper too

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B boozz

            @moparjay
            have you thought about using a jfet?

            see here for a google search

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            A Former User
            wrote on last edited by
            #39

            have you thought about using a jfet?

            Thanks for the info. But I'm fine with the simplicity of a momentary, if full-automation-clamping is too difficult...or expensive. LOL

            SchlogS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ? A Former User

              have you thought about using a jfet?

              Thanks for the info. But I'm fine with the simplicity of a momentary, if full-automation-clamping is too difficult...or expensive. LOL

              SchlogS Offline
              SchlogS Offline
              Schlog
              wrote on last edited by
              #40

              @moparjay
              what about when sliding the wire into the top hole you give it a + charge and the base a - charge with a circuit that will do when the 2 touch.

              ? 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • SchlogS Schlog

                @moparjay
                what about when sliding the wire into the top hole you give it a + charge and the base a - charge with a circuit that will do when the 2 touch.

                ? Offline
                ? Offline
                A Former User
                wrote on last edited by
                #41

                what about when sliding the wire into the top hole you give it a + charge and the base a - charge with a circuit that will do when the 2 touch.

                If the range of wire size was tighter, this would probably work well. But with the wide range of sizes, trying to make contact with the smallest sizes would be a real pain.

                SchlogS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ? A Former User

                  what about when sliding the wire into the top hole you give it a + charge and the base a - charge with a circuit that will do when the 2 touch.

                  If the range of wire size was tighter, this would probably work well. But with the wide range of sizes, trying to make contact with the smallest sizes would be a real pain.

                  SchlogS Offline
                  SchlogS Offline
                  Schlog
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #42

                  @moparjay
                  how about an "S" shape input tube any size would have to touch the tube on the inside the "S" shape tube can be any size you like.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • E Offline
                    E Offline
                    executivul
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #43
                    1. Optical detection: a light source on one side of the hole and a phototransistor on the other, read as analog values since the small wires won't completely cover the light source

                    2. Inductive sensor, a coil around the hole, and some form of detecting the change of inductance, start by making a small coil and test with a LCR meter

                    3. Capacitive sensor, open air dielectric, plates across the hole, the wire and operator (even holding the insulated wire) will change the capacitor response a lot, test with some capacitive/touch sensing circuitry.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      A Former User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #44

                      Thanks to all that have given input. I'm going to give in and simply use the momentary to open the cylinder (normally closed). It's just too easy. And going automated is not worth the added expense, as this single cylinder prototype will be duplicated to almost (100) cylinders....each completely independent from one another. Thank you!!!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      21

                      Online

                      11.7k

                      Users

                      11.2k

                      Topics

                      113.1k

                      Posts


                      Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • MySensors
                      • OpenHardware.io
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular